Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:14:27.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beta Nonstationarity, Portfolio Residual Risk and Diversification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Son-Nan Chen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over the past years the beta coefficient has been widely used as a measure of systematic risk in investment and portfolio analysis. The validity of using the beta coefficient as the proper measure of systematic risk is dependent upon the assumption that the beta coefficient is stationary over time. Unfortunately, this assumption has been challenged by a number of empirical studies which have found the beta coefficient to be unstable over time. Examples of such empirical investigations are those documented by Blume [4], Levy [12], Levitz [11], Baesel [2], Altman, Jacquillat, and Levasseur [1], and Roenfelt, Griepentrong, and Pflaum [16]. Most recently, Fabozzi and Francis [9] reported that some security beta coefficients tend to be random over time. Their findings also support the regression tendency of the beta coefficients towards the mean over time, as found by Blume [4]. Thus, because the beta coefficient is changing over time, the use of the ordinary least-squares (OLS) method in investment and portfolio analysis will yield an inefficient estimate of systematic risk. Furthermore, the OLS estimates of security and portfolio residual risks will be influenced by the variability of beta coefficient. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the variability of the beta coefficient and portfolio residual risk, and hence to provide a real picture of the process of portfolio diversification under the condition of beta nonstationarity. It is shown that the use of the OLS method to estimate security and portfolio residual risks will produce an incorrect conclusion that larger residual risks tend to be associated with higher variability in the beta coefficient.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 1981 , pp. 95 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Altman, E. I.; Jacquillat, B.; and Levasseur, M.. “Comparative Analysis of Risk Measures: France and the United States.” Journal of Finance (12 1974), pp. 1495–1571.Google Scholar
[2]Baesel, Jerome B. “On the Assessment of Risk: Some Further Considerations.” Journal of Finance (12 1974), pp. 1491–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Belkaoui, A. “Canadian Evidence of Heteroskedasticity in the Market Model. Journal of Finance (09 1977), pp. 1320–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Blume, M. E. “On the Assessment of Risk.” Journal of Finance (03 1971) pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Brown, S. J. “Heteroskedasticity in the Market Model: A Comment.” Journal of Business, Vol. 50 (1977), pp. 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Chen, S. N., and Keown, A. J.. “An Examination of the Relationship between Pure and Market Risk.” Journal of Finance (1980) (subject to revision).Google Scholar
[7]Chen, S. N., and Lee, C. F.. “A Generalized Bayesian Approach to the Estimation and Forecasting of Time Varying Security Beta: A Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Investigation.” Working paper, Department of Finance, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (1980).Google Scholar
[8]Evans, J., and Archer, S.. “Diversification and the Reduction of Dispersion: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 23 (1968), pp. 761–767.Google Scholar
[9]Fabozzi, F. J., and Francis, J. C.. “Beta As a Random Coefficient.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (03 1978), pp. 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Klemkosky, R. C., and Martin, J. D.. “The Effect of Market Risk on Portfolio Diversification.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 30 (03 1975), pp. 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Levitz, G. D. “Market Risk and the Management of Institutional Equity Portfolios.” Financial Analysis Journal (01–02 1974), pp. 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Levy, Robert A. “Stationarity of Beta Coefficients.” Financial Analysis Journal (11–12 1971), pp. 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Lintner, J. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budget.” The Review of Economics and Statistics (02 1965).Google Scholar
[14]Miller, M. H., and Scholes, M.. “Rate of Return in Relation to Risk: A Reexamination of Some Recent Findings.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Market, Jensen, M. C., ed. New York: Praeger Publishers (1972).Google Scholar
[15]Mossin, J. “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market.” Econometrica, Vol. 34 (1966), pp. 768–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Roenfeldt, R. L.; Griepentrog, G. L.; and Pflaum, C. C.. “Further Evidence on the Stationarity of Beta Coefficients.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (03 1978), pp. 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Rogalski, R., and Vinso, J. D.. “Heteroskedasticity Security Return.” The Financial Review (Fall 1978), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
[18]Sharpe, W. F. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk.” Journal of Finance (09 1964).Google Scholar
[19]Theil, H.Principles of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1971).Google Scholar
[20]Theil, H., and Mennes, L. B. M.. “Conception Stochastique de Coefficients Multiplicateurs dans l'adjustement Linearire des Series Temporelles.” Publications del l'Institut de Statistique de l'Universite de Paris, Vol. 8 (1959), pp. 221–227.Google Scholar
[21]Vasicek, O. A. “A Note on Using Cross-Sectional Information in Bayesian Estimation of Security Beta.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 28 (1973), pp. 1233–1239.Google Scholar