Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:24:41.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Creating Value by Changing the Old Guard: The Impact of Controlling Shareholder Heterogeneity on Firm Performance and Corporate Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2014

Hua Deng ,
Fariborz Moshirian ,
Peter Kien Pham  and
Jason Zein
Hua Deng
Affiliation:
[email protected], College of Business and Economics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia;
Fariborz Moshirian
Affiliation:
[email protected],
Peter Kien Pham
Affiliation:
peter.pham@unsw .edu.au,
Jason Zein
Affiliation:
[email protected], Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theory suggests that controlling shareholders can influence firm value through both shared benefits creation and private benefits consumption. Using negotiated control-block transfers from 31 countries, we look beyond ownership concentration and investigate how controlling shareholder heterogeneity influences the relative importance of these two effects. We document that a control transfer precipitates positive firm outcomes particularly when the vendor has maintained control over an extended period and the acquirer displays a strong incentive to engage in restructuring. In such cases, we observe a sustained positive price reaction, more focused corporate investments, lower leverage, higher operating efficiency, and superior long-term performance.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 48 , Issue 6 , December 2013 , pp. 1781 - 1811
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albuquerque, R., and Schroth, E.. “Quantifying Private Benefits of Control from a Structural Model of Block Trades.” Journal of Financial Economics, 96 (2010), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, H. V., and Wolfenzon, D.. “A Theory of Pyramidal Ownership and Family Business Groups.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 2637–2680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M., and Gompers, P. A.. “The Determinants of Board Structure at the Initial Public Offering.” Journal of Law and Economics, 46 (2003), 569–598.Google Scholar
Barber, B. M., and Lyon, J. D.. “Detecting Abnormal Operating Performance: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics.” Journal of Financial Economics, 41 (1996), 359–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, M. J., and Holderness, C. G.. “Private Benefits from Control of Public Corporations.” Journal of Financial Economics, 25 (1989), 371–395.Google Scholar
Barclay, M. J., and Holderness, C. G.. “Negotiated Block Trades and Corporate Control.” Journal of Finance, 25 (1991), 861–878.Google Scholar
Barclay, M. J., and Holderness, C. G.. “The Law and Large-Block Trades.” Journal of Law and Economics, 35 (1992), 265–294.Google Scholar
Becker, B.; Cronqvist, H.; and Fahlenbrach, R.. “Estimating the Effects of Large Shareholders Using a Geographic Instrument.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46 (2011), 907–942.Google Scholar
Bennedsen, M.; Nielsen, K. M.; Pérez-González, F.; and Wolfenzon, D.. “Inside the Family Firm: The Role of Families in Succession Decisions and Performance.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122 (2007), 647–691.Google Scholar
Berkman, H.; Cole, R. A.; and Fu, L. J.. “Improving Corporate Governance Where the State Is the Controlling Block Holder: Evidence from China.” European Journal of Finance, forthcoming (2013).Google Scholar
Bethel, J. E.; Liebeskind, J. P.; and Opler, T.. “Block Share Purchases and Corporate Performance.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 606–634.Google Scholar
Burkart, M.; Gromb, D.; and Panunzi, F.. “Why Higher Takeover Premia Protect Minority Shareholders.” Journal of Political Economy, 106 (1998), 172–204.Google Scholar
Burkart, M.; Gromb, D.; and Panunzi, F.. “Agency Conflicts in Public and Negotiated Transfers of Corporate Control.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 647–677.Google Scholar
Claessens, S.; Djankov, S.; Fan, J. P. H.; and Lang, L. H. P.. “Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 2741–2771.Google Scholar
Claessens, S.; Djankov, S.; and Lang, L. H. P.. “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations.” Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (2000), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croci, E. “Corporate Raiders, Performance and Governance in Europe.” European Financial Management, 13 (2007), 949–978.Google Scholar
Cronqvist, H., and Fahlenbrach, R.. “Large Shareholders and Corporate Policies.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 3941–3976.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H., and Lehn, K.. “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences.” Journal of Political Economy, 93 (1985), 1155–1177.Google Scholar
