Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:29:34.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technological Fit and the Market for Managerial Talent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2022

Fred Bereskin Open the ORCID record for Fred Bereskin [Opens in a new window] ,
Seong K. Byun  and
Jong-Min Oh
Fred Bereskin
Affiliation:
University of Missouri Trulaske College of Business [email protected]
Seong K. Byun
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Business Administration [email protected]
Jong-Min Oh*
Affiliation:
SungKyunKwan University SKK Business School
*
[email protected] (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that the similarity of a firm’s technological expertise with that of other firms affects managerial labor market outcomes. Using each firm’s patent portfolio to estimate its technological expertise, we find that its similarity in technological expertise with other firms is strongly related to the benchmark group used for CEO compensation and job transitions. Furthermore, we show that a firm’s CEO pay is positively associated with the CEO compensation levels of technologically similar firms. Our results thus demonstrate the crucial role of technological similarity in determining the value of outside options and the boundaries of the managerial labor market.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , March 2023 , pp. 837 - 874
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© THE AUTHOR(S), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Footnotes

We thank an anonymous referee, Melissa Frye, Vladimir Gatchev, Jarrad Harford (the editor), John Howe, Po-Hsuan Hsu, Sima Jannati, Stefano Sacchetto, Henri Servaes, Qinghai Wang, Jessica West, Chi Zhang, and seminar and conference participants at the 2020 Financial Management Association Conference, 2020 Annual Conference of the Asia-Pacific Association of Derivatives, 2020 Conference on Asia-Pacific Financial Markets (CAFM), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Korea University, Seoul National University, University of Central Florida, University of Mississippi, University of Missouri, University of Seoul, University of Sydney, and Virginia Commonwealth University for valuable comments. Jong-Min Oh gratefully acknowledges financial support from the JOONGBONG Research Fund, SKK Business School.

References

Albuquerque, A. M. “Do Growth-Option Firms Use Less Relative Performance Evaluation?” Accounting Review, 89 (2014), 27–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albuquerque, A. M.; De Franco, G.; and Verdi, R. S.. “Peer Choice in CEO Compensation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 160–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altonji, J. G.; Elder, T. E.; and Taber, C. R.. “An Evaluation of Instrumental Variable Strategies for Estimating the Effects of Catholic Schooling.” Journal of Human Resources, 40 (2005a), 791–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altonji, J. G.; Elder, T. E.; and Taber, C. R.. “Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools.” Journal of Political Economy, 113 (2005b), 151–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babenko, I.; Du, F.; and Tserlukevich, Y.. “Will I Get Paid? Employee Stock Options and Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56 (2021), 29–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balsmeier, B.; Fleming, L.; and Manso, G.. “Independent Boards and Innovation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 123 (2017), 536–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranchuk, N.; Kiescnick, R.; and Moussawi, R.. “Motivating Innovation in Newly Public Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 111 (2014), 573–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, T. W.; Kahle, K. M.; and Stulz, R. M.. “Why Do US Firms Hold So Much More Cash Than They Used To?” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 1985–2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, L.; Cohen, A.; and Ferrell, A.. “What Matters in Corporate Governance?” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 783–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, L., and Fried, J.. Pay Without Performance: The Unfilled Promise of Executive Compensation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (2004).Google Scholar
Bena, J., and Li, K.. “Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 1923–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhgwat, V.; Dam, R.; and Harford, J.. “The Real Effects of Uncertainty on Merger Activity.” Review of Financial Studies, 29 (2016), 3000–3034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizjak, J.; Kalpathy, S.; Li, F. Z.; and Young, B.. “The Choice of Peers for Relative Performance Evaluation in Executive Compensation.” Review of Finance, https://academic.oup.com/rof/advance-article/doi/10.1093/rof/rfac016/6564240 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizjak, J. M.; Lemmon, M. L.; and Naveen, L.. “Does the Use of Peer Groups Contribute to Higher Pay and Less Efficient Compensation?” Journal of Financial Economics, 90 (2008), 152–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizjak, J. M.; Lemmon, M. L., and Nguyen, T.. “Are All CEOs Above Average? An Empirical Analysis of Compensation Peer Groups and Pay Design.” Journal of Financial Economics, 100 (2011), 538–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, N.; Schankerman, M.; and Van Reenen, J.. “Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry.” Econometrica, 81 (2013), 1347–1393.Google Scholar
Bowen, D. E. III; Fresard, L.; and Hoberg, G.. “Rapidly Evolving Technologies and Startup Exits.” Management Science, forthcoming, 2022.Google Scholar
Brӧring, S. “Developing Innovation Strategies for Convergence – Is ‘Open Innovation’ Imperative?” International Journal of Technology Management, 49 (2010), 272–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brӧring, S.; Cloutier, M.; and Leker, J.. “The Front End of Innovation in An Era of Industry Convergence: Evidence from Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods.” R&D Management, 36 (2006), 487–498.Google Scholar
