Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:19:55.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Evidence on the Effect of Company Size on the Cost of Equity Capital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

W. W. Alberts  and
S. H. Archer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The objective of this paper is to carry out tests of the general hypothesis, most recently urged by Scherer [14, pp. 100–102] and Weston and Brigham [17, p. 689], that the cost-of-equity capital of small industrial corporations is greater than that of large industrial corporations. The paper denotes this cost as ke and defines it as the expected rate of return on the stock of a company when the current price of the stock is in equilibrium. A common designation of ke of course is the equity capitalization rate. It will be noted that this definition of the cost-of-equity capital abstracts from the flotation costs that are usually incurred when companies sell new stock. Archer and Faerber [2] have already shown that these costs are inversely related to the size of companies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , March 1973 , pp. 229 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Alexander, S. “The Effect of Size of Manufacturing Corporations on the Distribution of the Rate of Return.” Review of Economics and Statistics, August 1949, pp. 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Archer, S. H., and Faerber, L. G.. “Firm Size and the Cost of Externally Secured Equity Capital.” Journal of Finance, March 1966, pp. 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Benishay, H. “Variability in Earnings-Price Ratios of Corporate Equities.” American Economic Review, March 1961, pp. 81–94.Google Scholar
[4]Brigham, E. F., and Smith, K. V.. “Cost of Capital to the Small Firm.” The Engineering Economist, Fall 1967, pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Ferguson, C. E.A Macroeconomic Theory of Workable Competition. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
[6]Francis, C. J., and Archer, S. H.. Portfolio Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
[7]Gordon, M. J.The Investment, Financing and Valuation of the Corporation. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1962.Google Scholar
[8]Hall, M., and Weiss, L. W.. “Firm Size and Profitability.” Review of Economics and Statistics, August 1967, pp. 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Lintner, J. “Expectations, Mergers, and Equilibrium in Purely Competitive Securities Markets.” American Economic Review, May 1971, pp. 101–111.Google Scholar
[10]Litzenberger, R. H., and Budd, A. P.. “Corporate Investment Criteria and the Valuation of Risk Assets.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, December 1970, pp. 395–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Miller, M. H., and Modigliani, F.. “Some Estimates of the Cost of Capital to the Electric Utility Industry, 1954–57.” American Economic Review, June 1966, pp. 333–391.Google Scholar
[12]Racette, G. A. Risk and the Required Rate of Return. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, 1972.Google Scholar
[13]Samuels, J. M., and Smyth, D. J.. “Profits, Variability of Profits and Firm Size. Economica, May 1968, pp. 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Scherer, F. M.Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Chicago, Ill.: Rand McNally and Company, 1970.Google Scholar
[15]Sharpe, W. F.Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. New York, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1970.Google Scholar
[16]Steckler, H. O. “The Variability of Profitability with Size of Firm.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, December 1964, pp. 1183–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Weston, J. F., and Brigham, E. F.. Managerial Finance, 3rd ed. New York, N. Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969.Google Scholar