Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:02:59.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Managerial Entrenchment and Payout Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Aidong Hu
Affiliation:
[email protected], School of Business and Economics, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Praveen Kumar
Affiliation:
[email protected], Department of Finance, C. T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204

Abstract

Building on the managerial entrenchment literature, we develop and test a novel perspectiveon payout policy that integrates the influence of internal governance mechanisms, investment opportunities, management compensation, and monitoring by large shareholders. Our study incorporates both dividend payments and share repurchases, and examines the determinants of the likelihood and the level of payouts. Our model performs well in both in-sample and out-of-sample predictions on a sample of 2,081 firms during 1992–2000. We find that both the likelihood and the level of payouts are significantly and positively (negatively) related to factors that increase (decrease) executive entrenchment levels, even when controlling for size, leverage, and the proportion of tangible to total assets. We identify factors that significantly affect the likelihood but not the level of payouts (or vice versa), and show that entrenchment has an asymmetric influence on dividend vs. shares repurchase policy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, F.; Bernardo, A.; and Welch, I.. “A Theory of Dividends Based on Tax Clienteles.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 24992536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, F., and Michaely, R.. “Dividend Policy.” In Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. IX, Jarrow, R. et al. , eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier-Science (1995).Google Scholar
Allen, F., and Michaely, R.. “Payout Policy.” Working Paper, Univ. of Pennsylvania (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audretsch, D.Innovation, Growth and Survival.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13 (1995), 441456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baber, W.; Janakiraman, S.; and Kang, S.. “Investment Opportunities and the Structure of Performance Based Executive Compensation.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21 (1996), 297318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, M.; Kasznick, R.; and McNichols, M.. “Analyst Coverage and Intangible Assets.” Working Paper, Stanford Univ. (2001).Google Scholar
Berger, P.; Ofek, E.; and Yermack, D.. “Managerial Entrenchment and Capital Structure Decisions.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 14111438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, B.Board Control and CEO Compensation.” Strategic Management Journal, 15 (1994), 335344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M., and Thakor, A.. “Shareholder Preferences and Dividend Policy.” Journal of Finance, 45 (1990), 9931018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickley, J.; Coles, J.; and Terry, R.. “The Board of Directors and the Enactment of Poison Pills.” Journal of Financial Economics, 35 (1994), 371390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Core, J.; Holthausen, R.; and Larcker, D.. “Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 51 (1999), 371406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R.; Kang, S.; and Kumar, P.. “Corporate Governance, Takeovers, and Top-Management Compensation: Theory and Evidence.” Management Science, 48 (2002), 453469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dann, L.; Masulis, R.; and Mayer, D.. “Repurchase Tender Offers and Earnings Information.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14 (1991), 217251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, D.; Denis, D.; and Sarin, A.. “Agency Problems, Equity Ownership, and Corporate Diversification.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 135160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.. “The Cross-section of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 131156.Google Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.. “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?Journal of Financial Economics, 60 (2001), 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and Jensen, M.. “Separation of Ownership and Control.” Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (1983), 301325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenn, G., and Liang, N.. “Corporate Payout Policy and Managerial Incentives.” Journal of Financial Economics, 60 (2001), 4572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, S., and Hambrick, D.. “Chief Executive Compensation: A Study of the Intersection of Markets and Political Processes.” Strategic Management Journal, 10 (1989), 121134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fluck, Z.The Dynamics of the Management-Shareholder Conflict.” Review of Financial Studies, 12 (1999), 379404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaver, J., and Gaver, K.. “Additional Evidence on the Association between Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16 (1993), 125160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grullon, G., and Michaely, R.. “Dividends, Share Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 16491684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B., and Liebman, J.. “Are CEOs Paid Like Bureaucrats?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103 (1998), 664691.Google Scholar
Hermalin, B., and Weisbach, M.. “The Effects of Board Compositions and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance.” Financial Management, 20 (1991), 101112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagannathan, M.; Stephens, C.; and Weisbach, M.. “Financial Flexibility and Choice between Dividends and Share Repurchases.” Journal of Financial Economics, 57 (2000), 355384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, G.; Solberg, S.; and Zorn, T.. “Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27 (1992), 247263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M.Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers.” American Economic Review, 76 (1986), 323329.Google Scholar
Jensen, M.. “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and Failure of Internal Control Systems.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 3544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M., and Meckling, W.. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), 305360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M., and Murphy, K.. “Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives.” Journal of Political Economy, 98 (1990), 225264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, K.; Kim, Y.; and Stulz, R.. “Timing, Investment Opportunities, Managerial Discretion, and the Security Issue Decision.” Journal of Financial Economics, 42 (1996), 159185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, P., and Lee, B. S.. “Discrete Dividend Policy with Permanent Earnings.” Financial Management, 30 (2001), 5576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, R.; Lanen, W.; and Larcker, D.. “Executive Stock Option Plans and Corporate Dividend Policy.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24 (1989), 409425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewellen, W.; Loderer, C.; and Martin, K.. “Executive Compensation and Executive Incentive Problems.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 9 (1987), 287310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lintner, J.Distribution of Incomes of Corporations among Dividends, Retained Earnings and Taxes.” American Economic Review, 46 (1956), 97113.Google Scholar
Mace, M.Directors: Myth and Reality. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press (1986).Google Scholar
McDonald, R.Derivatives Market. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley (2003).Google Scholar
Miller, M.Debt and Taxes.Journal of Finance, 32 (1977), 261275.Google Scholar
Murphy, K.Incentives, Learning, and Compensation: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of Managerial Labor Contracts.” Rand Journal of Economics, 7 (1986), 5976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S.Determinants of Corporate Borrowing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (1977), 147176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaes, W., and Zingales, L.. “Capital Structure Choice when Managers Are in Control: Entrenchment versus Efficiency.” Working Paper W5384, National Bureau of Economic Research (1996).Google Scholar
Rosenstein, S., and Wyatt, J.. “Outside Directors, Board Independence, and Shareholder Wealth.” Journal of Financial Economics, 26 (1990), 175191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.. “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control.” Journal of Political Economy, 94 (1986), 461488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.. “Management Entrenchment: the Case of Manager-Specific Investments.” Journal of Financial Economics, 25 (1989), 123139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C., and Watts, R.. “The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 32 (1992), 263292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stulz, R.Managerial Control of Voting Rights: Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 2554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stulz, R.Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financing Policies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 26 (1990), 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermalaen, T.Common Stock Repurchases and Market Signaling.” Journal of Financial Economics, 9 (1981), 138183.Google Scholar
Weisbenner, S.Corporate Share Repurchases in Mid-1990s: What Role Do Stock Options Play.” Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2000).Google Scholar
White, L.Executive Compensation and Dividend Policy.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 2 (1996), 335358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yermack, D.Higher Market Valuation for Firms with Small Board of Directors.” Journal of Financial Economics, 32 (1996), 263292.Google Scholar
Zhou, X.Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link between Ownership and Performance: Comment.” Journal of Financial Economics, 62 (2001), 559571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwiebel, J.Dynamic Capital Structure under Managerial Entrenchment.” American Economic Review, 86 (1996), 11971215.Google Scholar