Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:04:02.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bend theory of river meanders with spatial width variations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2011

ROSSELLA LUCHI ,
GUIDO ZOLEZZI  and
MARCO TUBINO
ROSSELLA LUCHI
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Trento, via Mesiano 77, 38122Italy
GUIDO ZOLEZZI*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Trento, via Mesiano 77, 38122Italy
MARCO TUBINO
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Trento, via Mesiano 77, 38122Italy
*
‡Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present work revisits the classical, uniform-width bend theory with the aim to understand whether and how spatial width oscillations can affect the process of linear bend stability that initiates meander planform evolution. Although longitudinal oscillations of channel width are common along many meandering streams, little investigation of their properties and dynamic effects has been pursued so far. The theory therefore accounts for width variations as a geometrical forcing in a depth-averaged model of meander morphodynamics by assuming the potential interaction with the classical curvature forcing effect. A first quantification of width variations is made by referring to a freely evolving meandering river, which shows that the dimensionless amplitude of width variations is a ‘small’ parameter with comparable magnitude to that of curvature variations, thus suggesting the use of a two-parameter perturbation expansion. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that channel width oscillates in space with a double frequency relative to curvature, which implies that one nonlinear interaction between the two forcing effects is enough to reproduce the effect of spatial width variations on the process of bend stability. Overall, width variations consistently promote the instability of shorter bends with respect to meanders with uniform width: on average, this predicted tendency is supported by analysis of field data referring to hundreds of natural meander bends. The effect on meander wavelength selection depends on the location of the widest section relative to the bend apex. Under typical formative conditions of gravel-bed rivers, with large-enough channel aspect ratios, two distinct most unstable longitudinal modes develop. Such behaviour is absent when the width is uniform, and suggests a mechanistic interpretation for the reach-scale occurrence of chute cutoffs that can be observed more frequently in wider-at-bends than in equiwidth meandering channels.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: River dynamics Geophysical and Geological Flows: Sediment transport
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 681 , 25 August 2011 , pp. 311 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Present address: Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Genova, via Montallegro 1, 16145 Italy

