Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:33:19.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trading Patterns and Market Integration in Overlapping Experimental Asset Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2016

Patricia Chelley-Steeley
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Birmingham, Birmingham Business School, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
Brian Kluger*
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Cincinnati, Lindner College of Business, Cincinnati, OH 45221
James Steeley
Affiliation:
[email protected], Keele University, Keele Management School, Keele ST5 5BG, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper examines trading patterns and market integration using laboratory asset markets. Our markets are designed to approximately correspond to the trading day for stocks cross-listed in markets in Europe and North America. Some of our markets feature timing restrictions so that participants cannot trade across markets except during a fully integrated overlap period. Comparison of markets with and without timing restrictions shows that restrictions reduce trading activity and shift transactions to the overlap period. When asset values are extreme, price discovery can be impeded when trading restrictions exist. The measurement of liquidity suggests that trading restrictions increase overall spreads.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackert, L. F.; Mazzotta, S.; and Qi, L.. “An Experimental Investigation of Asset Pricing in Segmented Markets.” Southern Economic Journal, 77 (2011), 585598.Google Scholar
Admati, A. R., and Pfleiderer, P.. “A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability.” Review of Financial Studies, 1 (1988), 340.Google Scholar
Admati, A. R., and Pfleiderer, P.. “Divide and Conquer: A Theory of Intraday and Day-of-the-Week Mean Effects.” Review of Financial Studies, 2 (1989), 189223.Google Scholar
Bacidore, J. M., and Sofianos, G.. “Liquidity Provision and Specialist Trading in NYSE-Listed Non-U.S. Stocks.” Journal of Financial Economics, 63 (2002), 133158.Google Scholar
Barner, M.; Feri, F.; and Plott, C. R.. “On the Microstructure of Price Determination and Information Aggregation with Sequential Information Arrival in an Experimental Asset Market.” Annals of Finance, 1 (2005), 73107.Google Scholar
Baruch, S.; Karolyi, G. A.; and Lemmon, M.. “Multimarket Trading and Liquidity: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 21692200.Google Scholar
Bessembinder, H.; Chan, K.; and Seguin, P.. “An Empirical Examination of Information, Differences of Opinion, and Trading Activity.” Journal of Financial Economics, 40 (1996), 105134.Google Scholar
Biais, B., and Martinez, I.. “Price Discovery across the Rhine.” Review of Finance, 8 (2004), 4974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, R.; O’Hara, M.; and Saar, G.. “The ‘Make or Take’ Decision in an Electronic Market: Evidence on the Evolution of Liquidity.” Journal of Financial Economics, 75 (2005), 165199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, R.; O’Hara, M.; and Saar, G.. “How Noise Trading Affects Markets: An Experimental Analysis.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 22752302.Google Scholar
Chowdhry, B., and Nanda, V.. “Multimarket Trading and Market Liquidity.” Review of Financial Studies, 4 (1991), 623656.Google Scholar
De Jong, F.; Nijman, T.; and Roell, A.. “A Comparison of the Cost of Trading French Shares on the Paris Bourse and on SEAQ International.” European Economic Review, 39 (1995), 12771301.Google Scholar
Eun, C., and Sabherwal, S.. “Cross-Border Listings and Price Discovery: Evidence from U.S.-Listed Canadian Stocks.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 549574.Google Scholar
Fischbacher, U. “z-Tree: A Toolbox for Ready-Made Economic Experiments.” Experimental Economics, 10 (2007), 171178.Google Scholar
Foerster, S. R., and Karolyi, G. A.. “The Effects of Market Segmentation and Investor Recognition on Asset Prices: Evidence from Foreign Stock Listing in the United States.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 9811013.Google Scholar
Foster, F. D., and Viswanathan, S.. “A Theory of the Intraday Variations in Volume, Variance and Trading Costs in Securities Markets.” Review of Financial Studies, 3 (1990), 593624.Google Scholar
Foster, F. D., and Viswanathan, S.. “Variations in Trading Volume, Return Volatility, and Trading Costs: Evidence on Recent Price Formation Models.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 187211.Google Scholar
Grammig, J.; Melvin, M.; and Schlag, C.. “The Role of U.S. Trading in Pricing Internationally Cross-Listed Stocks.” Working Paper, Arizona State University (2005).Google Scholar
Hamao, Y., and Hasbrouck, J.. “Securities Trading in the Absence of Dealers: Trades and Quotes on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.” Review of Financial Studies, 3 (1995), 849878.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. L. “Marketplace Fragmentation, Competition, and the Efficiency of the Stock Exchange.” Journal of Finance, 34 (1979), 171187.Google Scholar
Hargis, K. “International Cross-Listing and Stock Market Development in Emerging Economies.” International Review of Economics and Finance, 9 (2000), 101122.Google Scholar
Hupperets, E., and Menkveld, A. J.. “Intraday Analysis of Market Integration: Dutch Blue Chips Traded in Amsterdam and New York.” Journal of Financial Markets, 5 (2002), 5782.Google Scholar
Karolyi, G. A. “The World of Cross-Listings and Cross-Listings of the World: Challenging Conventional Wisdom.” Review of Finance, 10 (2006), 99152.Google Scholar
Kim, O., and Verrecchia, R. E.. “Market Reactions to Anticipated Announcements.” Journal of Financial Economics, 30 (1991), 273310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, A. S. “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading.” Econometrica, 53 (1985), 13151335.Google Scholar
McInish, T. H., and Wood, R. A.. “An Analysis of Transactions Data for the Toronto Stock Exchange: Return Patterns and End-of-the-Day Effect.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 14 (1990), 441458.Google Scholar
McInish, T. H., and Wood, R. A.. “An Analysis of Intraday Patterns in Bid/Ask Spread for NYSE Stocks.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 753764.Google Scholar
Menkveld, A. J. “Splitting Orders in Fragmented Markets: Evidence from Cross-Listed Stocks.” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17 (2008), 145174.Google Scholar
Moulton, P. C., and Wei, L.. “A Tale of Two Time Zones: The Impact of Substitutes on Cross-Listed Stock Liquidity.” Journal of Financial Markets, 12 (2009), 570591.Google Scholar
O’Hara, M. Market Microstructure Theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing (1995).Google Scholar
Pagano, M., and Roell, A.. “Trading Systems in European Stock Exchanges: Current Performance and Policy Options.” Economic Policy, 8 (1990), 3558.Google Scholar
Qi, L., and Ochs, J.. “Information Use and Transference among Legally Separated Share Markets: An Experimental Approach.” Southern Economic Journal, 76 (2009), 99129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnitzlein, C. “Call and Continuous Trading Mechanisms under Asymmetric Information: An Experimental Investigation.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 613636.Google Scholar
Schnitzlein, C. “Price Formation and Market Quality When the Number and Presence of Insiders Is Unknown.” Review of Financial Studies, 15 (2002), 10771109.Google Scholar
Solnik, B. International Investments. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley (1996).Google Scholar
Sunder, S. “Experimental Asset Markets: A Survey.” In The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Kagel, J. and Roth, A., eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (1995).Google Scholar
Werner, I. M., and Kleidon, A. W.. “U.K. and U.S. Trading of British Cross-Listed Stocks: An Intraday Analysis of Market Integration.” Review of Financial Studies, 9 (1996), 619664.Google Scholar
Wood, R. A.; McInish, T.; and Ord, J. K.. “An Investigation of Transactions Data for NYSE Stocks.” Journal of Finance, 40 (1985), 723741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar