No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Effect of Takeover Protection in Quiet Life and Bonding Firms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Antitakeover measures are controversial because the evidence of their net effect on shareholders is mixed. We propose that, for many firms, the potential bonding benefits outweigh the agency costs of the quiet life, explaining the mixed results. We study business combination and poison pill laws as exogenous shocks to takeover vulnerability and use shareholder valuation of internal slack as an indicator of the net effect of takeover protection. Firms susceptible to quiet life agency problems exhibit a decrease in the market-assessed value of internal slack. Conversely, cash appreciates at companies where takeover protection bonds commitments with major counterparties.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington
Footnotes
We appreciate helpful comments from an anonymous referee, Mark Chen, Erik Devos (discussant), Ran Duchin, Mara Faccio (the editor), Andrey Golubov, Tom Griffin, Mark Huson, Bill Johnson, Dalida Kadyrzhanova, Jon Karpoff, Omesh Kini, Chis Parsons, Raghu Rau, Luc Renneboog, Nick Travlos, Mike Wittry, Moqi Xu (discussant), seminar participants at Georgia State University, ESTM/Humboldt University in Berlin, University of Missouri, University of Oklahoma, University of Reading, University of Surrey, University of Tilburg, and attendees at the Cass Business School Mergers and Acquisitions Conference, the Frontiers of Finance Conference in Banff, Ontario, and the Southern Finance Association meetings. We thank Randy Heron for sharing his reincorporation data with us and Tom Griffin and David Shin for data collection assistance. All errors are our responsibility.
References
Angrist, D. J., and Pischke, J. S.. Mostly Harmless Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, C. S.; Balakrishnan, K.; and Cohen, D.. “Corporate Governance and the Information Environment: Evidence from State Antitakeover Laws.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53 (2012), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atanassov, J. “Do Hostile Takeovers Stifle Innovation? Evidence from Antitakeover Legislation and Corporate Patenting.” Journal of Finance, 68 (2013), 1097–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, L.; Cohen, A.; and Ferrell, A.. “What Matters in Corporate Governance?” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 783–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bena, J., and Ting., X. “Competition and Ownership Structure of Closely Held Firms.” Review of Financial Studies, 30 (2017), 1583–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M.; Duflo, E.; and Mullainathan., S. “How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119 (2004), 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan., S. “Is There Discretion in Wage Setting? A Test Using Takeover Legislation.” Rand Journal of Economics, 30 (1999), 535–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan, S.. “Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences.” Journal of Political Economy, 111 (2003), 1043–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, N. P.; Smith, T.; and Whaley, R. E.. “Modeling the Bid/Ask Spread: Measuring the Inventory-Holding Premium.” Journal of Financial Economics, 72 (2004), 97–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgschulte, M.; Guenzel, M.; Liu, C.; and Malmendier, U.. “CEO Stress, Aging, and Death.” NBER Working Paper No. 28550 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourveau, T.; Lou, Y.; and Wang., R. “Shareholder Litigation and Corporate Disclosure: Evidence from Derivative Lawsuits.” Journal of Accounting Research, 56 (2018), 797–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, M.; McKeon, S.; and Solomon, S. D.. “Do Takeover Laws Matter? Evidence from Five Decades of Hostile Takeovers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 124 (2017), 464–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cen, L.; Dasgupta, S., and Sen, R.. “Discipline or Disruption? Stakeholder Relationships and the Effect of Takeover Threat.” Management Science, 62 (2016), 2820–2841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, R.; Looney, A., and Kroft., K. “Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence.” American Economic Review, 99 (2009), 1145–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comment, R., and Schwert, G. W.. “Poison or Placebo? Evidence on the Deterrence and Wealth Effects of Modern Antitakeover Measures.” Journal of Financial Economics, 39 (1995), 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremers, M.; Litov, L. P.; and Sepe., S. M. “Staggered Boards and Long-Term Firm value, Revisited.” Journal of Financial Economics, 126 (2017), 422–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeAngelo, H., and Rice., E. M. “Antitakeover Charter Amendments and Stockholder Wealth.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (1983), 329–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, D. J., and Sibilkov., V. “Financial Constraints, Investment, and the Value of Cash Holdings.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessaint, O., and Matray., A. “Do Managers Overreact to Salient Risks? Evidence from Hurricane Strikes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 126 (2017), 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, A., and Duchin., R. “The Dynamics of Cash.” Working Paper No. 1138, Ross School of Business, available at SSRN 1569529 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, A., and Mahrt-Smith, J.. “Corporate Governance and the Value of Cash Holdings.” Journal of Financial Economics, 83 (2007), 599–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, A.; Mahrt-Smith, J.; and Servaes, H.. “International Corporate Governance and Corporate Cash Holdings.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38 (2003), 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchin, R. “Cash Holdings and Corporate Diversification.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 955–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchin, R.; Gilbert, T.; Harford, J.; and Hrdlicka, C.. “Precautionary Savings with Risky Assets: When Cash Is Not Cash.” Journal of Finance, 72 (2017), 793–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldar, O., and Grennan, J.. “Common Venture Capital Investors and Startup Growth.” Review of Financial Studies, 37 (2024), 549–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K. R.. “Industry Costs of Equity.” Journal of Financial Economics, 43 (1997), 153–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkender, M., and Wang, R.. “Corporate Financial Policy and the Value of Cash.