References

REFERENCES

Bertoldi, W. & Tubino, M. 2005 Bed and bank evolution of bifurcating channels. Water Resour. Res. 41 (7), W07001, doi:10.1029/2004WR003333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanckaert, K. & de Vriend, H. J. 2004 Secondary flow in sharp open channel bends. J. Fluid Mech. 498, 353–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondeaux, P. & Seminara, G. 1985 A unified bar-bend theory of river meanders. J. Fluid Mech. 157, 449–470, doi:10.1017/S0022112085002440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolla Pittaluga, M., Nobile, G. & Seminara, G. 2009 A nonlinear model for river meandering. Water Resour. Res. 45, w04432, doi:10.1029/2008WR007298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brice, J. C. 1975 Air Photo Interpretation of the Form and Behavior of Alluvial Rivers. Final Rep. US. Army Research Office, Washington University, 10p.Google Scholar
Brice, J. C. 1982 Stream channel stability assessment. Rep. No. FHWA/RD. Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation, 42p.Google Scholar
Camporeale, C., Perona, P., Porporato, A. & Ridolfi, L. 2007 Hierarchy of models for meandering rivers and related morphodynamic processes. Rev. Geophys. 45 (1), RG1001, doi:10.1029/2005RG000185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carling, P. 1988 The concept of dominant discharge applied to 2 gravel-bed streams in relation to channel stability thresholds. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 13 (4), 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombini, M., Seminara, G. & Tubino, M. 1987 Finite-amplitude alternate bars. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantine, J. A., McLean, S. R. & Dunne, T. 2010 A mechanism of chute cutoff along large meandering rivers with uniform floodplain topography. GSA Bull. 122 (5/6), 855–869, doi:10.1130/B26560.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darby, S. E., Alabyan, A. M. & Van de Wiel, M. J. 2002 Numerical simulation of bank erosion and channel migration in meandering rivers. Water Resour. Res. 38 (9), 1163, doi:10.1029/2001WR000602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, B. F. & Smith, D. H. 2002 Critical wavelength for river meandering. Phys. Rev. E 63, 045304(R), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.63.045304.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R. I., Ashmore, P. E., Ashworth, P. J., Paola, C. & Prestegaard, K. L. 1992 Measurements in a braided river chute and lobe. 1. Flow pattern, sediment transport and channel change. Water Resour. Res. 28 (7), 1877–1886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frascati, A. & Lanzoni, S. 2009 Morphodynamic regime and long-term evolution of meandering rivers. J. Geophys. Res. 114, F02002, doi:10.1029/2008JF001101.Google Scholar
Frascati, A. & Lanzoni, S. 2010 Long-term meandering evolution as part of chaotic dynamics? a contribution from mathematical modelling. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. (Special Issue on River Meander Dynamics, ed. Hooke, J. M., Gautier, E. and Zolezzi, G.) 35 (7), 791–802, doi:10.1002/esp.1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier, E., Brunstein, D., Vauchel, P., Roulet, M., Fuertes, O., Darrozes, J. & Bourrel, L. 2007 Temporal relations between meander deformation, water discharge and sediment fluxes, floodplain of the Rio Beni (Bolivian Amazonia). Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 32 (2), 230–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, K. 1977 Computer simulation of the gradual migration of meandering channels (in Japanese). In Proceedings of the Hokkaido Branch, Japan Society of Civil Engineering, pp. 197–202.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, K. 1989 Studies on qualitative and quantitative prediction of meander channel shift. In River Meandering AGU, Water Resour. Monogr. (ed. Ikeda, S. & Parker, G.), vol. 12, pp. 215–235. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hey, R. D. 1982 Design Equations for Mobile Gravel-Bed Rivers, (ed. Hey, R. D., Bathurst, J. C. & Thorne, C. R.), pp. 553–574. Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
Hooke, J. M. 1986 The significance of mid-channel bars in an active meandering river. Sedimentology 33 (6), 839–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, A. D. 1992 Modelling channel migration and floodplain sedimentation in meandering streams. In Lowland FloodPlain Rivers: Geomorphological Perspectives (ed. Carling, P. A. & Petts, G. E.), pp. 1–41. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ikeda, S., Parker, G. & Sawai, K. 1981 Bend theory of river meanders. Part 1. Linear development. J. Fluid Mech. 112, 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannesson, H. & Parker, G. 1989 Secondary flow in mildly sinuous channels. ASCE J. Hydraul. Engng 115, 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalkwijk, J. P. Th. & De Vriend, H. J. 1980 Computation of the flow in shallow river bends. J. Hydraul. Res. 18 (4), 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinoshita, R. 1961 Investigation of channel deformation in Ishikari River (in Japanese). Tech. Rep. Bureau of Resources, Dept. Science and Technology, Japan.Google Scholar
Knighton, A. D. 1972 Changes in a braided reach. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 83 (12), 3813–3822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagasse, P. F., Spitz, W. J., Zevenbergen, L. W. & Zachmann, D. W. 2004 Handbook for predicting stream meander migration. In NHCRP Rep. 533. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, 107 pp.Google Scholar
Langbein, W. B. & Leopold, L. B. 1964 Quasi equilibrium states in channel morphology. Am. J. Sci. 262, 782–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanzoni, S. & Seminara, G. 2006 On the nature of meander instability. J. Geophys. Res. 111, (F04006), doi:10.1029/2005JF000416.Google Scholar
