Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T04:11:14.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corporate Leadership and Inherited Beliefs About Gender Roles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2023

R. David McLean ,
Christo Pirinsky  and
Mengxin Zhao
R. David McLean*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Christo Pirinsky
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida [email protected]
Mengxin Zhao
Affiliation:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission [email protected]
*
[email protected] (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Some U.S. firms have women directors and executives, while many do not. We seek to explain this heterogeneity. Using U.S. Census data from 1900, we find that U.S. counties with populations originating from countries with stronger gender-egalitarian beliefs have more women in the labor market and in STEM occupations, and lower gender-pay gaps. Firms headquartered in such counties have more women executives and directors. When firms move to more gender-egalitarian counties, the representation of women on board increases. Our findings are consistent with the idea that inherited beliefs about gender roles impact the labor market and corporate leadership.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 58 , Issue 8 , December 2023 , pp. 3274 - 3304
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Footnotes

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission disclaims responsibility for any private publication or statement of any SEC employee or Commissioner. This article expresses the author’s views and does not necessarily reflect those of the Commission, the Commissioners, or members of the staff. We are grateful for the helpful comments from an anonymous referee, Kee-Hong Bae, Diane Denis, Mara Faccio (the editor), Mike Hertzel, Gilles Hilary, Jun-Koo Kang, Daniel Urban, seminar participants at Georgetown University, Georgia Tech, George Mason, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Chinese University of Hong Kong, and Nanyang Technological University, and participants at the Northern Finance Association Meeting 2021.