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 1957–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fich, E. M.; Harford, J.; and Tran, A. L.. “Disloyal Managers and Shareholders’ Wealth.” Review of Financial Studies, 36 (2023), 1837–1888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, C. F.; Hartzell, J. C.; Titman, S.; and Twite, G.. “Why Do Firms Hold So Much Cash? A Tax-Based Explanation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 86 (2007), 579–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, B. B.; Hasan, I.; John, K.; and Waisman, M.. “The Effect of State Antitakeover Laws on the Firm’s Bondholders.” Journal of Financial Economics, 96 (2010), 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, G. T., and Hanka, G.. “Capital Structure and Corporate Control: The Effect of Antitakeover Statutes on Firm Leverage.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 519–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giroud, X., and Mueller, H. M.. “Does Corporate Governance Matter in Competitive Industries?” Journal of Financial Economics, 95 (2010), 312–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gompers, P.; Ishii, J.; and Metrick, A.. “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (2003), 107–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gormley, T. A., and Matsa, D. A.. “Common Errors: How To (and Not To) Control for Unobserved Heterogeneity.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 617–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gormley, T. A., and Matsa, D. A.. “Playing it Safe? Managerial Preferences, Risk, and Agency Conflicts.” Journal of Financial Economics, 122 (2016), 431–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halford, J. T.; McConnell, J. J.; Sibilkov, V.; and Zaiats, N.. “Existing Methods Provide Unreliable Estimates of the Marginal Value of Cash.” Critical Finance Review, forthcoming (2024).Google Scholar
Harford, J. “Corporate Cash Reserves and Acquisitions.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 1969–1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harford, J.; Klasa, S., and Maxwell., W. F. “Refinancing Risk and Cash Holdings.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 975–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, D.; Ringgenberg, M. C.; Samadi, M.; and Werner, I. M.. “Reusing Natural Experiments.” Journal of Finance, 78 (2023), 2329–2364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heron, R. A., and Lewellen, W. G.. “An Empirical Analysis of the Reincorporation Decision.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 33 (1998) 549–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, J. R. “Annual Survey of Economic Theory: The Theory of Monopoly.” Econometrica, 3 (1935), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. C. “Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers.” American Economic Review, 76 (1986), 323–329.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H.. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. C., and Ruback, R. S.. “The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (1983), 5–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, K.; Li, Y.; and Pang, J.. “Does Corporate Governance Matter More for High Financial Slack Firms?” Management Science, 63 (2017), 1872–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. C.; Karpoff, J. M.; and Yi, S.. “The Bonding Hypothesis of Takeover Defenses: Evidence from IPO Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 117 (2015), 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. C.; Karpoff, J. M.; and Yi, S.. “The Life Cycle Effects of Corporate Takeover Defenses.” Review of Financial Studies, 35 (2022), 2879–2927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpoff, J. M.; Schonlau, R.; and Wehrly, E.. “Which Antitakeover Provisions Deter Takeovers?” Journal of Corporate Finance, 75 (2022), 102218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpoff, J. M., and Wittry, M. D.. “Institutional and Legal Context in Natural Experiments: The Case of State Antitakeover Laws.” Journal of Finance, 73 (2018), 657–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korteweg, A.G. “The Costs of Financial Distress Across Industries.” Available at SSRN 945425 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, J. D.; Barber, B. M.; and Tsai, C. L. Ling. “Improved Methods for Tests of Long‐Run Abnormal Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 165–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masulis, R., and Reza, S.. “Agency Problems of Corporate Philanthropy.” Review of Financial Studies, 28 (2014), 592–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelson, W., and Partch, M.. “Do Persistent Large Cash Reserves Hinder Performance?” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38 (2003), 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opler, T.; Pinkowitz, L.; Stulz, R.; and Williamson, R.. “The Determinants and Implications of Corporate Cash Holdings.” Journal of Financial Economics, 52 (1999), 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkowitz, L., and Williamson., R. “Bank Power and Cash Holdings: Evidence from Japan.” Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2001), 1059–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkowitz, L., and Williamson, R.. “What is the Market Value of a Dollar of Corporate Cash?” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19 (2007), 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J.; Shi, J.; Smith, T.; and Whaley, R.. “Common Divisors, Payout Persistence, and Return Predictability.” International Review of Finance, 9 (2009), 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, J., and Yu, F.. “The Market for Corporate Control and the Cost of Debt.” Journal of Financial Economics, 93 (2009), 505–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M., and Whited, T.. “Endogeneity in Empirical Corporate Finance.” Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 2 (2013), 493–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, W. “Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples.” Stata Technical Bulletin, 13 (1993), 19–23.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A., and Summers, L. H.. “Breach of Trust in Hostile Takeovers. In Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1988), 33–68.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.. “A Survey of Corporate Governance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, J. “Takeover Threats and Managerial Myopia.” Journal of Political Economy, 96 (1988), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stulz, R. “Managerial Control of Voting Rights: Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stulz, R. “Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financing Policies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 26 (1990), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fich et al. supplementary material
Fich et al. supplementary material
File
156.7 KB
You have
Access
Open access