Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:17:39.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integer Programming in Capital Budgeting: A Note on Computational Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Richard H. Pettway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Solving capital budgeting problems with linear and integer programming has been part of the finance literature for some time [21, 22, 23, 7, 14, and 18]. Capital budgeting problems have unique properties that distinguish them from other integer linear problems discussed in the mathematical programming literature. Capital budgeting problems generally have the following characteristics: (1) the matrix tends to be rectangular with more variables than constraints; (2) they are all maximization problems with ≤ constraints and nonnegativity conditions in the general form 0≤xi≤1 in the case of linear programming and xi = 0, 1 in the case of integer problems; and (3) there are often mutually exclusive projects among the variables. The purposes of this note are to illustrate some computational experience using existing integer algorithms to solve a set of capital budgeting problems and to begin to catalog the performance of integer codes on financial problems.

Type
Communications
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , September 1973 , pp. 665 - 672
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Balas, Egon. “An Additive Algorithm for Solving the Linear Programs with Zero-One Variables.” Operations Research, July–August 1965, pp. 517–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Cord, J. “A Method for Allocating Funds to Investment Projects When Returns are Subject to Uncertainty.” Management Science, June 1964, pp. 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Dyckman, T. R. “Allocating Funds to Investment Projects When Returns are Subject to Uncertainty: A Comment.” Management Science, November 1964, pp. 348–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Geoffrion, A. M.An Improved Implicit Enumeration Approach for Integer Programming. Memo. Rm - 5644 - PR. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, June 1968.Google Scholar
[5]Geoffrion, A. M. “An Improved Implicit Enumeration Approach for Integer Programming.” Operations Research, vol. 17, May–June 1969, pp. 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Geoffrion, A. M., and Marsten, R. E.. “Integer Programming Algorithms: A Framework and State-of-the-Art Survey.” Management Science, vol. 18, May 1972, pp. 465–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Glover, Fred. “The Knapsack Problem: Some Relations for an Improved Algorithm.” Management Science Research Report No. 38. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Carnegie Institute of Technology, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, January 1965.Google Scholar
[8]Glover, Fred. “A Multiphase - Dual Algorithm for the Zero-One Integer Programming Problem.” Operations Research, November–December 1965, pp. 879–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Gue, Ronald L.; Liggett, John C.; and Cain, Kenneth C.. “Analysis of Algorithms for Zero-One Programming Problems.” Communications of the ACM, vol. 11, December 1968, pp. 837–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Ignizio, James P. “On the Establishment of Standards for Comparing Algorithm Performance.” Interfaces, vol. 2, 1971, pp. 8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Lawler, E. L., and Bell, M. D.. “A Method for Solving Discrete Optimization Problems.” Operations Research, November–December 1966, pp. 1098–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Lemke, C. E., and Spielberg, K.. “Direct Search Algorithms for Zero-One and Mixed-Integer Programming.” Operations Research, September–October 1967, pp. 892–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Lorie, J. H., and Savage, L. J.. “Three Problems in Rationing Capital.” Journal of Business, October 1955, pp. 141–152.Google Scholar
[14]Mao, James C. T.Quantitative Analysis of Financial Decisions. London: The Macmillan Company, 1969.Google Scholar
[15]Operations Research, Issue No. 4. Minneapolis, Minn.: Control Data Corporation, December 1968.Google Scholar
[16]Petersen, C. C. “Computational Experience with Variants of the Balas Algorithm Applied to the Selection of R & D Projects.” Management Science, May 1967, pp. 736–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Plane, Donald R., and McMillan, Claude Jr.Discrete Optimization. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
[18]Quirin, G. David. The Capital Expenditure Decision. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1967, pp. 175–197.Google Scholar
[19]Trauth, C. A. Jr., and Woolsey, R. E.. “Integer Linear Programming: A Study in Computational Efficiency.” Management Science, vol. 15, May 1969, pp. 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Wagner, Harvey M.Principles of Operations Research. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1969, pp. 459–466.Google Scholar
[21]Weingartner, H. Martin.Mathematical Programming and The Analysis of Capital Budgeting Problems. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1963.Google Scholar
[22]Weingartner, H. Martin. “Capital Budgeting of Interrelated Projects: Survey and Synthesis.” Management Science, vol. 12, March 1966, pp. 485–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Weingartner, H. Martin. “Methods for the Solution of the Multi-dimensional O/l Knapsack Problem.” Operations Research, January–February 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Woolsey, Gene. “Comment on Briskin's Note.” Management Science, vol. 17, March 1971, pp. 500–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Woolsey, Gene. “On Telling It Like It Is in Integer Programming.” Institute of Operations Research Report No. 1, June 1970.Google Scholar
[26]Woolsey, Gene, and Trauth, C. A. Jr.IPSC, A Machine Independent Integer Linear Program. Sandia Laboratories Research Report SC-RR-66–433, July 1966.Google Scholar