Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:40:26.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Cross-Section Analysis of Demand Deposit Variability**

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Neil B. Murphy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Commercial bank portfolio models developed by Hester [6], Porter [11], and Kane and Malkiel [7], among others, relate the structure of an asset portfolio to variation in the level of deposits. Similarly, in a recent application of linear programming to asset management, Cohen and Hammer [3] specify a liquidity constraint based upon deposit fluctuations. However, there have been few empirical studies of the determinants of demand deposit fluctuations. The purpose of this paper is to extend the work of Gramley [4], Rangarajan [12], and Wilkerson [14] on the determinants of deposit variability. In this paper, the analysis will be confined to demand deposit variability.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 1968 , pp. 87 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Baxter, N. D., and Shapiro, H. T., “Compensating—Balance Requirements: The Results of a Survey,” Journal of Finance, XIX (09 1964), pp. 483–496.Google Scholar
[2]Bell, F. W., and Murphy, N. B., costs in Commercial Banking: A quantitative Analysis of Bank Behavior and its Relation to Bank Regulation, Research Report, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 03 1968.Google Scholar
[3]Cohen, K. J., and Hammer, F. S., “Linear Programming and Optimal Bank. Asset Management Decisions,” Journal of Finance, XXII (05 1967), pp. 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Gramley, L. E., “Deposit Instability at Individual Banks,” Essaya on Commercial Banking, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 1962, pp. 41–53.Google Scholar
[5]Hayes, D. A., Bank Lending Poilcies: Issues and Practices (Ann Arbor, Michigan: Bureau of Business Research, University of Michigan, 1964).Google Scholar
[6]Hester, D. D., “An Empirical Examination of a Commercial Bank Loan Offer Function,” yale Economic Essays, II (01 1962), pp. 3–57.Google Scholar
[7]Kane, E. J., and Malkiel, B. G., “Bank Portfolio Allocation, Deposit Variability, and the Availability Doctrine,” Quarterly Journal of Economices, LXXIX (02 1965), pp. 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]McCall, J. J., “Differences Between the Personal Demand for Money and the Business Demand for Money,” Journal of Political Economy, LXVIII (08 1960), pp. 358–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]McGouldrick, P. F., “A Sectoral Analysis of Velocity,” Federal Reserve Bullation, XLVIII (12 1962), pp. 1557–1570.Google Scholar
[10]Morrison, G. R., and Selden, R. T., Time Depostit Growth and the Employment of Bank Funds (Chicago: Association of Reserve City Bankers, 1965).Google Scholar
[11]Porter, R. C., “A Model of Bank Portfolio Selection,” Yala Economic Essaya, I (02 1961), pp. 323–359.Google Scholar
[12]Rangarajan, C., “Deposit Variability in Individual Banks,” National Banking Review, IV (09 1966), pp. 61–71.Google Scholar
[13]Selden, R. T., “The Postwar Rise in the Velocity of Money: A Sectoral Analysis,” Journal of Finance, XVI (12 1961), pp. 483–545.Google Scholar
[14]Wilkerson, C. H., “Deposit Fluctuations at Individual Banks,” Unpublished Thesis, Stonier Graduate School of Banking, Rutgers University, 1966.Google Scholar