Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:10:24.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can the Cross-Sectional Variation in Expected Stock Returns Explain Momentum?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2009

George Bulkley
Affiliation:
Business School, University of Exeter, Streatham Court, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4ST, UK. [email protected]
Vivekanand Nawosah
Affiliation:
Essex Business School, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, CO4 3SQ, UK. [email protected]

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that momentum might be rationally explained as a consequence of the cross-sectional variation of unconditional expected returns. Stocks with relatively high unconditional expected returns will on average outperform in both the portfolio formation period and in the subsequent holding period. We evaluate this explanation by first removing unconditional expected returns for each stock from raw returns and then testing for momentum in the resulting series. We measure the unconditional expected return on each stock as its mean return in the whole sample period. We find momentum effects vanish in demeaned returns.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, D.-H.; Conrad, J.; and Dittmar, R. F.. “Risk Adjustment and Trading Strategies.” Review of Financial Studies, 16 (2003), 459485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, J.; Green, R.; and Naik, V.. “Optimal Investment, Growth Options and Security Returns.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 15531607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chordia, T., and Shivakumar, L.. “Momentum, Business Cycle, and Time-Varying Expected Returns.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 9851019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, J., and Kaul, G.. “An Anatomy of Trading Strategies.” Review of Financial Studies, 11 (1998), 489519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F.Market Efficiency, Long-Term Returns, and Behavioral Finance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 49 (1998), 283306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 5584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundy, B. D., and Martin, J. S.. “Understanding the Nature of the Risks and the Source of the Rewards to Momentum Investing.” Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2001), 2978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jegadeesh, N., and Titman, S.. “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 6591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jegadeesh, N., and Titman, S.. “Profitability of Momentum Strategies: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 699720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T. C.Rational Momentum Effects.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 585608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korajczyk, R. A., and Sadka, R.. “Are Momentum Profits Robust to Trading Costs?Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 10391082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewellen, J. “Momentum and Autocorrelation in Stock Returns.” Review of Financial Studies, 15 (2002), 533563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lintner, J. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 47 (1965), 1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, A. W., and MacKinlay, A. C.. “When Are Contrarian Profits Due to Stock Market Overreaction?Review of Financial Studies, 3 (1990), 175205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moskowitz, T. J., and Grinblatt, M.. “Do Industries Explain Momentum?Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 12491290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouwenhorst, K. G.International Momentum Strategies.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 267284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, W. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk.” Journal of Finance, 19 (1964), 425442.Google Scholar