Dyck, A., and Zingales, L.. “Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 537–600.Google Scholar
Edmans, A. “Blockholder Trading, Market Efficiency, and Managerial Myopia.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 2481–2513.Google Scholar
Faccio, M., and Lang, L. H. P.. “The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations.” Journal of Financial Economics, 65 (2002), 365–395.Google Scholar
Fahlenbrach, R. “Shareholder Rights, Boards and CEO Compensation.” Review of Finance, 13 (2009), 81–113.Google Scholar
Gompers, P. A.; Ishii, J. L.; and Metrick, A.. “Extreme Governance: An Analysis of Dual-Class Firms in the United States.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 1051–1088.Google Scholar
Grossman, S. J., and Hart, O.. “One Share-One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 175–202.Google Scholar
Healy, P. M.; Palepu, K. G.; and Ruback, R. S.. “Does Corporate Performance Improve after Mergers?” Journal of Financial Economics, 31 (1992), 135–175.Google Scholar
Hermalin, B. E., and Weisbach, M. S.. “Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEO.” American Economic Review, 88 (1998), 96–118.Google Scholar
Hill, C. W. L., and Phan, P.. “CEO Tenure as a Determinant of CEO Pay.” Academy of Management Journal, 34 (1991), 707–717.Google Scholar
Himmelberg, C. P.; Hubbard, R. G.; and Palia, D.. “Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link between Ownership and Value.” Journal of Financial Economics, 53 (1999), 353–384.Google Scholar
Holderness, C. G.; Kroszner, R. S.; and Sheehan, D. P.. “Were the Good Old Days That Good? Changes in Managerial Stock Ownership Since the Great Depression.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999),435–469.Google Scholar
Holderness, C. G., and Sheehan, D. P.. “The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly Held Corporations.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 317–346.Google Scholar
Kahn, C., and Winton, A.. “Ownership Structure, Speculation, and Shareholder Intervention.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 99–129.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D.; Kraay, A.; and Mastruzzi, M.. “Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996–2002.” Working Paper, World Bank. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=405841 (2006).Google Scholar
Klein, A., and Zur, M.. “Entrepreneurial Shareholder Activism: Hedge Funds and Other PrivateInvestors.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 187–229.Google Scholar
La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R.. “Law and Finance.” Journal of Political Economy, 106 (1998), 1113–1155.Google Scholar
Malmendier, U., and Tate, G.. “Who Makes Acquisitions? CEO Overconfidence and the Market’s Reaction.” Journal of Financial Economics, 89 (2008), 20–43.Google Scholar
Masulis, R. W.; Pham, P. K.; and Zein, J.. “Family Business Groups around the World: Financing Advantages, Control Motivations and Organizational Choices.” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2011), 3556–3600.Google Scholar
McConnell, J., and Servaes, H.. “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.” Journal of Financial Economics, 27 (1990), 595–612.Google Scholar
Moeller, S.; Schlingemann, F.; and Stulz, R.. “Wealth Destruction on a Massive Scale? A Study of Acquiring-Firm Returns in the Recent Merger Wave.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 757–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morck, R.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 293–315.Google Scholar
Pagano, M., and Volpin, P.. “Political Economy of Corporate Governance.” American Economic Review, 95 (2005), 1005–1030.Google Scholar
Rossi, S., and Volpin, P.. “Cross-Country Determinants of Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal ofFinancial Economics, 74 (2004), 277–304.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W.. “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control.” Journal of Political Economy, 95 (1986), 461–488.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A., and Wolfenzon, D.. “Investor Protection and Equity Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 66 (2002), 3–27.Google Scholar
Stulz, R. “Managerial Control of Voting Rights: Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 25–54.Google Scholar
Villalonga, B., and Amit, R.. “How Do Family Ownership, Control and Management Affect Firm Value?” Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (2006), 385–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar