Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:01:16.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An explicit algebraic model for the subgrid-scale passive scalar flux

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Amin Rasam ,
Geert Brethouwer  and
Arne V. Johansson
Amin Rasam*
Affiliation:
Linné FLOW Centre, KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Geert Brethouwer
Affiliation:
Linné FLOW Centre, KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Arne V. Johansson
Affiliation:
Linné FLOW Centre, KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Marstorp et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 639, 2009, pp. 403–432), an explicit algebraic subgrid stress model (EASSM) for large-eddy simulation (LES) was proposed, which was shown to considerably improve LES predictions of rotating and non-rotating turbulent channel flow. In this paper, we extend that work and present a new explicit algebraic subgrid scalar flux model (EASSFM) for LES, based on the modelled transport equation of the subgrid-scale (SGS) scalar flux. The new model is derived using the same kind of methodology that leads to the explicit algebraic scalar flux model of Wikström et al. (Phys. Fluids, vol. 12, 2000, pp. 688–702). The algebraic form is based on a weak equilibrium assumption and leads to a model that depends on the resolved strain-rate and rotation-rate tensors, the resolved scalar-gradient vector and, importantly, the SGS stress tensor. An accurate prediction of the SGS scalar flux is consequently strongly dependent on an accurate description of the SGS stresses. The new EASSFM is therefore primarily used in connection with the EASSM, since this model can accurately predict SGS stresses. The resulting SGS scalar flux is not necessarily aligned with the resolved scalar gradient, and the inherent dependence on the resolved rotation-rate tensor makes the model suitable for LES of rotating flow applications. The new EASSFM (together with the EASSM) is validated for the case of passive scalar transport in a fully developed turbulent channel flow with and without system rotation. LES results with the new model show good agreement with direct numerical simulation data for both cases. The new model predictions are also compared to those of the dynamic eddy diffusivity model (DEDM) and improvements are observed in the prediction of the resolved and SGS scalar quantities. In the non-rotating case, the model performance is studied at all relevant resolutions, showing that its predictions of the Nusselt number are much less dependent on the grid resolution and are more accurate. In channel flow with wall-normal rotation, where all the SGS stresses and fluxes are non-zero, the new model shows significant improvements over the DEDM predictions of the resolved and SGS quantities.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Rotating turbulence Turbulent Flows: Turbulence modelling Turbulent Flows: Turbulent Flows
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 721 , 25 April 2013 , pp. 541 - 577
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, H. & Antonia, R. A. 2009 Near-wall similarity between velocity and scalar fluctuations in a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 21, 025109.Google Scholar
Baggett, J. S., Jiménez, J. & Kravchenko, A. G. 1997 Resolution requirements in large-eddy simulations of shear flows. In Annual Research Briefs (ed. P. Moin), pp. 51–66. Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Bardina, J., Ferziger, J. H. & Reynolds, W. C. 1989 Improved subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulation. AIAA Paper 80-1357.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1949 Diffusion in a field of homogeneous turbulence. Austral. J. Sci. Res. 2 (4), 437–450.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. & Huang, G. P. 1995 The law of the wall in turbulent flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 451, 165–188.Google Scholar
Canuto, C., Hussaini, M. Y., Quarteroni, A. & Zang, T. A. 1988 Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics. Springer.Google Scholar
Chevalier, M., Schlatter, P., Lundbladh, A. & Henningson, D. S. 2007 SIMSON a pseudo-spectral solver for incompressible boundary layer flows. Tech. Rep. 2007:07. KTH Mechanics, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Choi, H. & Moin, P. 2012 Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman’s estimate revisited. Phys. Fluids 24, 011702.Google Scholar
Chumakov, S. 2008 A priori study of subgrid-scale flux of a passive scalar in isotropic homogeneous turbulence. Phys. Rev. E 78, 036313.Google Scholar
Clark, R. A., Ferziger, J. H. & Reynolds, W. C. 1979 Evaluation of subgrid-scale models using an accurately simulated turbulent flow (part 1). J. Fluid Mech. 91, 1–16.Google Scholar
Davidson, L. 2009 Large eddy simulations: how to evaluate resolution. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 30, 1016–1025.Google Scholar
