Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:58:09.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Aggregation of Investor's Diverse Judgments and Preferences in Purely Competitive Security Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

John Lintner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The vector of equilibrium aggregate market values (or per share prices) of a given set of risk assets trading in purely competitive markets of individually risk-averse investors has been derived in earlier work under certain simplifying assumptions, including the absence of taxes and transactions costs and a single (uniform) holding period for the assessment of uncertain outcomes (See [8], [9], [10], [15], and [12]). The other critical assumptions in these studies were (a) the existence of a riskless asset available for holding or borrowing at a fixed, exogenously determined interest rate, (b) an assumption that all investors act in terms of identical joint probability distributions over end-of-period outcomes, and (c) the acceptance of a mean-variance criterion for portfolio decisions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 1969 , pp. 347 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Anderson, R. L., and Bancroft, T. A.. Statistical Theory in Research New York: McGraw-Hill, 1952.Google Scholar
[2]Arrow, Kenneth J.Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Yrjo Jahnssonin Säätio, Helsinki, 1965.Google Scholar
[3]Fama, Eugene F., “Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Some Clarifying Comments,“ Journal of Finance, March, 1968.Google Scholar
[4]Fama, Eugene F., “Risk, Return and Equilibrium in a Stable Paretian Market,” pp. 66 and 67 (mimeo., October 1967).Google Scholar
[5]Hakansson, N., “Risk Disposition, the Chauchy Equations, and the Separation Theorem,“ forthcoming in Econometrica.Google Scholar
[6]Jensen, Michael C., “Risk, the Pricing of Capital Assets and the Evaluation of Investment Portfolios,” Journal of Business, April 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Leland, Hayne Ellis. Dynamic Portfolio Theory. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University, May 1968.Google Scholar
[8]Lintner, John, “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets”, Review of Economics and Statistics, XLVII, February, 1965.Google Scholar
[9]Lintner, John, “Security Prices, Risk and Maximal Gains from Diversification,” Journal of Finance, December, 1965.Google Scholar
[10]Lintner, John, “The Market Price of Risk, Size of Market and Investor's Risk Aversion,” Review of Economics and Statistics, February, 1970.Google Scholar
[11]Lintner, John, “Equilibrium in a Lognormal Securities Market,”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,.forthcoming.Google Scholar
[12]Mossin, Jan, “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market,” Econometrica, October, 1966.Google Scholar
[13]Pratt, John, “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large”, Econometrica, Vol. 32, No. 1–2, January–April, 1964, pp. 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Raiffa, Howard, decision Analysis, Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty. Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley, 1968.Google Scholar
[15]Samuelson, Paul A., “General Proof that Diversification Pays,” The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, March, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Sharpe, William F., “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk,” Journal of Finance, September, 1964.Google Scholar
[17]Tobin, James, “Liquidity Preference as Behavior Toward Risk,” Review of Economic Studies, February, 1958.Google Scholar
[18]Wilson, Robert, “The Theory of Syndicates,“ Econometrica, Vol. 36, No. 1, January, 1968, pp. 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar