Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:17:13.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Shareholder Litigation Risk Cause Public Firms to Delist? Evidence from Securities Class Action Lawsuits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2023

Jonathan Brogaard ,
Nhan Le ,
Duc Duy Nguyen Open the ORCID record for Duc Duy Nguyen [Opens in a new window]  and
Vathunyoo Sila Open the ORCID record for Vathunyoo Sila [Opens in a new window]
Jonathan Brogaard
Affiliation:
David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah [email protected]
Nhan Le
Affiliation:
Research School of Finance, Actuarial Studies and Statistics, Australian National University [email protected]
Duc Duy Nguyen*
Affiliation:
Durham University Business School, Durham University
Vathunyoo Sila
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh Business School, University of Edinburgh [email protected]
*
[email protected] (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using three exogenous shocks to ex ante litigation risk, including federal judge ideology and two influential judicial precedents, we find that lower shareholder litigation risk reduces a firm’s propensity to delist from the U.S. stock markets. The effect is at least partially driven by indirect costs of litigation and that being a private firm can significantly reduce the threat of litigation. Overall, the results suggest that mitigating excessive litigation costs for public firms is crucial to ensure the continued vibrancy of the U.S. stock market.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , June 2024 , pp. 1726 - 1759
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Footnotes

We are grateful to an anonymous referee, Jiafu An, Mascia Bedendo, Jennifer Conrad (the editor), Alan Crane, Ettore Croci, Craig Doidge, Rawley Heimer (discussant), Mikael Homanen, Dirk Jenter, Elisabeth Kempf, Sandy Klasa, Christian Leuz, Ross Levine, Ivan Lim, Ernst Maug, Paula Suh (discussant), Anh Tran (discussant), Shang-Jin Wei, and seminar participants at Australian National University and the 2019 ICGS and 2019 KAIST conferences for very helpful comments and suggestions. We thank Haoyan Chen and Lukman Hakim for their excellent research assistance. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

