Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:33:47.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gambling and Comovement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Alok Kumar ,
Jeremy K. Page  and
Oliver G. Spalt
Alok Kumar*
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of Miami, School of Business Administration, Coral Gables, FL 33124
Jeremy K. Page
Affiliation:
[email protected], Brigham Young University, Marriott School of Management, Provo, UT 84602
Oliver G. Spalt
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management, Tilburg 5000 LE, Netherlands.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study shows that correlated trading by gambling-motivated investors generates excess return comovement among stocks with lottery features. Lottery-like stocks comove strongly with one another, and this return comovement is strongest among lottery stocks located in regions where investors exhibit stronger gambling propensity. Looking directly at investor trades, we find that investors with a greater propensity to gamble trade lottery-like stocks more actively and that those trades are more strongly correlated. Finally, we demonstrate that time variation in general gambling enthusiasm and income shocks from fluctuating economic conditions induce a systematic component in investors’ demand for lottery-like stocks.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 85 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2016 

References

Alesina, A., and La Ferrara, E.. “Participation in Heterogeneous Communities.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (2000), 847–904.Google Scholar
Amihud, Y. “Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects.” Journal of Financial Markets, 5 (2002), 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B. M., and Odean, T.. “Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 773–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B. M.; Odean, T.; and Zhu, N.. “Do Noise Traders Move Markets?” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 151–186.Google Scholar
Barberis, N.; Shleifer, A.; and Wurgler, J.. “Comovement.” Journal of Financial Economics, 75 (2005), 283–317.Google Scholar
Becker, B.; Ivković, Z.; and Weisbenner, S.. “Local Dividend Clienteles.” Journal of Finance, 66 (2011), 655–683.Google Scholar
Blalock, G.; Just, D. R.; and Simon, D. H.. “Hitting the Jackpot or Hitting the Skids: Entertainment, Poverty, and the Demand for State Lotteries.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 66 (2007), 545–570.Google Scholar
Boyer, B. “Style-Related Comovement: Fundamentals or Labels?” Journal of Finance, 66 (2011), 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carhart, M. M. “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 57–82.Google Scholar
Coelho, L.; John, K.; and Taffler, R. J.. “Bankrupt Firms: Who’s Buying?” Working Paper, University of Warwick (2010).Google Scholar
Coval, J. D., and Moskowitz, T. J.. “Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Preference in Domestic Portfolios.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 2045–2073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, J. S.; Jiang, D.; and Peterson, D. R.. “Gambling Preference and the New Year Effect of Assets with Lottery Features.” Review of Finance, 16 (2011), 685–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorn, D., and Sengmueller, P.. “Trading as Entertainment.” Management Science, 55 (2009), 591–603.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Industry Costs of Capital.” Journal of Financial Economics, 43 (1997), 153–193.Google Scholar
Froot, K. A., and Dabora, E. M.. “How Are Stock Prices Affected by the Location of Trade?” Journal of Financial Economics, 53 (1999), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, X., and Lin, T.-C.. “Do Individual Investors Trade Stocks as Gambling? Evidence from Repeated Natural Experiments.” Working Paper, University of Hong Kong (2011).Google Scholar
Grinblatt, M., and Keloharju, M.. “Sensation Seeking, Overconfidence, and Trading Activity.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 549–578.Google Scholar
Hilary, G., and Hui, K. W.. “Does Religion Matter in Corporate Decision Making in America?” Journal of Financial Economics, 93 (2009), 455–473.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, A., and Shefrin, H.. “Online Investors: What They Want, What They Do, and How Their Portfolios Perform.” Working Paper, Santa Clara University (2011).Google Scholar
Huberman, G. “Familiarity Breeds Investment.” Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2001), 659–680.Google Scholar
Hvidkjaer, S. “Small Trades and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns.” Review of Financial Studies, 21 (2008), 1123–1151.Google Scholar
Ivković, Z., and Weisbenner, S.. “Local Does as Local Is: Information Content of the Geography of Individual Investors’ Common Stock Investments.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 267–306.Google Scholar
Korniotis, G. M., and Kumar, A.. “Do Behavioral Biases Adversely Affect the Macro-Economy?” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2011), 1513–1559.Google Scholar
Korniotis, G. M., and Kumar, A.. “State-Level Business Cycles and Local Return Predictability.” Journal of Finance, 68 (2013), 1037–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A. “Hard-to-Value Stocks, Behavioral Biases, and Informed Trading.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44 (2009a), 1375–1401.Google Scholar
Kumar, A. “Who Gambles in the Stock Market?” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009b), 1889–1933.Google Scholar
Kumar, A., and Lee, C. M. C.. “Retail Investor Sentiment and Return Comovements.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 2451–2486.Google Scholar
Kumar, A.; Page, J.; and Spalt, O.. “Religious Beliefs, Gambling Attitudes, and Financial Market Outcomes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 102 (2011), 671–708.Google Scholar
Lee, C. M. C.; Shleifer, A.; and Thaler, R. H.. “Investor Sentiment and the Closed-End Fund Puzzle.” Journal of Finance, 46 (1991), 75–109.Google Scholar
Lustig, H., and van Nieuwerburgh, S.. “Housing Collateral, Consumption Insurance, and Risk Premia: An Empirical Perspective.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 1167–1219.Google Scholar
Lustig, H., and van Nieuwerburgh, S.. “How Much Does Household Collateral Constrain Regional Risk Sharing?” Review of Economic Dynamics, 13 (2010), 265–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajan, R. G., and Zingales, L.. “Financial Dependence and Growth.” American Economic Review, 88 (1998), 559–586.Google Scholar
Schneider, C., and Spalt, O. G.. “Conglomerate Investment, Skewness, and the CEO Long-Shot Bias.” Journal of Finance, forthcoming (2016).Google Scholar
Shu, T.; Sulaeman, J.; and Yeung, P. E.. “Local Religious Beliefs and Mutual Fund Risk-Taking Behaviors.” Management Science, 58 (2012), 1779–1796.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Kumar supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Kumar supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 75.4 KB