Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:43:51.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk and the Rate of Return on Financial Assets: Some Old Wine in New Bottles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Robert A. Haugen  and
A. James Heins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Strides have been made recently in the discovery and refinement of theoretical models which purport to describe the relationship between asset prices and their risk attributes. (See especially Lintner [13,14,15], Sharpe [19], Mosin [17,18] and Fama [7,8.9].) The models have gained widespread acceptance because of their intuitive appeal and because most reported empirical evidence [1,4,5,11,20,21] allegedly supports their predictive value. It is our purpose to analyze critically one aspect of the nature of this evidence, reveal its inherent weakness, and to design an alternative test to examine the risk-return function. After observing the performance of an extremely large number of issues over long periods of time, we find little support for the notion that risk premiums have, in fact, manifested themselves in realized rates of return.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 10 , Issue 5 , December 1975 , pp. 775 - 784
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Arditti, F. D. “Risk and the Required Return on Equity.” The Journal of Finance, vol. 22 (March 1967), pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Black, F. “Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing.” Journal of Business, vol. 45 (July 1972), pp. 444–454.Google Scholar
[3]Black, F.; Jensen, M. C.; and Scholes, M.. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets (23) edited by Jensen, M. C..Google Scholar
[4]Briscoe, G.; Samuels, J. M.; and Smyth, D. J.. “The Treatment of Risk in the Stock Market.” The Journal of Finance, vol. 24 (September 1969), pp. 707–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Douglas, G. W. “Risk in the Equity Markets: An Empirical Appraisal of Market Efficiency.” Yale Economic Essays, vol. 9 (Spring 1969), pp. 3–45.Google Scholar
[6]Evans, John L., and Archer, Stephen H.. “Diversification and the Reduction of Dispersion: An Empirical Analysis.” The Journal of Finance, vol. 23 (December 1968), pp. 761–767.Google Scholar
[7]Fama, Eugene F. “Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Some Clarifying Comments.” The Journal of Finance, vol. 23 (March 1960), pp. 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Fama, Eugene F. “Multiperiod Consumption-Investment Decisions.” The American Economic Review, vol. 60, no. 1 (March 1970), pp. 163–174.Google Scholar
[9]Fama, Eugene F. “Risk, Return and Equilibrium.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 79, no. 1 (January/February 1971), pp. 30–55.Google Scholar
[10]Fama, Eugene F., and MacBeth, J.. “Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago, July 1972.Google Scholar
[11]Jensen, Michael C. “Risk, the Pricing of Capital Assets and the Evaluation of Investment and Portfolios.” The Journal of Business, vol. 17 (April 1969), pp. 167–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Jensen, Michael C., ed. Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets. New York: Praeger Publishers, forthcoming.Google Scholar
[13]Lintner, John. “Security Price, Risk and Maximal Gains from Diversification.” The Journal of Finance, vol. 19 (December 1965), pp. 587–615.Google Scholar
[14]Lintner, John. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments on Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets-” The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 47 (February 1965), pp. 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Lintner, John. “The Aggregation of Investors' Diverse Judgment and Preferences in Purely Competitive Securities Markets.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 4, no. 4 (December 1969), pp. 347–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Miller, M. H., and Scholes, M.. “Rates of Return in Relation to Risk: A Reexamination of Some Recent Findings.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets (23), edited by Jensen, M. C..Google Scholar
[17]Mossin, J. “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market.” Econometrica (October 1966), pp. 768–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Mossin, J. “Security Pricing and Investment Criteria in Competitive Markets.” The American Economic Review, vol. 59, no. 5 (December 1969), pp. 749–756.Google Scholar
[19]Sharpe, William F. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk” The Journal of Finance, vol. 18 (September 1964), pp. 425–442.Google Scholar
[20]Sharpe, William F. “Risk Aversion in the Stock Market, Some Empirical Evidence. ” The Journal of Finance, vol. 19 (September 1965), pp. 416–422.Google Scholar
[21]Soldofsky, Robert M., and Miller, Roger L.. “Risk Premium Curves for Different Classes of Long-Term Securities, 1950–1966.” The Journal of Finance, vol. 24 (June 1969), pp. 429–445.Google Scholar