Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:21:13.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fintech Lending and Credit Market Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2023

Yinxiao Chu  and
Jianxing Wei Open the ORCID record for Jianxing Wei [Opens in a new window]
Yinxiao Chu
Affiliation:
University of International Business and Economics School of Banking and Finance [email protected]
Jianxing Wei*
Affiliation:
University of International Business and Economics School of Banking and Finance
*
[email protected] (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article studies how the rise of financial technology (Fintech) lending affects credit access, interest rates, and social welfare. We consider a lending competition model with two incumbent banks and a Fintech lender, which use different information and technologies to assess borrower creditworthiness. We show that Fintech lending could negatively affect high-quality borrowers’ access to credit when the Fintech lender’s screening accuracy is superior to that of the banks. Furthermore, Fintech lending may worsen the allocative efficiency of credit and reduce social welfare under some conditions. Analytical and numerical results suggest that Fintech lending mostly reduces the expected interest rates.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 59 , Issue 5 , August 2024 , pp. 2199 - 2225
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Footnotes

We thank an anonymous referee and Thierry Foucault (the editor) for their helpful comments and suggestions that improved this article substantially. We are grateful to Zhao Li, Kebin Ma, and Zhen Zhou for valuable comments and suggestions. Wei’s research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 72003030). Any remaining errors are our own.

References

Agarwal, S.; Alok, S.; Ghosh, P.; and Gupta, S.. “Financial Inclusion and Alternate Credit Scoring for the Millennials: Role of Big Data and Machine Learning in Fintech.” Working Paper, National University of Singapore (2020).Google Scholar
Agarwal, S., and Hauswald, R.. “Distance and Private Information in Lending.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 2757–2788.10.1093/rfs/hhq001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almazan, A. “A Model of Competition in Banking: Bank Capital vs Expertise.” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 11 (2002), 87–121.10.1006/jfin.2001.0327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balyuk, T.; Berger, A. N.; and Hackney, J.. “What is Fueling FinTech Lending? The Role of Banking Market Structure.” Working Paper, Emory University (2020).10.2139/ssrn.3633907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, P. “Common Value Auctions with Asymmetric Bidder Information.” Economics Letters, 88 (2005a), 47–53.10.1016/j.econlet.2004.07.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, P. “Information Acquisition Under Uncertainty in Credit Markets.” Review of Financial Studies, 18 (2005b), 1075–1104.10.1093/rfs/hhi024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, T.; Burg, V.; Gombović, A.; and Puri, M.. “On the Rise of Fintechs: Credit Scoring Using Digital Footprints.” Review of Financial Studies, 33 (2020), 2845–2897.10.1093/rfs/hhz099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, T.; Fuster, A.; and Puri, M.. “FinTech Lending.” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14 (2022), 187–207.10.1146/annurev-financial-101521-112042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, A. N.; Miller, N. H.; Petersen, M. A.; Rajan, R. G.; and Stein, J. C.. “Does Function Follow Organizational Form? Evidence from the Lending Practices of Large and Small Banks.” Journal of Financial Economics, 76 (2005), 237–269.10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, A. N., and Udell, G. F.. “Small Business Credit Availability and Relationship Lending: The Importance of Bank Organisational Structure.” Economic Journal, 112 (2002), F32–F53.10.1111/1468-0297.00682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boot, A.; Hoffmann, P.; Laeven, L.; and Ratnovski, L.. “Fintech: What’s Old, What’s New?” Journal of Financial Stability, 53 (2021), 100836.10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broecker, T. “Credit-Worthiness Tests and Interbank Competition.” Econometrica, 58 (1990), 429–452.10.2307/2938210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchak, G.; Matvos, G.; Piskorski, T.; and Seru, A.. “Fintech, Regulatory Arbitrage, and the Rise of Shadow Banks.” Journal of Financial Economics, 130 (2018), 453–483.10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.03.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claessens, S.; Frost, J.; Turner, G.; and Zhu, F.. “Fintech Credit Markets Around the World: Size, Drivers and Policy Issues.” BIS Quarterly Review, September (2018), 29–49.Google Scholar
Cornaggia, J.; Wolfe, B.; and Yoo, W.. “Crowding Out Banks: Credit Substitution by Peer-to-Peer Lending.” Working Paper, Pennsylvania State University (2019).Google Scholar
Cornelli, G.; Frost, J.; Gambacorta, L.; Rau, P. R.; Wardrop, R.; and Ziegler, T.. “Fintech and Big Tech Credit: A New Database.” Working Paper, BIS (2020).Google Scholar
De Roure, C.; Pelizzon, L.; and Thakor, A.. “P2P Lenders Versus Banks: Cream Skimming or Bottom Fishing?” Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 11 (2022), 213–262.10.1093/rcfs/cfab026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degryse, H., and Ongena, S.. “Distance, Lending Relationships, and Competition.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 231–266.10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00729.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell’Ariccia, G.; Friedman, E.; and Marquez, R.. “Adverse Selection as a Barrier to Entry in the Banking Industry.” RAND Journal of Economics, 30 (1999) 515–534.10.2307/2556061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Maggio, M.; Ratnadiwakara, D.; and Carmichael, D.. “Invisible Primes: Fintech Lending with Alternative Data.” NBER Working Paper No. 29840 (2022).10.3386/w29840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Maggio, M., and Yao, V.. “Fintech Borrowers: Lax Screening or Cream-Skimming?” Review of Financial Studies, 34 (2021), 4565–4618.10.1093/rfs/hhaa142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R.; Milgrom, P. R.; and Weber, R. J.. “Competitive Bidding and Proprietary Information.” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 11 (1983), 161–169.10.1016/0304-4068(83)90034-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, J.; Gambacorta, L.; Huang, Y.; Shin, H. S.; and Zbinden, P.. “BigTech and the Changing Structure of Financial Intermediation.” Economic Policy, 34 (2019), 761–799.10.1093/epolic/eiaa003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuster, A.; Plosser, M.; Schnabl, P.; and Vickery, J.. “The Role of Technology in Mortgage Lending.” Review of Financial Studies, 32 (2019), 1854–1899.10.1093/rfs/hhz018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambacorta, L.; Huang, Y.; Qiu, H.; and Wang, J.. “How Do Machine Learning and Non-Traditional Data Affect Credit Scoring? New Evidence from a Chinese Fintech Firm.” BIS Working Paper (2019).Google Scholar
Gopal, M., and Schnabl, P.. “The Rise of Finance Companies and FinTech Lenders in Small Business Lending.” Review of Financial Studies, 35 (2022), 4859–4901.10.1093/rfs/hhac034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granja, J.; Leuz, C.; and Rajan, R. G.. “Going the Extra Mile: Distant Lending and Credit Cycles.” Journal of Finance, 77 (2022), 1259–1324.10.1111/jofi.13114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hau, H.; Huang, Y.; Shan, H.; and Sheng, Z.. “How FinTech Enters China’s Credit Market.” AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109 (2019), 60–64.10.1257/pandp.20191012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hau, H.; Huang, Y.; Shan, H.; and Sheng, Z.. “FinTech Credit and Entrepreneurial Growth.” Working Paper, Swiss Finance Institute (2021).10.2139/ssrn.3899863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausch, D. B. “An Asymmetric Common-Value Auction Model.” RAND Journal of Economics, 18 (1987), 611–621.10.2307/2555645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauswald, R., and Marquez, R.. “Information Technology and Financial Services Competition.” Review of Financial Studies, 16 (2003), 921–948.10.1093/rfs/hhg017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauswald, R., and Marquez, R.. “Competition and Strategic Information Acquisition in Credit Markets.” Review of Financial Studies, 19 (2006), 967–1000.10.1093/rfs/hhj021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Z.; Huang, J.; and Zhou, J.. “Open Banking: Credit Market Competition When Borrowers Own the Data.” Journal of Financial Economics, 147 (2023), 449–474.10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Qiu, H.; Sun, T.; Wang, X.; and Berger, H.. “Fintech Credit Risk Assessment for SMEs: Evidence from China.” IMF Working Paper (2020).10.5089/9781513557618.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyer, R.; Khwaja, A. I.; Luttmer, E. F.; and Shue, K.. “Screening Peers Softly: Inferring the Quality of Small Borrowers.” Management Science, 62 (2016), 1554–1577.10.1287/mnsc.2015.2181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagtiani, J., and Lemieux, C.. “The Roles of Alternative Data and Machine Learning in Fintech Lending: Evidence from the Lendingclub Consumer Platform.” Financial Management, 48 (2019), 1009–1029.10.1111/fima.12295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagel, J. H., and Levin, D.. “Common Value Auctions with Insider Information.” Econometrica, 67 (1999), 1219–1238.10.1111/1468-0262.00074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberti, J. M., and Petersen, M. A.. “Information: Hard and Soft.” Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 8 (2019), 1–41.10.1093/rcfs/cfy009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M.; Prabhala, N. R.; and Viswanathan, S.. “Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending.” Management Science, 59 (2013), 17–35.10.1287/mnsc.1120.1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P., and Weber, R. J.. “The Value of Information in a Sealed-Bid Auction.” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 10 (1982), 105–114.10.1016/0304-4068(82)90008-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parlour, C. A.; Rajan, U.; and Zhu, H.. “When FinTech Competes for Payment Flows.” Review of Financial Studies, 35 (2022), 4985–5024.10.1093/rfs/hhac022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, M. A., and Rajan, R. G.. “The Effect of Credit Market Competition on Lending Relationships.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (1995), 407–443.10.2307/2118445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, M. A., and Rajan, R. G.. “Does Distance Still Matter? The Information Revolution in Small Business Lending.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 2533–2570.10.1111/1540-6261.00505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippon, T. “On Fintech and Financial Inclusion.” BIS Working Paper (2020).10.3386/w26330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajan, R. G. “Insiders and Outsiders: The Choice Between Informed and Arm’s-Length Debt.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 1367–1400.Google Scholar
Riordan, M. H. “Competition and Bank Performance: A Theoretical Perspective.” In Capital Markets and Financial Intermediation, Mayer, C. and Vives, X., eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (1993), 328–343.10.1017/CBO9780511752056.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salop, S. C. “Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods.” Bell Journal of Economics, 10 (1979), 141–156.10.2307/3003323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, S. A. “Asymmetric Information, Bank Lending, and Implicit Contracts: A Stylized Model of Customer Relationships.” Journal of Finance, 45 (1990), 1069–1087.Google Scholar
Tang, H. “Peer-to-Peer Lenders Versus Banks: Substitutes or Complements?” Review of Financial Studies, 32 (2019), 1900–1938.10.1093/rfs/hhy137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakor, A. V. “Fintech and Banking: What Do We Know?” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 41 (2020), 100833.10.1016/j.jfi.2019.100833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vives, X. “Digital Disruption in Banking.” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 11 (2019), 243–272.10.1146/annurev-financial-100719-120854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vives, X., and Ye, Z.. “Information Technology and Bank Competition.” Working Paper, CESifo (2021).10.2139/ssrn.3863988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Thadden, E.-L. “Asymmetric Information, Bank Lending and Implicit Contracts: The Winner’s Curse.” Finance Research Letters, 1 (2004), 11–23.10.1016/S1544-6123(03)00006-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Chu and Wei supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Chu and Wei supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 613 KB