Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:55:35.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Market Reaction to the Choice of Accounting Method for Stock Splits and Large Stock Dividends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Graeme Rankine
Affiliation:
American Graduate School of International Management, 15249 N. 59th Ave., Glendale, AZ 85306
Earl K. Stice
Affiliation:
School of Business and Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Abstract

Prior research has used inaccurate classification rules to distinguish between stock splits and stock dividends. The CRSP classification of two-for-one stock distributions agrees with the actual accounting treatment only 23% of the time. In addition, the accounting treatment impacts the announcement period reaction—two-for-one distributions accounted for as stock dividends are associated with five-day announcement period returns of 2.70%, significantly greater that the 0.93% announcement returns for distributions accounted for as stock splits. Announcement returns are positively related to earnings growth in the two years following the distribution for stock dividend firms but not for stock split firms. The accounting choice appears to be used to confirm management's private information about future earnings revealed at the time of the distribution announcement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43. New York, NY: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (1953).Google Scholar
Asquith, P.; Healy, P.; and Palepu, K.. “Earnings and Stock Splits.” Accounting Review, 64 (07 1989), 387403.Google Scholar
Atiase, R.Pre-Disclosure Information, Firm Capitalization, and the Security Price Behavior around Earnings Announcements.” Journal of Accounting Research, 23 (Spring 1985), 2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brealey, R. A., and Myers, S. C.. Principles of Corporate Finance, 5th ed., NewYork, NY: McGraw-Hill (1996).Google Scholar
Brennan, M. J., and Copeland, T. E.. “Stock Splits, Stock Prices, and Transaction Costs.” Journal of Financial Economics, 22 (10 1988), 83101.Google Scholar
Brennan, M. J., and Hughes, P. J.. “Stock Prices and the Supply of Information.” Journal of Finance, 46 (12 1991), 16651691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, W.Are Dividend Omissions Truly the Cruelest Cut of All?Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29 (09 1994), 459480.Google Scholar
DeAngelo, H.; DeAngelo, L.; and Skinner, D. J.. “Accounting Choice in Troubled Companies.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17 (01 1994), 113143.Google Scholar
Denis, D. J.; Denis, D. K.; and Sarin, A.. “The Information Content of Dividend Changes: Cash Flow Signaling, Overinvestment, and Dividends Clienteles.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29 (12 1994), 567587.Google Scholar
Desai, H., and Jain, P. C.. “Dividend Signaling and Common Stock Returns following Stock Splits and Reverse Splits.” Unpubl. Manuscript, Tulane Univ. (1995).Google Scholar
Doran, D. T.Stock Dividend Events: Empirical Support for the Retained Earnings Hypothesis.” Advances in Accounting, 8 (1990), 323.Google Scholar
Fama, E.; Fisher, L.; Jensen, M.; and Roll, R.. “The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information.” International Economic Review, 10 (02 1969), 121.Google Scholar
Grinblatt, M. S.; Masulis, R. W.; and Titman, S.. “The Valuation Effects of Stock Splits and Stock Dividends.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (12 1984), 461490.Google Scholar
Healy, P. M., and Palepu, K. G.. “Earnings Information Conveyed by Dividend Initiations and Omissions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 21 (09 1988), 149175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, P. M., and Palepu, K. G.. “Effectiveness of Accounting-Based Dividend Covenants.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12 (01 1990), 97123.Google Scholar
Healy, P. M., and Palepu, K. G.. “The Effects of Firms' Financial Disclosure Strategies on Stock Prices.” Accounting Horizons, 7 (03 1993), 111.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, D. L.; Rankine, G.; and Stice, E. K.. “What Do Stock Splits Really Signal?Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (09 1996), 357375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalay, A.Stockholder-Bondholder Conflict and Dividend Constraints”. Journal of Financial Economics, 10 (07 1982), 211233.Google Scholar
Lakonishok, J., and Lev, B.. “Stock Splits and Stock Dividends: Why, Who, and When”. Journal of Finance, 42 (09 1987), 913932.Google Scholar
McGough, P.The Legal Significance of the Par Value of Common Stock: What Accounting Educators Should Know”. Issues in Accounting Education, 3 (Fall 1988), 330350.Google Scholar
McNichols, M., and Dravid, A.. “Stock Dividends, Stock Splits, and Signaling”. Journal of Finance, 45 (07 1990), 857879.Google Scholar
Peterson, C.; Millar, J.; and Rimbey, J.. “The Economic Consequences of Accounting for Stock Splits and Large Stock Dividends”. Accounting Review, 71 (04 1996), 241253.Google Scholar
Rankine, G., and Stice, E. K.. “Accounting Rules and the Signaling Properties of 20% Stock Dividends”. Accounting Review, 72 (01 1997), 2346.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. L.; Samson, W. D.; and Dugan, M. T.. “The Stockholders' Equity Section: Form without Substance?Accounting Horizons, 4 (12 1990), 3546.Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Pro Rata Stock Distributions to Shareholders, ASR 124, Washington, SEC Accounting Rules (1972).Google Scholar
Smith, C. W., and Warner, J. B.. “On Financial Contracting: An Analysis of Bond Covenants”. Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (06 1979), 117161.Google Scholar
Woolridge, J. R.Stock Dividends as Signals”. Journal of Financial Research, 6 (Spring 1983), 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeff, Stephen A. “Towards a Fundamental Rethinking of the Role of the ‘Intermediate’ Course in the Accounting Curriculum”. In The Impact of Rule-Making on Intermediate Financial Accounting Textbooks, Jensen, Daniel L., ed. Columbus, OH (1982).Google Scholar
Zucca, L. J., and Kirch, D. P.. “A Gap in GAAP: Accounting for Midrange Stock Distributions”. Accounting Horizons, 10 (06 1996), 100112.Google Scholar