Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T08:59:37.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Marketability of Assets and the Price of Risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Extract

One of the remarkable features of the mean-variance capital asset pricing model is its robustness with respect to changes in assumption (Jensen [1]). An example of this property is given by David Mayers [4], who shows that the structure of prices of marketable assets is unaffected by relaxing the assumption that all risky assets are marketable. The result has been used in the analysis of public sector investments by Stapleton and Subrahmanyam [6]. However, although relative prices are unaffected, the general level may be due to the effect of marketability on the market price of risk.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Jensen, Michael C.Capital Markets: Theory and Evidence.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 3 (Autumn 1972), pp. 357398.Google Scholar
[2]Litzenberger, Robert H., and Budd, Alan B.. “A Note on Geometric Mean Portfolio Selection and the Market Values of Equities.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 6 (12 1971), pp. 12771282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Mayers, David. “Non-Marketable Assets, Market Segmentation and the Level of Asset Prices.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 11 (03 1976), pp. 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Mayers, David. “Non-Marketable Assets and Capital Market Equilibrium Under Uncertainty.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, edited by Jensen, M. C.. New York: Praeger (1972).Google Scholar
[5]Mossin, Jan. “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market.” Econometrica, Vol. 34 (10 1966), pp. 768783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Stapleton, Richard C., and Subrahmanyam, Marti G.. “Capital Market Equilibrium in a Mixed Economy, Optimal Public Sector Investment Decision Rules and the Social Rate of Discount.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, (08 1978), p. 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Young, W. E., and Trent, R. H.. “Geometric Mean Approximation of Individual Security and Portfolio Performance.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 4 (06 1969), pp. 179199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar