Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:06:06.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Generalists Beneficial to Corporate Shareholders? Evidence from Exogenous Executive Turnovers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2018

André Betzer Open the ORCID record for André Betzer [Opens in a new window] ,
Hye Seung (Grace) Lee ,
Peter Limbach  and
Jesus M. Salas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study finds a positive, economically meaningful impact of generalist chief executive officers (CEOs) on shareholder value using 164 sudden deaths and 345 non-sudden exogenous turnovers. The higher a departing CEO’s general ability index (GAI), independently and relative to her successor, the lower is the abnormal stock return to turnover announcements. Returns reflect post-turnover changes in operating performance. Further, CEOs’ and successors’ GAIs are significantly positively related, but only for non-sudden turnovers. Consistently, for sudden deaths, we find positive stock returns to appointments of generalist successors. The results provide a market-based explanation for the generalist pay premium.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , March 2020 , pp. 581 - 619
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We thank an anonymous referee, Irem Demirci, Paul Malatesta (the editor), Daniel Metzger, Martin Ruckes, Markus Schmid, Meik Scholz-Daneshgari, Florian Sonnenburg, and Daniel Urban as well as seminar participants at Lehigh University, participants at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the German Finance Association in Leipzig, participants at the 2016 Conference of the Swiss Society for Financial Market Research in Zurich, and participants at the 2018 Annual Baruch-Fordham-Rutgers Accounting Conference for very helpful comments. We further thank Cláudia Custódio and Tim Quigley as well as Dirk Jenter, Florian Peters, and Alexander Wagner for graciously sharing data with us. Part of the paper was written while Limbach was with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.

References

Adams, R. B.; Almeida, H.; and Ferreira, D.. “Powerful CEOs and Their Impact on Corporate Performance.” Review of Financial Studies, 18 (2005), 1403–1432.Google Scholar
Adams, R. B.; Hermalin, B. E.; and Weisbach, M. S.. “The Role of Boards of Directors in Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Framework and Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature, 48 (2010), 58–107.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A.; Cremers, K. J. M.; and Peyer, U. C.. “The CEO Pay Slice.” Journal of Financial Economics, 102 (2011), 199–221.Google Scholar
Benmelech, E., and Frydman, C.. “Military CEOs.” Journal of Financial Economics, 117 (2015), 43–59.Google Scholar
Bennedsen, M.; Pérez-González, F.; and Wolfenzon, D.. “Do CEOs Matter: Evidence from CEO Hospitalization Events”. Journal of Finance, forthcoming (2017).Google Scholar
Bertrand, M.“CEOs.” Annual Review of Economics, 1 (2009), 121–149.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., and Schoar, A.. “Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (2003), 1169–1208.Google Scholar
Borokhovich, K. A.; Brunarski, K. L.; Donahue, M. S.; and Harman, Y. S.. “The Importance of Board Quality in the Event of a CEO Death.” Financial Review, 41 (2006), 307–337.Google Scholar
Borokhovich, K. A.; Parrino, R.; and Trapani, T.. “Outside Directors and CEO Selection.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (1996), 337–355.Google Scholar
Bhagat, S., and Bolton, B.. “Director Ownership, Governance, and Performance.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48 (2013), 105–135.Google Scholar
Carhart, M. M.“On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 57–82.Google Scholar
Chang, Y. Y.; Dasgupta, S.; and Hilary, G.. “CEO Ability, Pay, and Firm Performance.” Management Science, 56 (2010), 1633–1652.Google Scholar
Custódio, C.; Ferreira, M. A.; and Matos, P.. “Generalists Versus Specialists: Lifetime Work Experience and CEO Pay.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 471–492.Google Scholar
Custódio, C.; Ferreira, M. A.; and Matos, P.. “Do General Managerial Skills Spur Innovation?.” Management Science, 65 (2019), 459–476.Google Scholar
Custódio, C., and Metzger, D.. “How Do CEOs Matter? The Effect of Industry Expertise on Acquisition Returns.” Review of Financial Studies, 26 (2013), 2008–2047.Google Scholar
Custódio, C., and Metzger, D.. “Financial Expert CEOs: CEO’s Work Experience and Firm’s Financial Policies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 114 (2014), 125–154.Google Scholar
Dittmar, A., and Duchin, R.. “Looking in the Rearview Mirror: The Effect of Managers’ Professional Experience on Corporate Financial Policy.” Review of Financial Studies, 29 (2016), 565–602.Google Scholar
Eisfeldt, A. L., and Kuhnen, C. M.. “CEO Turnover in a Competitive Assignment Framework.” Journal of Financial Economics, 109 (2013), 351–372.Google Scholar
Falato, A.; Li, D.; and Milbourn, T.. “Which Skills Matter in the Market for CEOs? Evidence from Pay for CEO Credentials.” Management Science, 61 (2015), 2845–2869.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 3–56.Google Scholar
Ferreira, D., and Sah, R. K.. “Who Gets to the Top? Generalists versus Specialists in Managerial Organizations.” RAND Journal of Economics, 43 (2012), 577–601.Google Scholar
Frydman, C.“Rising Through the Ranks: The Evolution of the Market for Corporate Executives 1936–2003.” Management Science, forthcoming (2019).Google Scholar
Gabaix, X., and Landier, A.. “Why Has CEO Pay Increased So Much? ” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123 (2008), 49–100.Google Scholar
Garicano, L.“Hierarchies and the Organization of Knowledge in Production.” Journal of Political Economy, 108 (2000), 874–904.Google Scholar
Graham, J. R.; Li, S.; and Qiu, J.. “Managerial Attributes and Executive Compensation.” Review of Financial Studies, 25 (2012), 144–186.Google Scholar
Guadalupe, M.; Li, H.; and Wulf, J.. “Who Lives in the C-suite? Organizational Structure and the Division of Labor in Top Management.” Management Science, 60 (2014), 824–844.Google Scholar
Guay, W. R.; Taylor, D. J.; and Xiao, J. J.. “Adapt or Perish: Evidence of CEO Adaptability to Industry Shocks.” Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania (2015).Google Scholar
Jenter, D., and Kanaan, F.. “CEO Turnover and Relative Performance Evaluation.” Journal of Finance, 70 (2015), 2155–2184.Google Scholar
Jenter, D.; Matveyev, E.; and Roth, L.. “Good and Bad CEOs.” Working Paper, London School of Economics (2016).Google Scholar
Johnson, W. B.; Magee, R. P.; Nagarajan, N. J.; and Newman, H. A.. “An Analysis of the Stock Price Reaction to Sudden Executive Deaths: Implications for the Managerial Labor Market.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7 (1985), 151–174.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. N.; Klebanov, M. M.; and Sorensen, M.. “Which CEO Characteristics and Abilities Matter? ” Journal of Finance, 67 (2012), 973–1007.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. J., and Zabojnik, J.. “CEO Pay and Appointments: A Market-Based Explanation for Recent Trends.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 94 (2004), 192–196.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. J., and Zabojnik, J.. “Managerial Capital and the Market for CEOs.” Working Paper, University of Southern California (2007).Google Scholar
Nguyen, B. D., and Nielsen, K. M.. “What Death Can Tell: Are Executives Paid for Their Contributions to Firm Value? ” Management Science, 60 (2014), 2994–3010.Google Scholar
Peters, F. S., and Wagner, A. F.. “The Executive Turnover Risk Premium.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 1529–1563.Google Scholar
Quigley, T. J.; Crossland, C.; and Campbell, R. J.. “Shareholder Perceptions of the Changing Impact of CEOs: Market Reactions to Unexpected CEO Death 1950–2009.” Strategic Management Journal, 38 (2017), 939–949.Google Scholar
Rajan, R., and Wulf, J.. “The Flattening Firm: Evidence from Panel Data on the Changing Nature of Corporate Hierarchies.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 88 (2006), 759–773.Google Scholar
Salas, J. M.“Entrenchment, Governance, and the Stock Price Reaction to Sudden Executive Deaths.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 34 (2010), 656–666.Google Scholar
Schoar, A., and Zuo, L.. “Shaped by Booms and Busts: How the Economy Impacts CEO Careers and Management Style.” Review of Financial Studies, 30 (2017), 1425–1456.Google Scholar
Slovin, M. B., and Sushka, M. E.. “Ownership Concentration, Corporate Control Activity, and Firm Value: Evidence from the Death of Inside Blockholders.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 1293–1321.Google Scholar
Terviö, M.“The Difference that CEOs Make: An Assignment Model Approach.” American Economic Review, 98 (2008), 642–668.Google Scholar
Worrell, D. L.; Davidson, W. N.; Chandy, P. R.; and Garrison, S. L.. “Management Turnover through Deaths of Key Executives: Effects on Investor Wealth.” Academy of Management Journal, 29 (1986), 674–694.Google Scholar
Yonker, S. E.“Geography and the Market for CEOs.” Management Science, 63 (2017), 609–630.Google Scholar