Burgelman, R., and Thomas, J.. “How Cross-Boundary Disruption-from-Above Superseded Incumbents’ Sustaining Innovation in the Mobile Industry: Qualitative, Graphical and Computational Insights.” Working Paper, Stanford University (2018).Google Scholar
Byun, S. K.; Oh, J. M.; and Xia, H.. “Incremental Versus Breakthrough Innovation: The Role of Technology Spillovers.” Management Science, 67 (2021), 1779–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadman, B., and Carter, M. E.. “Compensation Peer Groups and Their Relation with CEO Pay.” Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26 (2014), 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Call, A. E.; Martin, G. S.; Sharp, N. Y.; and Wilde, J. H.. “Whistleblowers and Outcomes of Financial Misrepresentation Enforcement Actions.” Journal of Accounting Research, 56 (2018), 123–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, S.; Ma, G.; Tucker, J.; and Wan, C.. “Technological Peer Pressure and Product Disclosure.” Accounting Review, 93 (2018), 95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, W.; Jung, S.; Peng, X.; and Zhang, I.. “Outside Opportunities, Managerial Risk Taking, and CEO Compensation.” Accounting Review, 97 (2022), 135–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, J.; Du, F.; and Xie, D.. “Compensation Peer Choice and Managerial Capital.” Working Paper, University of Utah (2018).Google Scholar
Coles, J.; Li, Z.; and Wang, A.. “Industry Tournament Incentives.” Review of Financial Studies, 31 (2018), 1418–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coon, F. “The Evolving Executive: Five Skills All Modern CEOs Should Have.” Forbes, March 29, available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2017/03/29/the-evolving-executive-five-skills-all-modern-ceos-should-have/?sh=393643db5d14 (2017).Google Scholar
Cremers, K. J. M., and Grinstein, Y.. “Does the Market for CEO Talent Explain Controversial CEO Pay Practices?” Review of Finance, 18 (2014), 921–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouzet, N., and Eberly, J. C.. “Understanding Weak Capital Investment: The Role of Market Concentration and Intangibles.” Working Paper, Northwestern University (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, T., and Knott, A.. “Outside CEOs and Innovation.” Strategic Management Journal, 39 (2018), 2095–2119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunat, V., and Guadalupe, M.. “Globalization and the Provision of Incentives Inside the Firm: The Effect of Foreign Competition.” Journal of Labor Economics, 27 (2009), 179–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custodio, C.; Ferreira, M. A.; and Matos, P.. “Generalists Versus Specialists: Lifetime Work Experience and Chief Executive Officer Pay.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 471–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cziraki, P., and Jenter, D.. “The Market for CEOs.” Working Paper, University of Toronto (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Angelis, D., and Grinstein, Y.. “Relative Performance Evaluation in CEO Compensation: A Talent-Retention Explanation.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55 (2020), 2099–2123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, D. K.; Jochem, T.; and Rajamani, A.. “Shareholder Governance and CEO Compensation: The Peer Effects of Say on Pay.” Review of Financial Studies, 33 (2020), 3130–3173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döttling, R., and Perotti, E.. “Redistributive Growth.” Working Paper, Rotterdam School of Management (2019).Google Scholar
Edmans, A., and Gabaix, X.. “Executive Compensation: A Modern Primer.” Journal of Economic Literature, 54 (2016), 1232–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst & Young. “Convergence.” The Biotechnology Industry Report (2000).Google Scholar
Faulkender, M., and Yang, J.. “Inside the Black Box: The Role and Composition of Compensation Peer Groups.” Journal of Financial Economics, 96 (2010), 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, E. R., and Montgomery, C. A.. “Are Incentives without Expertise Sufficient? Evidence from Fortune 500 Firms.” Strategic Management Journal, 36 (2015), 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fich, E. M.; Liu, T.; and Officer, M. S.. “How Do Equity Analysts Impact Takeovers?” Working Paper, Drexel University (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flammer, C., and Kacperczyk, A.. “Corporate Social Responsibility as a Defense Against Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine.” Strategic Management Journal, 40 (2019), 1243–1267.Google Scholar
Francis, B.; Hasan, I.; Mani, S.; and Pengfei, Y.. “Relative Peer Quality and Firm Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 122 (2016), 196–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, K. A. “Impact of a Confounding Variable on a Regression Coefficient.” Sociological Methods & Research, 29 (2000), 147–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frydman, C. “Rising Through the Ranks: The Evolution of the Market for Corporate Executives, 1936–2003.” Management Science, 65 (2019), 4951–4979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frydman, C., and Papanikolau, D.. “In Search of Ideas: Technological Innovation and Executive Pay Inequality.” Journal of Financial Economics, 130 (2018), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaix, X., and Landier, A.. “Why Has CEO Pay Increased So Much?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123 (2008), 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendening, M.; Mauldin, E. G.; and Shaw, K. M.. “Determinants and Consequences of Quantitative Critical Accounting Estimate Disclosures.” Accounting Review, 94 (2019), 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, G.; Li, L. Y.; and Shin, J. Y.. “Relative Performance Evaluation and Related Peer Groups in Executive Compensation Contracts.” Accounting Review, 86 (2011), 1007–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Uribe, J., and Groen-Xu, M.. “CEO Contract Horizon and Innovation.” Working Paper, London School of Economics (2017).Google Scholar
Gopalan, R.; Milbourn, T.; and Song, F.. “Strategic Flexibility and the Optimality of Pay for Sector Performance.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 2060–2098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, L.; Huang, R.; Mao, Y.; and Tian, X.. “How Does Human Capital Matter? Evidence from Venture Capital.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, forthcoming (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D., and Helfat, C.. “Specificity of CEO Human Capital and Compensation.” Strategic Management Journal, 18 (1997), 895–920.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoberg, G., and Phillips, G.. “Product Market Synergies and Competition in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Text-Based Analysis.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 3773–3811.Google Scholar
Hoberg, G., and Phillips, G.. “Text-Based Network Industries and Endogenous Product Differentiation.” Journal of Political Economy, 124 (2016), 1423–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBM. Redefining Boundaries – Insights from The Global C-Suite Studies. New York: IBM Institute for Business Value (2015).Google Scholar
Islam, I.; Rahman, L.; Sen, R.; and Zein, J.. “Eyes on the Prize: Do Industry Tournament Incentives Shape the Structure of Executive Compensation?” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, forthcoming (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. B. “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits and Market Value.” American Economic Review, 76 (1986), 984–1001.Google Scholar
Jayaraman, S.; Milbourn, T.; Peters, F.; and Seo, H.. “Product Market Peers and Relative Performance Evaluation.” Accounting Review, 96 (2021), 341–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahle, K. M., and Stulz, R. M.. “Is the US Public Corporation in Trouble?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31 (2017), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kedia, S., and Rajgopal, S.. “Neighborhood Matters: The Impact of Location on Broad Based Stock Option Plans.” Journal of Financial Economics, 92 (2009), 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klasa, S.; Ortiz-Molina, H.; Serfling, M.; and Srinivasan, S.. “Protection of Trade Secrets and Capital Structure Decisions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 128 (2018), 266–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, L.; Papanikolaou, D.; Seru, A.; and Stoffman, N.. “Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132 (2017), 665–712.Google Scholar
Larcker, D.; McClure, C.; and Zhu, C.. “Peer Group Choice, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance.” Working Paper, Stanford University (2021).Google Scholar
Larcker, D., and Rusticus, T. O.. “On the Use of Instrumental Variables in Accounting Research.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49 (2010), 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. M. C.; Sun, S. T.; Wang, R.; and Zhang, R.. “Technological Links and Predictable Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 132 (2019), 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, D. “Industry Evolution and Competence Development: The Imperatives of Technological Convergence.” International Journal of Technology Management, 19 (2000), 699–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, I. and Nguyen, D. D.. “Hometown Lending.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56 (2021), 2894–2933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C.; Wei, L.; and Yang, N.. “Labor Market Immobility and Incentive Contract Design.” Working Paper, University of Hong Kong (2020).Google Scholar
Ma, M.; Pan, J.; and Stubben, S. R.. “The Effect of Local Tournament Incentives on Firms’ Performance, Risk-Taking Decisions, and Financial Reporting Decisions.” Accounting Review, 95 (2020), 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinsey. Competing in a World of Sectors Without Borders. McKinsey Quarterly (2017).Google Scholar
McLemore, P.; Sias, R., Wan, C.; and Yuskel, H. Z.. “Active Technological Similarity and Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, forthcoming (2022).Google Scholar
Na, K. “CEOs’ Outside Opportunities and Relative Performance Evaluation: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Journal of Financial Economics, 137 (2020), 679–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oster, E. “Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 37 (2019), 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y. “The Determinants and Impact of Executive-Firm Matches.” Management Science, 63 (2017), 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, J., and Wan, C.. “Technology Spillovers and Corporate Cash Holdings.” Journal of Financial Economics, 115 (2015), 558–573.Google Scholar
Qiu, J.; Wang, J.; and Zhou, Y.. “Technology and Return Predictability.” Working Paper, McMaster University (2018).Google Scholar
Rao, V. “Great CEOs Must Be Either Technical or Financial.” Forbes, March 9, available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/venkateshrao/2012/03/09/great-ceos-must-be-either-technical-or-financial/?sh=35e8fc0763c6 (2012).Google Scholar
Skonnard, A. “Why Tech-Savvy CEOs Rule the World.” Inc., September 16, available at https://www.inc.com/aaron-skonnard/why-tech-savvy-ceos-rule-the-world.html (2014).Google Scholar
Tervio, M. “The Difference That CEOs Make: An Assignment Model Approach.” American Economic Review, 98 (2008), 642–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonker, S. E. “Geography and the Market for CEOs.” Management Science, 63 (2017), 609–630.Google Scholar
Zhao, H. “Executive Labor Market Segmentation: How Local Market Density Affects Incentives and Performance.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 50 (2018), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Bereskin et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Bereskin et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 191.9 KB