Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:51:01.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of a Fuel Adjustment Clause on the Regulated Firm's Value and Cost of Capital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Roger G. Clarke
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years the cost of fuel to operate power plants for electric utilities has increased much faster than many utility executives and regulators have anticipated. In the presence of substantial regulatory lag in adjusting rates, stockholders have had to absorb the difference between revenues and unanticipated increases in fuel expenses. In an effort to shorten the time required for increased costs to be reflected in increased prices to consumers, many firms have been allowed to use an automatic fuel adjustment clause (FAC) to pass on increased costs to consumers as they occur. The FAC usually allows the firm to adjust the price of electricity when the price of fuel deviates from some fixed base price. Presently more than 40 of the 50 state regulatory commissions allow some type of FAC.

Type
VI. Trefftzs' Award
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , November 1978 , pp. 745 - 757
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Carver, John A. “Developments in Regulation: Adjustment Clauses” Denver Law Journal, Vol. 53, No. 4 (1976).Google Scholar
[2]Clarke, Roger G. “Automatic Revenue Adjustment Clauses and the Regulated Firm.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business (1978).Google Scholar
[3]Croft, James A. “Due Process Restraints on the Use of Automatic Adjustment Clauses in Utility Rate Schedules.” Arizona Law Review, Vol. 18, No. 2 (1976).Google Scholar
[4]“Due Process and the Automatic Fuel Adjustment Clause.” Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 52 (Spring 1977), pp. 637–50.Google Scholar
[5]Grauer, F., and Litzenberger, R.. “The Pricing of Commodity Futures Contracts, Nominal Bonds and Other Risky Assets under Commodity Price Uncertainty.” Research Paper No. 220, Stanford University (Revised 03 1978).Google Scholar
[6]Jensen, M. C. “Capital Markets: Theory and Evidence.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science (Autumn 1972), pp. 357–398.Google Scholar
[7]Martin, Sidney. “The Fuel Adjustment Clause and Its Role in the Regulatory Process.” Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 47 (1976).Google Scholar
[8]National Electric Rate Book, Federal Power Commission, 1976–1977 ed. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
[9]Rothchild, M., and Stiglitz, J.. “Increasing Risk: A Definition.” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 2 (1970), pp. 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Sarikas, Robert H. “What Is New in Adjustment Clauses.” Public Utilities Fortnightly, Vol. 95 (06 19, 1975), pp. 32–36.Google Scholar
[11]Schiffel, Dennis. “Electric Utility Regulation: An Overview of Fuel Adjustment Clauses.” Public Utilities Fortnightly, Vol. 95 (06 19, 1975), pp. 23–31Google Scholar
[12]Sharpe, W. F.Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. New York: McGraw-Hill (1970).Google Scholar
[13]Trigg, R. S. “Escalator Clauses in Public Utility Rate Schedules.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar