Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T11:06:14.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Generalization of the CAPM Based on a Property of the Covariance Operator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Etienne Losq  and
John Peter D. Chateau
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A key assumption behind the traditional capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is the joint normality of security returns. Recently, however, this assumption has been relaxed in at least two directions. First, the emergence of continuous-time models has shifted emphasis from discrete-time random variables to continuous-time diffusion processes, with log-normality (as opposed to normality) for security prices in the stationary case. Second, the recognition that the CAPM is difficult to test empirically has led to the development of an asset pricing theory based on an arbitrage argument in large markets and free of any distributional assumption.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 17 , Issue 5 , December 1982 , pp. 783 - 797
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Chen, A. “Effects of Purchasing Power Risk on Portfolio Demand for Money.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 14, No. 2 (1979), pp. 243–254.Google Scholar
[2]Chen, A., and Boness, J.. “Effect of Uncertain Inflation on the Investment and Financing Decision of the Firm.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 30, No. 2 (1975), pp. 469–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Feller, W.An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, 3rd ed.New York: John A. Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1968).Google Scholar
[4]Friend, I.; Landskroner, Y.; and Losq, E.. “The Demand for Risky Assets under Uncertain Inflation.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 31, No. 5 (1976), pp. 1287–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Grauer, F., and Litzenberger, R.. “The Pricing of Commodity Futures Contracts, Nominal Bonds and other Risky Assets under Commodity Price Uncertainty.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 34, No. 1 (1979), pp. 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Grauer, F.; Litzenberger, R.; and Stehle, R.. “Sharing Rules and Equilibrium in an International Capital Market under Uncertainty.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3 (1976), pp. 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Heckerman, D. “Portfolio Selection and the Structure of Capital Asset Prices When Relative Prices of Consumption Goods May Change.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 27, No. 1 (1972), pp. 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Long, J. “Stock Prices, Inflation and the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 1 (1974), pp. 131–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Manaster, S. “Real and Nominal Efficient Sets.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 34, No. 1 (1979), PP. 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Ross, S. “The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing.” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 13 (1976), pp. 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Ross, S. “The Current Status of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM).” Journal of Finance, Vol. 33, No. 3 (1978), pp. 885–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Rubinstein, M. “A Comparative Statics Analysis of Risk Premiums.” Journal of Business, Vol. 4 (1973), pp. 604–615.Google Scholar
[13]Rubinstein, M. “The Valuation of Uncertain Income Streams and the Pricing of Options.” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 7 (1976), pp. 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Siegel, J. “The Role of Price Level Uncertainty in Determining the Opportunity Cost of Holding Money.” Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research, Working Paper No. 8–79 (1979).Google Scholar
[15]Siegel, J., and Warner, J.. “Indexation, the Risk-Free Asset, and Capital Market Equilibrium.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 32, No. 4 (1971), PP. 1101–1107.Google Scholar