Luchi, R. 2009 The effect of width and curvature variations on river meander morphodynamics. PhD thesis, Doctoral School in Environmental Engineering, University of Trento.Google Scholar
Luchi, R., Bertoldi, W., Zolezzi, G. & Tubino, M. 2007 Monitoring and predicting channel change in a free-evolving, small Alpine river: Ridanna Creek (North East Italy). Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 32 (14), 2104–2119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchi, R., Hooke, J., Zolezzi, G. & Bertoldi, W. 2010 a Width variations and mid-channel bar inception in meanders: River Bollin (UK). Geomorphology 119, 1–8, doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchi, R., Zolezzi, G. & Tubino, M. 2010 b Modelling mid-channel bars in meandering channels. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. (Special Issue on River Meander Dynamics, ed. Hooke, J. M., Gautier, E. & Zolezzi, G.) 35, 902–917, doi:10.1002/esp.1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. 1984 Theory of meander bend deformation. In River Meandering, Proceedings of the Conference Rivers 1983 (ed. Elliott, C. M.), pp. 722–732. American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Parker, G. 1990 Surface-based bedload transport relation for gravel rivers. J. Hydraul. Res. 28, 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G., Diplas, P. & Akiyama, J. 1983 Meanders bends of high amplitude. ASCE J. Hydraul. Engng 109, 1323–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G., Sawai, K. & Ikeda, S. 1982 Bend theory of river meanders, Part 2: Nonlinear deformation of finite-amplitude bends. J. Fluid Mech. 115, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G., Shimizu, Y., Wilkerson, G. V., Eke, E. C., Abad, J. D., Lauer, J. W., Paola, C., Dietrich, W. E. & Voller, V. R. 2011 A new framework for modeling the migration of meandering rivers. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 36 (1), 70–86. doi:10.1002/esp.2113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzuto, J. E. & Meckelnburg, T. S. 1989 Evaluation of a linear bank erosion equation. Water Resour. Res. 25 (5), 1005–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repetto, R., Tubino, M. & Paola, C. 2002 Planimetric instability of channels with variable width. J. Fluid Mech. 457, 79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinaldi, M. & Darby, S. E. 2007 Modelling river-bank-erosion processes and mass failure mechanisms: progress towards fully coupled simulations. In Gravel-bed Rivers 6-From Process Understanding to River Restoration. Series Developments in Earth Surface Processes, (ed. Habersack, H., Piegay, H. & Rinaldi, M.), vol. 11, pp. 213–239. Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozovskij, I. L. 1957 Flow of water in bends of open channel. Tech. Rep. Acad. Sci. Ukrainian SSR.Google Scholar
Rüther, N. & Olsen, N. R. B. 2007 Modelling free-forming meander evolution in a laboratory channel using three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics. Geomorphology, doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.12.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seminara, G. 2006 Meanders. Paper invited for the 50th Anniversary issue of the J. Fluid Mech. 554, 271–297.Google Scholar
Seminara, G. & Solari, L. 1998 Finite amplitude bed deformations in totally and partially transporting wide channel bends. Water Resour. Res. 34 (6), 1585–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seminara, G. & Tubino, M. 1989 Alternate bars and meandering: Free, forced and mixed interactions. In River Meandering (ed. Ikeda, S. & Parker, G.), pp. 267–320. AGU Water Resour. Monogr 12. American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seminara, G. & Tubino, M. 1992 Weakly nonlinear theory of regular meanders. J. Fluid Mech. 244, 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seminara, G., Zolezzi, G., Tubino, M. & Zardi, D. 2001 Downstream and upstream influence in river meandering. Part 2. Planimetric development. J. Fluid Mech. 438, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solari, L. & Seminara, G. 2005 On width variations in meandering rivers. In Proc. 4th IAHR Symp. River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics (RCEM 2005), 4–7 October, Urbana, IL (ed. Parker, G. & Garcia, M. H.), vol. 2, pp. 745–751. Balkema.Google Scholar
Stolum, H. H. 1996 River meandering as a self-organisation process. Science 271 (5256), 1710–1713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, T., Meaking, P., Jossang, T. & Schwarz, K. 1996 A simulation model for meandering rivers. Water Resour. Res. 32 (9), 2937–2954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmon, A. M., Struiksma, N. & Van Mierlo, M. C. L. M. 1995 Laboratory measurements of the direction of sediment transport on transverse alluvial-bed slopes. J. Hydraul. Res. 33, 519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tubino, M. & Seminara, G. 1990 Free-forced interactions in developing meanders and suppression of free bars. J. Fluid Mech. 214, 131–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. L. & Shimizu, Y. 2005 Numerical simulation of relatively wide, shallow channels with erodible banks. J. Hydraul. Engng 131 (7), 565–575.Google Scholar
Zolezzi, G., Luchi, R. & Tubino, M. 2009 a Coupling the dynamics of channel width and curvature in meandering rivers: a perspective on fluvial patterns. In Proceedings of RCEM 2009 Conference, Santa Fe, Argentina, 21–25 September. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Zolezzi, G., Luchi, R. & Tubino, M. 2009 b Morphodynamic regime of gravel bed, single-thread meandering rivers. J. Geophys. Res.—Earth Surf. 114, f01005, doi:10.1029/2007JF000968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zolezzi, G. & Seminara, G. 2001 Downstream and upstream influence in river meandering. Part 1. General theory and application of overdeepening. J. Fluid Mech. 438, 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Luchi supplementary material

Appendix

Download Luchi supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 73.3 KB