Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T09:32:00.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ETFs, Creation and Redemption Processes, and Bond Liquidity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2024

John D. Finnerty*
Affiliation:
Fordham University Gabelli School of Business
Natalia Reisel
Affiliation:
Fordham University Gabelli School of Business [email protected]
Xun Zhong
Affiliation:
Fordham University Gabelli School of Business [email protected]
*
[email protected] (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We examine a link between bond exchange-traded fund (ETF) creation and redemption processes and the underlying bond market liquidity. Using daily creation and redemption data, we find that including a bond in a creation or redemption basket has a favorable impact on the bond’s liquidity for both high-yield and investment-grade markets. The improvement in liquidity persists during times of market stress with this impact being stronger for redemptions than creations. Our results suggest that ETF mispricing arbitrage explains the improvement in bond liquidity. However, we also find evidence that transaction costs and bond inventory management limit the ETF arbitrage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Footnotes

The authors thank Doug Blackburn, Steve Laipply, Ananth Madhavan, Josh Penzner, and Kumar Venkataraman for many valuable insights. We thank Christopher Reilly (the referee) and Jennifer Conrad (the editor) for their detailed helpful comments. We are responsible for any remaining errors.

References

Ben-David, I.; Franzoni, F.; and Moussawi, R.. “Do ETFs Increase Volatility?Journal of Finance, 73 (2018), 24712535.Google Scholar
Bessembinder, H.; Jacobsen, S.; Maxwell, W.; and Venkataraman, K.. “Capital Commitment and Illiquidity in Corporate Bonds.” Journal of Finance, 73 (2018), 16151661.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, A., and O’Hara, M.. “Can ETF’s Increase Market Fragility? Effect of Information Linkages in ETF Markets.” Working Paper, Cornell University (2018).Google Scholar
BlackRock. Global Business Intelligence (2023).Google Scholar
Cohen, S.; Laipply, S.; Madhavan, A.; and Mauro, J.. “The Primary Process for Fixed Income Exchange-Traded Funds Under Market Stress.” Journal of Fixed Income, 31 (2022), 115.Google Scholar
Dannhauser, C. D.The Impact of Innovation: Evidence from Corporate Bond Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs).” Journal of Financial Economics, 125 (2017), 537560.Google Scholar
Holden, C. W., and Nam, J.. “Market Accessibility, Bond ETFs and Liquidity.” Working Paper, Indiana University (2021).Google Scholar
Koont, N.; Ma, Y.; Pástor, L.; and Zeng, Y.. “Steering a Ship in Illiquid Waters: Active Management of Passive Funds.” Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania (2023).Google Scholar
Lettau, M., and Madhavan, A.. “Exchange-Traded Funds 101 for Economists.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32 (2018), 135154.Google Scholar
Madhavan, A. Exchange-Traded Funds and the New Dynamics of Investing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2016).Google Scholar
Marta, T. “Fixed Income ETFs, Bond Liquidity, and Stressed Markets.” Working Paper, Wilfrid Laurier University (2022).Google Scholar
Pan, K., and Zeng, Y.. “ETF Arbitrage Under Liquidity Mismatch.” Working Paper, Harvard University (2019).Google Scholar
Shim, J. J., and Todorov, K.. “ETFs, Illiquid Assets, and Fire Sales.” Working Paper, University of Notre Dame (2023).Google Scholar
Todorov, K.The Anatomy of Bond ETF Arbitrage.” BIS Quarterly Review, March (2021), 4153.Google Scholar