Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 August 2022
We present a dynamic, continuous-time model in which risk averse inside equityholders set a bank’s lending, payout, and financing policies, and the exposure of bank assets to crashes. We examine whether bailouts encourage excessive lending and risk taking compared to liquidation or bail-ins with debt-to-equity conversion or debt write-downs. The effects of the prevailing insolvency resolution mechanism (IRM) on the probability of insolvency, loss in default, and the bank’s value suggest no single IRM is a panacea. We show how a bailout fund financed through a tax on bank dividends resolves bailouts without public money and without distorting insiders’ incentives.
We thank Mark Flannery, Jarrad Harford (the editor), Erwan Morellec (the referee), our discussants (Simon Gleeson, Robert Marquez, John Nash), seminar participants at the Toulouse School of Economics, Bangor University, University of Bath, University of Exeter, and participants at the 2018 BAFA Corporate Finance and Asset Pricing Symposium, the 2019 CERF Cavalcade, the International Finance Symposium, the 2018 SFS Cavalcade Asia-Pacific, the 2018 Rome International Conference on Money, Banking and Finance, the 2019 WFA meetings, and CERF in the City for helpful comments and discussions. Financial support from the JM Keynes Fellowship for Lambrecht and from the Cambridge Endowment for Research in Finance (CERF) for both authors is gratefully acknowledged.