Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:35:58.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of unsteady flow effects on the Betz limit for flapping foil power generation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2020

John Young Open the ORCID record for John Young [Opens in a new window] ,
Fang-Bao Tian Open the ORCID record for Fang-Bao Tian [Opens in a new window] ,
Zhengliang Liu ,
Joseph C. S. Lai Open the ORCID record for Joseph C. S. Lai [Opens in a new window] ,
Nima Nadim  and
Anthony D. Lucey
John Young*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
Fang-Bao Tian
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
Zhengliang Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Ocean Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen518055, PR China
Joseph C. S. Lai
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
Nima Nadim
Affiliation:
School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA6102, Australia
Anthony D. Lucey
Affiliation:
School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA6102, Australia
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A control volume based analytical method for calculating the efficiency $\eta$ of flapping foil power generators was developed for single and tandem foil configurations. Ignoring unsteady effects and non-uniform pressures resulted in theoretical limits identical to the Betz ($\eta =16/27$ for a single turbine) and Newman ($\eta =16/25$ for tandem turbines) limits. Inclusion of unsteady flow and non-uniform pressure distributions produced theoretical efficiency maxima in excess of these limits. Simulation of single and tandem foil cases to determine the magnitude of these effects showed that the Betz limit would not be exceeded by a single foil system in practice, but that it is conceivable that a tandem foil system could exceed the Newman limit due to the strong unsteady vortex wake of the upstream turbine entraining additional energy into the path of the downstream turbine and maintaining pressures in the wake below ambient.

JFM classification

Mathematical Foundations: General fluid mechanics Wakes/Jets: Vortex streets Vortex Flows: Vortex shedding
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 902 , 10 November 2020 , A30
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Betz, A. 1920 Das Maximum der theoretisch möglichen Ausnützung des Windes durch Windmotoren. Z. Gesamte Turbinenwesen 26, 307–309.Google Scholar
Buchholz, J. H. J. & Smits, A. J. 2008 The wake structure and thrust performance of a rigid low-aspect-ratio pitching panel. J. Fluid Mech. 603, 331–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamorro, L. P. & Arndt, R. E. A. 2013 Non-uniform velocity distribution effect on the Betz-Joukowsky limit. Wind Energy 16, 279–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabiri, J. O. 2007 Renewable fluid dynamic energy derived from aquatic animal locomotion. Bioinspir. Biomim. 2 (3), L1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dabiri, J. O. 2020 Theoretical framework to surpass the Betz limit using unsteady fluid mechanics. Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 022501(R).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, S., Nishinio, T., Adcock, T. A. A. & Taylor, P. H. 2016 Performance of an ideal turbine in an inviscid shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 796, 86–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D., Strom, B., Mandre, S. & Breuer, K. 2017 Energy harvesting performance and flow structure of an oscillating hydrofoil with finite span. J. Fluids Struct. 70, 314–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, T. & Dumas, G. 2008 Parametric study of an oscillating airfoil in a power-extraction regime. AIAA J. 46 (6), 1318–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, T. & Dumas, G. 2012 a Computational fluid dynamics analysis of a hydrokinetic turbine based on oscillating hydrofoils. J. Fluids Engng 134 (2), 021104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, T. & Dumas, G. 2012 b Optimal tandem configuration for oscillating-foils hydrokinetic turbine. J. Fluids. Engng 134 (3), 031103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, T. & Dumas, G. 2012 c Three-dimensional effects on an oscillating-foil hydrokinetic turbine. J. Fluids. Engng 134 (7), 071105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kuik, G. A. M. 2007 The Lanchester-Betz-Joukowsky limit. Wind 10, 289–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, G. C. K. 2006 Wind energy conversion efficiency limit. Wind Engng 30 (5), 431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z., Lai, J. C. S., Young, J. & Tian, F.-B. 2017 Discrete vortex method with flow separation corrections for flapping-foil power generators. AIAA J. 55 (2), 410–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manwell, J. F., McGowan, J. G. & Rogers, A. L. 2009 Wind Energy Explained, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menter, F. R. 1994 Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 32 (8), 1598–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, B. G. 1986 Multiple actuator-disc theory for wind turbines. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 24 (3), 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, D. J. 2004 A general momentum theory applied to an energy-extracting actuator disc. Wind Energy 7 (3), 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, J. N. 2011 Aerodynamic aspects of wind energy conversion. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, J. N. & van Kuik, G. A. M. 2011 General momentum theory for wind turbines at low tip speed ratios. Wind Energy 14 (7), 821–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, F.-B., Luo, H., Zhu, L., Liao, J. C. & Lu, X.-Y. 2011 An efficient immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for the hydrodynamic interaction of elastic filaments. J. Comput. Phys. 230 (19), 7266–7283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vennell, R. 2013 Exceeding the Betz limit with tidal turbines. Renew. Energy 55, 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Q. & Zhu, Q. 2014 A review on flow energy harvesters based on flapping foils. J. Fluids Struct. 46, 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J., Lai, J. C. S. & Platzer, M. F. 2014 A review of progress and challenges in flapping foil power generation. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 67, 2–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J., Tian, F.-B. & Lai, J. C. S. 2017 Betz analysis of a single flapping foil power generator. In Flutter: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Flutter and Its Applications, ISFA2016, Tokyo, Japan, May 15–17, 2016. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency.Google Scholar