Debusschere, B. & Rutland, C. J. 2004 Turbulent scalar transport mechanisms in plane channel and Couette flows. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 47, 1771–1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatski, T. B. & Wallin, S. 2004 Extending the weak-equilibrium condition for algebraic Reynolds stress models to rotating and curved flows. J. Fluid Mech. 518, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germano, M. 1992 Turbulence: the filtering approach. J. Fluid Mech. 238, 325–336.Google Scholar
Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P. & Cabot, W. H. 1991 A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A 3 (7), 1760–1765.Google Scholar
Geurts, B. J. & Fröhlich, J. 2002 A framework for predicting accuracy limitations in large-eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 14, L41–L44.Google Scholar
Ghosal, S., Lund, T. S., Moin, P. & Akselvoll, K. 1995 A dynamic localization model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 286, 229–255.Google Scholar
Grundestam, O., Wallin, S. & Johansson, A. V. 2005 An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model based on a nonlinear pressure strain rate model. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 26, 732–745.Google Scholar
Higgins, C. W., Parlange, M. B. & Meneveau, C. 2004 The heat flux and the temperature gradient in the lower atmosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L22105.Google Scholar
Jiménez, C., Ducros, F., Cuenot, B. & Bédat, B. 2001a Subgrid scale variance and dissipation of a scalar field in large eddy simulations. Phys. Fluids 13, 1748–1754.Google Scholar
Jiménez, C., Valiño, L. & Dopazo, C. 2001b A priori and a posteriori tests of subgrid scale models for scalar transport. Phys. Fluids 13, 2433–2436.Google Scholar
Johansson, A. V. & Wikström, P. M. 1999 DNS and modelling of passive scalar transport in turbulent channel flow with a focus on scalar dissipation rate modelling. Flow Turbul. Combust. 63, 223–245.Google Scholar
Kader, B. A. & Yaglom, A. M. 1972 Heat and mass transfer laws for fully turbulent wall flows. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 15, 2329–2351.Google Scholar
Kang, H. S. & Meneveau, C. 2001 Passive scalar anisotropy in a heated turbulent wake: new observations and implications for large-eddy simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 442, 161–170.Google Scholar
Kang, H. S. & Meneveau, C. 2002 Universality of large eddy simulation model parameters across a turbulent wake behind a heated cylinder. J. Turbul. 3, N32.Google Scholar
Kawamura, H., Ohsaka, K., Abe, H. & Yamamoto, K. 1998 DNS of turbulent heat transfer in channel flow with low to medium-high Prandtl number fluid. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 19, 482–491.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133–166.Google Scholar
Lesieur, M. & Métais, O. 1996 New trends in large-eddy simulations of turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 28, 45–82.Google Scholar
Li, B.-Y., Liu, N.-S. & Lu, X.-Y. 2006 Direct numerical simulation of wall-normal rotating turbulent channel flow with heat transfer. Intl. J. Heat Mass Transfer 49, 1162–1175.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1992 A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Phys. Fluids A 4 (3), 633–635.Google Scholar
Lundbladh, A., Henningson, D. S. & Johansson, A. V. 2004 An efficient spectral integration method for the solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. Tech. Rep. Aeronautical Research Institute of Sweden, Bromma.Google Scholar
Marstorp, L., Brethouwer, G., Grundestam, O. & Johansson, A. V. 2009 Explicit algebraic subgrid stress models with application to rotating channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 639, 403–432.Google Scholar
Marstorp, L., Brethouwer, G. & Johansson, A. V. 2007 A stochastic subgrid model with application to turbulent flow and scalar mixing. Phys. Fluids 19, 035107.Google Scholar
Mehdizadeh, A. & Oberlack, M. 2010 Analytical and numerical investigations of laminar and turbulent Poiseuille–Ekman flow at different rotation rates. Phys. Fluids 22, 105104.Google Scholar
Meneveau, C. 1994 Statistics of turbulence subgrid-scale stresses: necessary conditions and experimental tests. Phys. Fluids 6, 815–833.Google Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Katz, J. 2000 Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 1–32.Google Scholar
Meneveau, C., Lund, T. S. & Cabot, W. H. 1996 A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 319, 353–385.Google Scholar
Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1982 Numerical investigation of turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 118, 341–377.Google Scholar
Moin, P., Squires, K., Cabot, W. & Lee, S. 1991 A dynamic subgrid-scale model for compressible turbulence and scalar transport. Phys. Fluids A 3, 2746–2757.Google Scholar