References

Adams, R., and Ferreira, D.. “Women in the Boardroom and their Impact on Governance and Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 94 (2009), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R., and Funk, P.. “Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Does Gender Matter?” Management Science, 58 (2011), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R., and Kirchmaier, T.. “Barriers to Boardrooms.” Working Paper, European Corporate Governance Institute (2015).Google Scholar
Adams, R., and Kirchmaier, T.. “Women on Boards in Finance and STEM Industries.” American Economic Review, 106 (2016), 277–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahern, K.; Daminelli, D.; and Fracassi, C.. “Lost in Translation? The Effect of Cultural Values on Mergers Around the World.” Journal of Financial Economics, 117 (2015), 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahern, K., and Dittmar, A.. “The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127 (2012), 137–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A.; Giuliano, P.; and Nunn, N.. “On the Origins of Gender Roles: Women and the Plough.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128 (2013), 469–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelov, N.; Johansson, P.; and Lindahl, E.. “Parenthood and the Gender Gap in Pay.” Journal of Labor Economics, 34 (2016), 545–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azmat, G., and Ferrer, R.. “Gender Gaps in Performance: Evidence from Young Lawyers.” Journal of Political Economy, 125 (2017), 1306–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B.; Scherbina, A.; and Schlusche, B.. “Performance Isn’t Everything: Personal Characteristics and Career Outcomes of Mutual Fund Managers.” Working Paper, UC Davis (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M.; Black, S.; Jensen, S.; and Lleras-Muney, A.. “Breaking the Glass Ceiling? The Effect of Board Quotas on Female Labour Market Outcomes in Norway.” Review of Economic Studies, 86 (2019), 191–239.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M.; Goldin, C.; and Katz, L.. “Dynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Financial and Corporate Sectors.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2 (2010), 228–255.Google Scholar
Bisin, A., and Verdier, T.. “Beyond the Melting Pot’: Cultural Transmission, Marriage, and the Evolution of Ethnic and Religious Traits.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (2000), 955–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottazzi, L.; Da Rin, M.; and Hellmann, T.. “The Importance of Trust for Investment: Evidence from Venture Capital.” Review of Financial Studies, 29 (2016), 2283–2318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrasco, F.; Labelle, R.; Laffarga, J.; and Ruiz-Barbadillo, E.. “Appointing Women to Boards: Is there a Cultural Bias?” Journal of Business Ethics, 126 (2015), 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, K.; Guryan, J.; and Pan, J.. “The Effects of Sexism on American Women: The Role of Norms vs. Discrimination.” Working Paper, University of Chicago (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Noia, J. “Indicators of Gender Egalitarianism for American Sates and Regions: An Update.” Social Indicators Research, 59 (2002), 35–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchin, R.; Simutin, M.; and Sosyura, D.. “The Origins and Real Effects of the Gender Gap: Evidence from CEOs’ Formative Years.” Review of Financial Studies, 34 (2020), 700–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckbo, E.; Nygaard, K.; and Karin, T.. “Valuation Effects of Norway’s Board Gender-Quota Law Revisited.” Management Science, 68 (2022), 4112–4134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, L.; Souther, M.; and Yore, A.. “At the Table but Can’t Break Through the Glass Ceiling: Board Leadership Positions Elude Diverse Directors.” Journal of Financial Economics, 137 (2020), 787–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D.; Li, K.; and Xu, T.. “Board Gender Diversity, Corporate Innovation, and Firm Value: International Evidence.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56 (2021), 123–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiso, L.; Monte, F.; Sapienza, P.; and Zingales, L.. “Culture, Gender, and Math.” Science, 320 (2008), 1164–1165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guiso, L.; Sapienza, P.; and Zingales, L.. “Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124 (2009), 1095–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications (1980).Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (2001).Google Scholar
Huang, J., and Kisgen, D.. “Gender and Corporate Finance: Are Male Executives Overconfident Relative to Female Executives?” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 822–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, B.-H. “Country-Specific Sentiment and Security Prices.” Journal of Financial Economics, 100 (2011), 382–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, S.; Shivdasani, A.; and Simintzi, E.. “Mandating Women on Boards: Evidence from the United States” Working Paper, Keenan Institute (2010).Google Scholar
Inglehart, R.; Haerpfer, C.; Moreno, A.; Welzel, C.; Kizilova, K.; Diez-Medrano, J.; Lagos, M.; Norris, P.; Ponarin, E.; Puranen, B. et al. (eds.). World Values Survey: All Rounds - Country-Pooled Datafile Version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute (2014). https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWVL.jsp.Google Scholar
Keluoharju, M.; Knüpfer, S.; and Tåg, J.. “What Prevents Women from Reaching the Top?” Financial Management, 51 (2022), 711–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D. and Starks, L.. “Gender Diversity on Corporate Boards: Do Women Contribute Unique Skills?” American Economic Review, 106 (2016), 267–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleven, H.; Landais, C.; and Søgaard, J.. “Children and Gender Inequality: Evidence from Denmark.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11 (2019), 181–209.Google Scholar
Knyazeva, A.; Knyazeva, D.; and Masulis, R.. “The Supply of Corporate Directors and Board Independence.” Review of Financial Studies, 26 (2013), 1561–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, M.; Li, K.; and Zhang, F.. “Director Gender and Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 28 (2014), 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsa, D., and Miller, A.. “Chipping Away at the Glass Ceiling: Gender Spillovers in Corporate Leadership.” American Economic Review, 101 (2011), 635–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, H.; Bertsch, A.; Warner-Soderholm, G.; and Ondracek, J.. “Understanding Cultural Factors which Affect Women Serving on Boards of Directors.” International Research Journal of Human Resources and Social Sciences, 4 (2017), 278–305.Google Scholar
O*NET. “All STEM Disciplines.” (2015) http://www.onetonline.org/find/stem/?t=0 (accessed Sept. 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Petersen, M. “Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 435–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, T., and Coates, D.. “Gender Role Attitudes in the Southern United States, Gender and Society.” Gender and Scoiety, 9 (1995), 744–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggles, S.; Flood, S.; Goeken, R.; Grover, J.; Meyer, E.; Pacas, J.; and Sobek, M., IPUMS USA: Version 8.0. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS (2018). https://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V8.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, G., and Liu, Y.. “Female Leadership and Gender Equity: Evidence from Plant Closure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 117 (2015), 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Meyerinck, F.; Niessen-Ruenzi, A.; Schmid, M.; and Solomon, S.. “As California Goes, So Goes the Nation? Board Gender Quotas and Shareholders’ Distaste of Government Interventions.” Working Paper, European Corporate Governance Institute (2021).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

McLean et al. supplementary material

McLean et al. supplementary material

Download McLean et al. supplementary material(File)
File 153.9 KB