Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:12:57.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Boundary-layer pressures and the Corcos model: a development to incorporate low-wavenumber constraints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

J. E. Ffowcs Williams
J. E. Ffowcs Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper re-examines the theoretical arguments that indicate the structure of the pressure field induced on a flat surface by boundary-layer turbulence at low Mach number. The long-wave elements are shown to be dictated by the acoustics of the flow, and the limit of the acoustic range is the coincidence condition of grazing waves where the spectrum is singular and proportional to the logarithm of the flow scale. The surface spectrum is shown to be proportional to the square of frequency at low-enough frequency and to the square of wavenumber at those low wavenumbers with subsonic phase speed.

The similarity model successfully used by Corcos for the main convective elements of the field is used in this paper to model the turbulent sources of pressure, not the pressure itself, so that a Corcos-like description of the pressure spectrum is derived that is consistent with constraints imposed by the governing equations. This results in a fairly compact specification of the pressure spectrum with yet-undetermined constants, which must be derived from experiment. Despite an extensive search of published data on the pressure field, it is concluded that existing information is an inadequate basis for setting those constants and that new free field experiments are needed. Boundary layers formed on gliders or buoyant underwater bodies offer the most promising source of such data.

The paper concludes with a study of how large flush-mounted transducers discriminate against the local flow noise field and i t is shown that they do so at a rate of 9 decibels per doubling of transducer diameter. This different conclusion from Corcos’ correct 6 decibel rate for small transducers is entirely due to the low- wavenumber constraints on the spectrum, which are misrepresented in the simple similarity model. This result, which conforms with the constraints imposed by the weak compressibility of the fluid, is the same as that later suggested by Corcos for transducers that are large on the boundary-layer scale.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 125 , December 1982 , pp. 9 - 25
Copyright
© 1982 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergeron, R. F. 1973 Aerodynamic sound and the low-wavenumber wall-pressure spectrum of nearly incompressible boundary-layer turbulence. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 123–133.Google Scholar
Blake, W. K. & Chase, D. M. 1963 Wavenumber–frequency spectra of turbulent boundary layer pressure measured by microphone arrays. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 192–199.Google Scholar
Butler, D. & Eatwell, G. 1980 Modifications to the Corcos model for the fluctuating pressure beneath a turbulent boundary layer. (unpublished paper.)
Chase, D. M. 1980 Modelling the wavevector–frequency spectrum of turbulent boundary layer wall pressure. J. Sound Vib. 70, 29–67.Google Scholar
Corcos, G. M. 1963 Resolution of pressure in turbulence. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 192–199.Google Scholar
Corcos, G. M. 1967 The resolution of turbulent pressures at the wall of a boundary layer. J. Sound. Vib. 6, 59–70.Google Scholar
Farabee, T. M. & Geib, E. F. 1976 Measurement of boundary layer pressure fields with an array of pressure transducers in a subsonic flow. DTNSRDC Rep. no. 76–0031.Google Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1965 Surface-pressure fluctuations induced by boundary layer flow at finite Mach number. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 507–519.Google Scholar
Hodgson, T. H. 1962 Pressure fluctuations in shear flow turbulence. Cranfield College of Aeronautics Note no. 129.Google Scholar
Hodgson, T. H. 1971 On the dipole radiation from a rigid and plane surface. In Proc. Purdue Noise Control Conf. 14–16 July, 1971. Purdue University.
Kraichnan, R. H. 1956 Pressure fluctuations, in the turbulent flow over a flat plate. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28, 378.Google Scholar
Lilley, G. M. & Hodgson, T. H. 1960 On surface pressure fluctuations in turbulent boundary layers. AGARD Rep. no. 276.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On sound generated aerodynamically. 1. General Theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 211, 566.Google Scholar
Maidanik, G. & Jorgensen, D. W. 1967 Boundary wave-vector filters for the study of the pressure field in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42, 494–501.Google Scholar
Panton, R. L., Goldman, A. L., Lowery, R. L. & Reischman, M. M. 1980 Low-frequency pressure fluctuations in axisymmetric turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 97, 299–319.Google Scholar
Panton, R. L. & Linebarger, J. H. 1974 Wall pressure spectrum calculations for equilibrium boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 65, 261–287.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1956 On the aerodynamic surface sound from a plane turbulent boundary layer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 234, 327.Google Scholar
Uberoi, M. S. & Kovasznay, L. S. G. 1953 On mapping and measurement of random fields. Q. Appl. Math. 10, 375–393.Google Scholar
Willmarth, W. W. & Wooldridge, C. E. 1962 Measurements of the fluctuating pressure at the wall beneath a thick turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 187–210.Google Scholar
Wills, J. A. B. 1970 Measurement of the wave-number/phase velocity spectrum of wall pressure beneath a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 45, 65–90.Google Scholar