Monin, P. S. 1965 On the symmetry of turbulence in the surface layer of air. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 1, 45–54.Google Scholar
Moser, R. D., Kim, J. & Mansour, N. N. 1999 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to $R{e}_{\tau } = 590$ . Phys. Fluids 11 (4), 943–945.Google Scholar
Oberlack, M., Cabot, W., Petterson Reif, B. A. & Weller, T. 2006 Group analysis, direct numerical simulation and modelling of a turbulent channel flow with streamwise rotation. J. Fluid Mech. 562, 383–403.Google Scholar
Peng, S.-H. & Davidson, L. 2002 On a subgrid-scale heat flux model for large eddy simulation of turbulent thermal flow. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 45, 1393–1405.Google Scholar
Piomelli, U. & Liu, J. 1995 Large eddy simulation of rotating channel flows using a localized dynamic model. Phys. Fluids 7 (4), 839–848.Google Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porté-agel, F., Pahlow, M., Meneveau, C. & Parlange, M. B. 2001a Atmospheric stability effect on subgrid-scale physics for large-eddy simulation. Adv. Water Resour. 24, 1085–1102.Google Scholar
Porté-agel, F., Parlange, M. B., Meneveau, C. & Eichinger, W. E. 2001b A priori field study of the subgrid-scale heat fluxes and dissipation in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 58, 2673–2698.Google Scholar
Rasam, A., Brethouwer, G., Schlatter, P., Li, Q. & Johansson, A. V. 2011a Effects of modelling, resolution and anisotropy of subgrid-scales on large eddy simulations of channel flow. J. Turbul. 12, N10.Google Scholar
Rasam, A., Brethouwer, G., Wallin, S. & Johansson, A. V. 2011b Stochastic and non-stochastic explicit algebraic models for LES. In Proc. 7th Intl Symp. on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Ottawa, Canada.  http://www.tsfp7.org/papers/7A2P.pdf.Google Scholar
Rodi, W. 1972 The prediction of free turbulent boundary layers by use of a two equation model of turbulence. PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Rodi, W. 1976 A new algebraic relation for calculating the Reynolds stresses. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 56, T219.Google Scholar
Sagaut, P. 2010 Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows: An Introduction, 3rd edn. Springer.Google Scholar
Salvetti, M. V. & Banerjee, S. 1995 A priori tests of a new dynamic subgrid-scale model for finite-difference large-eddy simulations. Phys. Fluids 7, 2831–2847.Google Scholar
Shih, T. H. & Lumley, J. L. 1986 Second-order modelling of near-wall turbulence. Phys. Fluids 29 (4), 971–975.Google Scholar
Sjögren, T. & Johansson, A. V. 2000 Development and calibration of algebraic nonlinear models for terms in the Reynolds stress transport equations. Phys. Fluids 12, 1554–1572.Google Scholar
Tafti, D. K. & Vanka, S. P. 1991 A numerical study of the effects of spanwise rotation on turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids A 3, 642–656.Google Scholar
Tsubokura, M., Kobayashi, T., Taniguchi, N. & Kogaki, T. 1999 Subgrid scale modelling for turbulence in rotating reference frames. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 81, 361–375.Google Scholar
Voke, P. R. 1996 Subgrid-scale modelling at low mesh Reynolds number. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 8, 131–143.Google Scholar
Wallin, S. & Johansson, A. V. 2000 An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for incompressible and compressible turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 403, 89–132.Google Scholar
Wallin, S. & Johansson, A. V. 2002 Modelling streamline curvature effects in explicit algebraic Reynolds stress turbulence models. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 23, 721–730.Google Scholar
Wang, B.-C., Yee, E., Bergstrom, D. J. & Iida, O. 2008 New dynamic subgrid-scale heat flux models for large-eddy simulation of thermal convection based on the general gradient diffusion hypothesis. J. Fluid Mech. 604, 125–163.Google Scholar
Wikström, P. M., Wallin, S. & Johansson, A. V. 2000 Derivation and investigation of a new algebraic model for the passive scalar flux. Phys. Fluids 12, 688–702.Google Scholar
Winckelmans, G. S., Jeanmart, H. & Carati, D. 2002 On the comparison of turbulence intensities from large-eddy simulation with those from experiment or direct numerical simulation. Phys. Fluids A 14, 1809–1811.Google Scholar
Wu, H. & Kasagi, N. 2004 Turbulent heat transfer in a channel flow with arbitrary directional system rotation. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 47, 4579–4591.Google Scholar
Yoshizawa, A. 1988 Statistical modelling of passive-scalar diffusion in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 541–555.Google Scholar
Yoshizawa, A., Tsubokura, M., Kobayashi, T. & Taniguchi, N. 1996 Modelling of the dynamic subgrid-scale viscosity in large eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 8, 2254–2256.Google Scholar