Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:40:41.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acoustic implications of a thin viscous boundary layer over a compliant surface or permeable liner

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

E. J. BRAMBLEY
E. J. BRAMBLEY*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers the implications of a high-Reynolds-number thin parallel boundary layer on fluid–solid interaction. Two types of boundaries are considered: a compliant boundary which is flexible but impermeable, such as an elastic sheet or elastic solid, and a permeable boundary which is rigidly fixed, such as a perforated rigid sheet. The fluid flow consists of a steady flow along the boundary and a small time-dependent perturbation, with the boundary reacting to the perturbation. The fluid displacement due to the perturbation is assumed to be much smaller than the boundary-layer thickness. The analysis is equally valid for compressible and incompressible fluids. Numerical examples are given for compressible flow along a cylindrical duct, for both permeable and compliant cylinder walls. The difference between compliant and permeable walls is shown to be dramatic in some cases. High- and low-frequency asymptotics are derived, and shown to compare well to the numerics. When used with a mass–spring–damper boundary, this model is shown to lead to similar, but not identical, temporal instability with unbounded growth rate to that seen for slipping flow using the Myers boundary condition. It is therefore suggested that a regularization of the Myers boundary condition removing the unbounded growth rate may lead to, or at least inform, a regularization of the model presented here.

JFM classification

Acoustics: Aeroacoustics Compressible Flows: Compressible Flows
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 678 , 10 July 2011 , pp. 348 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahams, I. D. & Wickham, G. R. 2001 On transient oscillations of plates in moving fluids. Wave Motion 33, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1964 Handbook of Mathematical Functions, 9th edn. Dover.Google Scholar
Anderson, E., Bai, Z., Bischof, C., Blackford, S., Demmel, J., Dongarra, J., Du Croz, J., Greenbaum, A., Hammarling, S., McKenney, A. & Sorensen, D. 1999 LAPACK Users' Guide. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
Aurégan, Y., Starobinski, R. & Pagneux, V. 2001 Influence of grazing flow and dissipation effects on the acoustic boundary conditions at a lined wall. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambley, E. J. 2009 Fundamental problems with the model of uniform flow over acoustic linings. J. Sound Vib. 322, 1026–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambley, E. J. 2011 A well-posed boundary condition for acoustic liners in straight ducts with flow. AIAA J. doi:10.2514/1.J050723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambley, E. J. & Peake, N. 2006 Classification of aeroacoustically relevant surface modes in cylindrical lined ducts. Wave Motion 43, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambley, E. J. & Peake, N. 2008 Stability and acoustic scattering in a cylindrical thin shell containing compressible mean flow. J. Fluid Mech. 602, 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazier-Smith, P. R. & Scott, J. F. 1984 Stability of fluid flow in the presence of a compliant surface. Wave Motion 6, 547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, L. M. B. C. & Serrão, P. G. T. A. 1998 On the acoustics of an exponential boundary layer. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 356, 2335–2378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crighton, D. G. & Oswell, J. E. 1991 Fluid loading with mean flow. I. Response of an elastic plate to localized excitation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 335, 557–592.Google Scholar
Eversman, W. 1971 Effect of boundary layer on the transmission and attenuation of sound in an acoustically treated circular duct. AIAA J. 49 (5), 1372–1380.Google Scholar
Eversman, W. & Beckemeyer, R. J. 1972 Transmission of sound in ducts with thin shear layers – convergence to the uniform flow case. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 216–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. & Rice, E. 1973 Effect of shear on duct wall impedance. J. Sound Vib. 30, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinch, E. J. 1991 Perurbation Methods. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. S. 1977 The scattering of sound by a simple shear layer. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 284, 287–328.Google Scholar
Koch, W. & Möhring, W. 1983 Eigensolutions for liners in uniform mean flow ducts. AIAA J. 21 (2), 200–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1987 Fluid Mechanics, 2nd edn. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lucey, A. D., Sen, P. K. & Carpenter, P. W. 2003 Excitation and evolution of waves on an inhomogeneous flexible wall in a mean flow. J. Fluids Struct. 18, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariano, S. 1971 Effect of wall shear layers on the sound attenuation in acoustically lined rectangular ducts. J. Sound Vib. 19, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mungur, P. & Plumblee, H. E. 1969 Propagation and attenuation of sound in a soft-walled annular duct containing a sheared flow. NASA SP-207, 305–327.Google Scholar
Myers, M. K. 1980 On the acoustic boundary condition in the presence of flow. J. Sound Vib. 71, 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, R. T. & Brand, R. S. 1982 Boundary layer effects on sound in a circular duct. J. Sound Vib. 85, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayfeh, A. H. 1973 Effect of the acoustic boundary layer on the wave propagation in ducts. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 1737–1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peake, N. 1997 On the behaviour of a fluid-loaded cylindrical shell with mean flow. J. Fluid Mech. 338, 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prangsma, G. J., Alberga, A. H. & Beenakker, J. J. M. 1973 Ultrasonic determination of the volume viscosity of N2, CO, CH4 and CD4 between 77 and 300 K. Physica 64, 278–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pridmore-Brown, D. C. 1958 Sound propagation in a fluid flowing through an attenuating duct. J. Fluid Mech. 4, 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renou, Y. & Aurégan, Y. 2010 On a modified Myers boundary condition to match lined wall impedance deduced from several experimental methods in presence of a grazing flow. AIAA Paper 2010-3945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, E. J. 1969 Propagation of waves in an acoustically lined duct with a mean flow. NASA Tech. Rep. SP-207.Google Scholar
Richter, C. & Thiele, F. H. 2007 The stability of time explicit impedance models. AIAA Paper 2007-3538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rienstra, S. W. 2003 A classification of duct modes based on surface waves. Wave Motion 37, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rienstra, S. W. 2007 Acoustic scattering at a hard–soft lining transition in a flow duct. J. Engng Maths 59, 451–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rienstra, S. W. & Peake, N. 2005 Modal scattering at an impedance transition in a lined flow duct. AIAA Paper 2005-2852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, K. F., Hobson, M. P. & Bence, S. J. 2002 Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering, 2nd edn. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1968 Boundary-Layer Theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Auriault, L. 1996 Time-domain impedance boundary conditions for computational aeroacoustics. AIAA J. 34 (5), 917–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tester, B. J. 1973 Some aspects of ‘sound’ attenuation in lined ducts containing inviscid mean flows with boundary layers. J. Sound Vib. 28, 217–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilenski, G. G. & Rienstra, S. W. 2007 On hydrodynamic and acoustic modes in a ducted shear flow with wall lining. J. Fluid Mech. 583, 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar