Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:46:55.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equilibrium Price Dynamics of Emission Permits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2018

Steffen Hitzemann  and
Marliese Uhrig-Homburg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents a stochastic equilibrium model for environmental markets that allows us to study the characteristic properties of emission permit prices induced by the design of today’s cap-and-trade systems. We characterize emission permits as highly nonlinear contingent claims on economy-wide emissions and reveal their hybrid nature between investment and consumption assets. Our model makes predictions about the dynamics and volatility structure of emission permit prices, the forward price curve, and the implications for option pricing in this market. Empirical evidence from existing emissions markets shows that the model explains the stylized facts of emission permit prices and related derivatives.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , August 2018 , pp. 1653 - 1678
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We thank Antje Berndt, René Carmona, Marc Chesney, Karl-Martin Ehrhart, Sang Baum Kang, Rüdiger Kiesel, Dominik Möst, Paulo Pereira, Christian Schlag, Philipp Schuster, Siegfried Trautmann, Michael Triskatis, Clemens Völkert, and Volker Vonhoff, as well as participants at the 2009 International Ruhr Energy Conference, the 2010 Campus for Finance Research Conference, the 2010 Industrial-Academic Forum on Commodities, Energy Markets, and Emission Trading at the Fields Institute (Toronto), the 2010 World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, the 2010 Energy Finance Conference, the 2011 Annual Conference of the Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, the 2011 Financial Management Association European Conference, the 2011 European Financial Management Association Annual Meetings, the 2011 International Congress on Industrial and Applied Mathematics, the 2011 Annual Meeting of the German Finance Association, the 2011 Financial Management Association Annual Meeting, the 2013 Annual Meeting of the German Academic Association for Business Research, the 2013 Applicable Semiparametrics Conference, and the Universities of Duisburg-Essen and Zurich for valuable discussions and helpful comments and suggestions. The article greatly benefited from comments by Hendrik Bessembinder (the editor) and Gurdip Bakshi and Bryan Routledge (associate editors and referees). Financial support by the Graduate School 895 “Information Management and Market Engineering” at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), is gratefully acknowledged. An earlier version of this article was circulated under the title “Understanding the Price Dynamics of Emission Permits: A Model for Multiple Trading Periods.”

References

Baker, S. D.; Hollifield, B.; and Osambela, E.. “Disagreement, Speculation, and Aggregate Investment.” Journal of Financial Economics, 119 (2016), 210–225.Google Scholar
Bakshi, G.; Cao, C.; and Chen, Z.. “Empirical Performance of Alternative Option Pricing Models.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 2003–2049.Google Scholar
Bansal, R.; Kiku, D.; and Ochoa, M.. “Price of Long-Run Temperature Shifts in Capital Markets.” NBER Working Paper No. 22529 (2017).Google Scholar
Black, F.“Studies of Stock Price Volatility Changes.” In Proceedings of the 1976 Meetings of the American Statistical Association (1976), 177–181.Google Scholar
Brennan, M. J.“The Supply of Storage.” American Economic Review, 48 (1958), 50–72.Google Scholar
Calel, R., and Dechezleprêtre, A.. “Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 98 (2016), 173–191.Google Scholar
Carmona, R.; Delarue, F.; Espinosa, G.-E.; and Touzi, N.. “Singular Forward–Backward Stochastic Differential Equations and Emissions Derivatives.” Annals of Applied Probability, 23 (2013), 1086–1128.Google Scholar
Carmona, R., and Fehr, M.. “The Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Price Formation for Allowances and CERs.” In Progress in Probability, Vol. 63, Seminar on Stochastic Analysis, Random Fields and Applications (2011), 341–383.Google Scholar
Carmona, R.; Fehr, M.; and Hinz, J.. “Optimal Stochastic Control and Carbon Price Formation.” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 48 (2009), 2168–2190.Google Scholar
Carmona, R.; Fehr, M.; Hinz, J.; and Porchet, A.. “Market Design for Emission Trading Schemes.” SIAM Review, 52 (2010), 403–452.Google Scholar
Carmona, R., and Hinz, J.. “Risk-Neutral Models for Emission Allowance Prices and Option Valuation.” Management Science, 57 (2011), 1453–1468.Google Scholar
Casassus, J., and Collin-Dufresne, P.. “Stochastic Convenience Yield Implied from Commodity Futures and Interest Rates.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 2283–2331.Google Scholar
Cetin, U., and Verschuere, M.. “Pricing and Hedging in Carbon Emissions Markets.” International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 12 (2009), 949–967.Google Scholar
Chesney, M., and Taschini, L.. “The Endogenous Price Dynamics of Emission Allowances and an Application to CO2 Option Pricing.” Applied Mathematical Finance, 19 (2012), 447–475.Google Scholar
Chevallier, J.“Modelling the Convenience Yield in Carbon Prices Using Daily and Realized Measures.” International Review of Applied Financial Issues and Economics, 1 (2009), 56–73.Google Scholar
Christie, A. A.“The Stochastic Behavior of Common Stock Variances: Value, Leverage and Interest Rate Effects.” Journal of Financial Economics, 10 (1982), 407–432.Google Scholar
Cline, W. R. Carbon Abatement Costs and Climate Change Finance. Washington DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics (2011).Google Scholar
Coase, R. H.“The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (1960), 1–44.Google Scholar
Cronshaw, M. B., and Kruse, J.. “Regulated Firms in Pollution Permit Markets with Banking.” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 9 (1996), 179–189.Google Scholar
Daskalakis, G.; Psychoyios, D.; and Markellos, R. N.. “Modeling CO2 Emission Allowance Prices and Derivatives: Evidence from the European Trading Scheme.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 33 (2009), 1230–1241.Google Scholar
Ellerman, A. D., and Buchner, B. K.. “Over-Allocation or Abatement? A Preliminary Analysis of the EU ETS Based on the 2005-06 Emissions Data.” Environmental and Resource Economics, 41 (2008), 267–287.Google Scholar
Geske, R.“The Valuation of Compound Options.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (1979), 63–81.Google Scholar
Hahn, R. W.“Market Power and Transferable Property Rights.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99 (1984), 753–765.Google Scholar
Hitzemann, S., and Uhrig-Homburg, M.. “Empirical Performance of Reduced-Form Models for Emission Permit Prices.” SSRN Working Paper No. 2297121 (2018).Google Scholar
Jarrow, R. A.“Convenience Yields.” Review of Derivatives Research, 13 (2010), 25–43.Google Scholar
Joskow, P. L.; Schmalensee, R.; and Bailey, E. M.. “The Market for Sulfur Dioxide Emissions.” American Economic Review, 88 (1998), 669–685.Google Scholar
Kijima, M.; Maeda, A.; and Nishide, K.. “Equilibrium Pricing of Contingent Claims in Tradable Permit Markets.” Journal of Futures Markets, 30 (2010), 559–589.Google Scholar
Klepper, G., and Peterson, S.. “Marginal Abatement Cost Curves in General Equilibrium: The Influence of World Energy Prices.” Resource and Energy Economics, 28 (2006), 1–23.Google Scholar
Kossoy, A., and Guigon, P.. State and Trends of the Carbon Market. Washington, DC: The World Bank (2012).Google Scholar
Litzenberger, R. H., and Rabinowitz, N.. “Backwardation in Oil Futures Markets: Theory and Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 1517–1545.Google Scholar
Montgomery, W. D.“Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs.” Journal of Economic Theory, 5 (1972), 395–418.Google Scholar
Nauclér, T., and Enkvist, P.-A.. Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy. Version 2 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve. New York, NY: McKinsey & Company (2009).Google Scholar
Rittler, D.“Price Discovery and Volatility Spillovers in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: A High-Frequency Analysis.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 36 (2012), 774–785.Google Scholar
Routledge, B. R.; Seppi, D. J.; and Spatt, C. S.. “Equilibrium Forward Curves for Commodities.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 1297–1338.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. D.“A Model of Intertemporal Emission Trading, Banking, and Borrowing.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31 (1996), 269–286.Google Scholar
Schennach, S.“The Economics of Pollution Permit Banking in the Context of Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40 (2000), 189–210.Google Scholar
Schmalensee, R.; Joskow, P. L.; Ellerman, A. D.; Montero, J. P.; and Bailey, E. M.. “An Interim Evaluation of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Trading.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12 (1998), 53–68.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E. S.“The Stochastic Behavior of Commodity Prices: Implications for Valuation and Hedging.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 923–973.Google Scholar
Seifert, J.; Uhrig-Homburg, M.; and Wagner, M. W.. “Dynamic Behavior of CO2 Spot Prices.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 56 (2008), 180–194.Google Scholar
Stavins, R. N.“Transaction Costs and Tradeable Permits.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29 (1995), 133–148.Google Scholar
Trolle, A. B., and Schwartz, E. S.. “Unspanned Stochastic Volatility and the Pricing of Commodity Derivatives.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 4423–4461.Google Scholar
Uhrig-Homburg, M., and Wagner, M.. “Futures Price Dynamics of CO2 Emission Allowances: An Empirical Analysis of the Trial Period.” Journal of Derivatives, 17 (2009), 73–88.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hitzemann and Uhrig-Homburg supplementary material

Hitzemann and Uhrig-Homburg supplementary material 1

Download Hitzemann and Uhrig-Homburg supplementary material(File)
File 267.6 KB