Asker, J.; Farre-Mensa, J.; and Ljungqvist, A.. “Comparing the Investment Behavior of Public and Private Firms.” NBER Working Paper, No. 17394 (2011).10.3386/w17394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzuza, M. “Market Segmentation: The Rise of Nevada as a Liability-Free Jurisdiction.” Virginia Law Review, 98 (2012), 935–1000.Google Scholar
Barzuza, M., and Smith, D. C.. “What Happens in Nevada? Self-Selecting into Lax Law.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 3593–3627.10.1093/rfs/hhu058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, P., and Von Thadden, E.. “Blocks, Liquidity, and Corporate Control.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 1–25.10.1111/0022-1082.15240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudette, N. E., and Phillips, M.. “Elon Musk Says Tesla May Go Private, and its Stock Soars.” The New York Times, Aug. 7, 2018.Google Scholar
Bowie, J., and Songer, D.. “Assessing the Applicability of Strategic Theory to Explain Decision Making on the Courts of Appeals.” Political Research Quarterly, 62 (2009), 393–407.10.1177/1065912908319253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, T. “Optimal Investment Financing Decisions and the Value of Confidentiality.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 14 (1979), 913–924.10.2307/2330297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, S., and Cooper, C.. “The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions on People at Work: Existing Research and Issues.” British Journal of Management, 1 (1990), 65–76.10.1111/j.1467-8551.1990.tb00163.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazier, R.; Christensen, T.; Merkle, K. J.; and Treu, J.. “Litigation Risk and Non-GAAP Reporting.” Working Paper, University of North Texas, University of Georgia, Indiana University, and West Virginia University (2016).10.2139/ssrn.2928260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B.; Srinivasan, S.; and Yu, G.. “Securities Litigation Risk for Foreign Companies Listed in the U.S.” Working Paper, Harvard University and University of Michigan (2014).Google Scholar
Choi, S.; Gulati, M.; and Posner, E.. “What Do Federal District Judges Want? An Analysis of Publications, Citations, and Reversals.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 28 (2012), 518–549.10.1093/jleo/ewq020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on Capital Market Regulation. Interim Report of the Committee on Capital Market Regulation, https://capmktsreg.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Interim-Report-of-the-Committee-on-Capital-Markets-Regulation-1.pdf (2006).Google Scholar
Cox, D.; Thomas, S.; and Bai, L.. “Do Differences in Pleading Standards Cause Forum Shopping in Securities Class Actions: Doctrinal and Empirical Analyses.” Wisconsin Law Review, 2009 (2009), 421–253.Google Scholar
Crane, A., and Koch, A.. “Shareholder Litigation and Ownership Structure: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Management Science, 64 (2018), 5–23.10.1287/mnsc.2016.2561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, F. “Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” California Law Review, 91 (2003), 1457–1515.10.2307/3481397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, F., and Tiller, E.. “Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals.” Yale Law Journal, 107 (1998), 2155–2176.10.2307/797418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djama, C.; Martinez, I.; and Serve, S.. “What Do We Know About Delistings? A Survey of the Literature.” Working Paper, University of Toulouse and University of Cergy Pontoise (2014).Google Scholar
Doidge, C.; Karolyi, A.; and Stulz, R.. “Why Do Foreign Firms Leave U.S. Equity Markets?” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 1507–1553.10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01577.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doidge, C.; Karolyi, A.; and Stulz, R.. “The U.S. Listing Gap.” Journal of Financial Economics, 123 (2017), 464–487.10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donelson, D. C., and Yust, C. G.. “Litigation Risk and Agency Costs: Evidence from Nevada Corporate Law.” Journal of Law and Economics, 57 (2014), 747–780.10.1086/675942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easley, D.; Hvidkjaer, S.; and O’Hara, M.. “Is Information Risk a Determinant of Asset Returns?” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 2185–2221.10.1111/1540-6261.00493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, E.; Hayes, R.; and Wang, X.. “The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and Firms’ Going-Private Decisions.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44 (2007), 116–145.10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.. “New Lists: Fundamentals and Survival Rates.” Journal of Financial Economics, 73 (2004), 229–269.10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedderke, J., and Ventoruzzo, M.. “Do Conservative Justices Favor Wall Street? Ideology and the Supreme Court’s Securities Regulation Decisions.” Florida Law Review, 67 (2016), 1211–1280.Google Scholar
Fernandes, N.; Lel, U.; and Miller, D. P.. “Escape from New York: The Market Impact of Loosening Disclosure Requirements.” Journal of Financial Economics, 95 (2010), 129–147.10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, G.; Holian, D.; and Mezey, S.. “An Integrated Model of Privacy Decision Making in State Supreme Courts.” American Politics Quarterly, 26 (1998), 35–58.10.1177/1532673X9802600103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, L., and Karolyi, A.. “An Unexpected Test of the Bonding Hypothesis.” Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 7 (2018), 101–156.10.1093/rcfs/cfx021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gande, A., and Lewis, C.. “Shareholder-Initiated Class Action Lawsuits: Shareholder Wealth Effects and Industry Spillovers.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44 (2009), 823–850.10.1017/S0022109009990202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gande, A., and Miller, P.. “Why Do U.S. Securities Laws Matter to Non-U.S. Firms? Evidence from Private Class-Action Lawsuits.” Working Paper, Southern Methodist University (2012).10.2139/ssrn.2023733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, H.; Harford, J.; and Li, K.. “Determinants of Corporate Cash Policy: Insights from Private Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 109 (2013), 623–639.10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.04.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, S. D., and Park, K.. “The Quixotic Search for Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court: A Cross-Judicial Empirical Analysis of the Rehnquist Court Justices.” American Political Science Review (1997), 390–408.10.2307/2952363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundfest, J., and Pritchard, C.. “Statutes with Multiple Personality Disorders: The Value of Ambiguity in Statutory Design and Interpretation.” Stanford Law Review, 54 (2002), 627–736.10.2307/1229575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hail, L., and Leuz, C.. “International Differences in Cost of Capital: Do Legal Institutions and Securities Regulation Matter?” Journal of Accounting Research, 44 (2006), 485–531.10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00209.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, P., and Palepu, K.. “Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31 (2001), 405–440.10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, J.; Lin, C.; Liu, S.; and Wei, L.. “Litigation Risk and Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from Legal Changes.” Accounting Review, 94 (2019), 247–272.10.2308/accr-52355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, A.; Hui, K.; and Li, R.. “Federal Judge Ideology: A New Measure of Ex Ante Litigation Risk.” Journal of Accounting Research, 57 (2019), 431–489.10.1111/1475-679X.12260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrell, G. A. “The Economic Effects of Federal Regulation of the Market for New Security Issues.” Journal of Law and Economics, 24 (1981), 613–675.10.1086/467002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. F.; Nelson, K.; and Pritchard, C.. “In Re Silicon Graphics Inc.: Shareholder Wealth Effects Resulting from the Interpretation of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act’s Pleading Standard.” Southern California Law Review, 73 (2000), 773–810.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. “Securities Class Actions in State Court.” University of Cincinnati Law Review, 80 (2012), 349–388.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. F.; Kasznik, R.; and Nelson, K.. “Shareholder Wealth Effects of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.” Review of Accounting Studies, 5 (2000), 217–233.10.1023/A:1009612610389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. F.; Kasznik, R.; and Nelson, K.. “The Impact of Securities Litigation Reform on the Disclosure of Forward-Looking Information by High Technology Firms.” Journal of Accounting Research, 9 (2001), 297–327.10.1111/1475-679X.00014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahle, K., and Stulz, R.. “Is the U.S. Public Corporation in Trouble?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31 (2017), 67–88.10.1257/jep.31.3.67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempf, E., and Spalt, O.. “Attracting the Sharks: Corporate Innovation and Securities Class Action Lawsuits.” Management Science, 69 (2023), 1323–1934.10.1287/mnsc.2022.4388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, I., and Skinner, D.. “Measuring Securities Litigation Risk.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53 (2012), 290–310.10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W., and Weisbach, M.. “Motivations for Public Equity Offers: An International Perspective.” Journal of Financial Economics, 87 (2008), 281–307.10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.09.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnan, C. N. V.; Masulis, R. W.; Thomas, R. S.; and Thompson, R. B.. “Shareholder Litigation in Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 18 (2012), 1248–1268.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, W.. “Law and Finance.” Journal of Political Economy, 106 (1998), 1113–1155.10.1086/250042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, T. “The Incidental Parameter Problem Since 1948.” Journal of Econometrics, 95 (2000), 391–413.10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00044-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuz, C.; Triantis, A.; and Wang, T.. “Why Do Firms Go Dark? Causes and Economic Consequences of Voluntary SEC Deregistrations.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45 (2008), 181–208.10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C.; Liu, S.; and Manso, G.. “Shareholder Litigation and Corporate Innovation.” Management Science, 67 (2020), 3321–3984.Google Scholar
Lin, C.; Officer, M.; Schmid, T.; and Zou, H.. “Is Skin in the Game a Game Changer? Evidence from Mandatory Changes of D&O Insurance Policies.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 68 (2019), 101225.10.1016/j.jacceco.2019.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licht, A.; Poliquin, C.; Siegel, J.; and Xi, L.. “What Makes the Bonding Stick? A Natural Experiment Testing the Legal Bonding Hypothesis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 129 (2018), 329–356.10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ljungvist, A.; Persson, L.; and Tag, J.. “The Incredible Shrinking Stock Market: On the Political Economy Consequences of Excessive Delistings.” Working Paper, Stockholm School of Economics and Research Institute of Industrial Economics (2018).Google Scholar
Marosi, A., and Massoud, N.. “Why Do Firms Go Dark?” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42 (2007), 421–442.10.1017/S0022109000003331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehran, H., and Peristiani, S.. “Financial Visibility and the Decision to Go Private.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2011), 519–547.10.1093/rfs/hhp044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. “A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information.” Journal of Finance, 42 (1987), 483–510.10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04565.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyman, J., and Scott, E.. “Consistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations.” Econometrica, 16 (1948), 1–32.10.2307/1914288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oster, E. “Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 37 (2019), 87–204.10.1080/07350015.2016.1227711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagano, M.; Panetta, F.; and Zingales, L.. “Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 27–64.10.1111/0022-1082.25448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinello, D. “Linking Party to Judicial Ideology in American Courts: A Meta-Analysis.” Justice System Journal, 20 (1999), 219–254.Google Scholar
Pour, E., and Lasfer, M.. “Why Do Companies Delist Voluntarily from the Stock Market?” Journal of Banking and Finance, 37 (2013), 4850–4860.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.08.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, A. “Securities Law in the Roberts Court: Agenda or Indifference.” Journal of Corporate Law, 37 (2011), 105–145.Google Scholar
Randazzo, K. “Strategic Anticipation and the Hierarchy of Justice in U.S. District Courts.” American Politics Research, 36 (2008), 669–693.10.1177/1532673X08317286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, J. “The Costs of Going Public.” Journal of Financial Economics, 19 (1987), 269–281.10.1016/0304-405X(87)90005-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J., and Buskirk, A.. “Shareholder Litigation and Changes in Disclosure Behavior.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 47 (2009), 136–156.10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, R. “The Shareholder Suit: Litigation Without Foundation?” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7 (1991), 55–87.Google Scholar
Saunders, A., and Steffen, S.. “The Costs of Being Private: Evidence from the Loan Market.” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2011), 4091–4122.10.1093/rfs/hhr083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiess, K., and Paula, T.. “The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The Stock Market Casts its Vote.” Managerial and Decision Economics, 18 (1997), 545–561.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1468(199711/12)18:7/8<545::AID-MDE865>3.0.CO;2-#3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staudt, N.; Epstein, L.; and Wiedenbeck, P.. “The Ideological Component of Judging in the Taxation Context.” Washington University Law Review, 84 (2006), 1797–1821.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. “Public Regulation of the Securities Markets.” Journal of Business, 37 (1964), 117–142.10.1086/294677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C.; Schkade, D.; and Ellman, L.. “Ideological Voting on Federal Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Investigation.” Virginia Law Review, 90 (2004), 301–354.10.2307/3202429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform. A Rising Threat – The New Class Action Racket that Harms Investors and the Economy. Washington, DC: U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (2018).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Brogaard et al. supplementary material

Internet Appendix

Download Brogaard et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 149.7 KB