Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:54:53.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Scarcity Value of Treasury Collateral: Repo-Market Effects of Security-Specific Supply and Demand Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2018

Stefania D’Amico ,
Roger Fan  and
Yuriy Kitsul
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We quantify the scarcity value of Treasury collateral by estimating the impact of security-specific demand and supply factors on the specific collateral repurchase agreement (repo) rates of all outstanding U.S. Treasury securities. We find a positive and significant scarcity premium for on- and off-the-run Treasuries that persists for approximately 3 months and is larger in magnitude for shorter-term securities. This scarcity effect seems to pass through to Treasury cash market prices, providing additional evidence for the scarcity channel of quantitative easing (QE). On the contrary, the Federal Reserve’s reverse repo operations could help reduce the scarcity premium by alleviating potential shortages of high-quality collateral.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 53 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 2103 - 2129
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We are grateful to Gadi Barlevy, Hendrik Bessembinder (the editor), Michael Fleming, Francois Gourio, Frank Keane, Thomas King, Eric LeSueur, Dina Marchioni, Pamela Moulton (the referee), Sean Savage, John Sporn, Bin Wei, Toshiki Yotsuzuka, seminar and conference participants (2014 International Conference on Sovereign Bond Markets, 2014 European Finance Association (EFA) Conference, 2015 Federal Reserve System Day-Ahead Conference), the Monetary and Financial Analysis Division at the Bank of England, and the Market Operations Monitoring and Analysis (MOMA) group at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago for useful discussions and comments. We also thank Dominic Anene, Long Bui, Scott Konzem, and Tanya Perkins for their help with data preparation. All errors and omissions are our sole responsibility. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Reserve System, or their staff. This article was written while Fan was at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

References

Acharya, V. V., and Öncü, T. S.. “A Proposal for the Resolution of Systemically Important Assets and Liabilities: The Case of the Repo Market.” International Journal of Central Banking, 9 (2013), 291–349.Google Scholar
Adrian, T.; Begalle, B.; Copeland, A.; and Martin, A.. “Repo and Securities Lending.” Staff Report 529, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, available at http://www.nyfedeconomists.org/research/staff_reports/sr529.pdf (2011).Google Scholar
Baklanova, V.; Copeland, A.; and McCaughrin, R.. “Reference Guide to U.S. Repo and Securities Lending Markets.” Staff Report 740, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, available at https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr740.pdf (2015).Google Scholar
Banerjee, S., and Graveline, J. J.. “The Cost of Short-Selling Liquid Securities.” Journal of Finance, 68 (2013), 637–664.Google Scholar
Brandt, M. W., and Kavajecz, K. A.. “Price Discovery in the U.S. Treasury Market: The Impact of Orderflow and Liquidity on the Yield Curve.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 2623–2654.Google Scholar
Buraschi, A., and Menini, D.. “Liquidity Risk and Specialness.” Journal of Financial Economics, 64 (2002), 243–284.Google Scholar
Burne, K.“Pressure in Repo Market Spreads.” Wall Street Journal, http://www.wsj.com/articles/pressure-in-repo-market-spreads-1428013415 (2015).Google Scholar
Cahill, M. E.; D’Amico, S.; Li, C.; and Sears, J. S.. “Duration Risk versus Local Supply Channel in Treasury Yields: Evidence from the Federal Reserve’s Asset Purchase Announcements.” Working Paper 35, Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2013).Google Scholar
Carlson, M.; Duygan-Bump, B.; Natalucci, F.; Nelson, W. R.; Ochoa, M.; Stein, J.; and Van den Heuvel, S.. “The Demand for Short-Term, Safe Assets and Financial Stability: Some Evidence and Implications for Central Bank Policies.” International Journal of Central Banking, 12 (2016), 307–333.Google Scholar
Copeland, A.; Davis, I.; Lesueur, E.; and Martin, A.. “Lifting the Veil on the U.S. Bilateral Repo Market.” Available at http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2014/07/lifting-the-veil-on-the-us-bilateral-repo-market.html (2014).Google Scholar
Copeland, A.; Martin, A.; and Walker, M.. “Repo Runs: Evidence from the Tri-Party Repo Market.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 2343–2380.Google Scholar
D’Amico, S.; English, W.; López-Salido, D.; and Nelson, E.. “The Federal Reserve’s Large-Scale Asset Purchase Programmes: Rationale and Effects.” Economic Journal, 122 (2012), 415–446.Google Scholar
D’Amico, S., and King, T. B.. “Flow and Stock Effects of Large-Scale Treasury Purchases: Evidence on the Importance of Local Supply.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 425–448.Google Scholar
Duffie, D.“Special Repo Rates.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 493–526.Google Scholar
Duffie, D.; Gârleanu, N.; and Pedersen, L. H.. “Valuation in Over-the-Counter Markets.” Review of Financial Studies, 20 (2007), 1865–1900.Google Scholar
Fisher, M.“Special Repo Rates: An Introduction.” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 87 (2002), 27–43.Google Scholar
Fisher, S.“Financial Stability and Shadow Banks: What We Don’t Know Could Hurt Us.” At the 2015 Financial Stability Conference. Available at https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/fischer20151203a.htm (2015).Google Scholar
Fleming, M., and Keane, F.. “Characterizing the Rising Settlement Fails in Seasoned Treasury Securities.” Available at http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2016/01/characterizing-the-rising-settlement-fails-in-seasoned-treasury-securities.html (2016).Google Scholar
Fleming, M.; Keane, F.; Martin, A.; and McMorrow, M.. “What Explains the June Spike in Treasury Settlement Fails?” Available at http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2014/09/what-explains-the-june-spike-in-treasury-settlement-fails.html (2014).Google Scholar
Fleming, M. J., and Garbade, K. D.. “The Repurchase Agreement Refined: GCF Repo.” Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 9 (2003).Google Scholar
Fleming, M. J., and Garbade, K. D.. “Dealer Behavior in the Specials Market for US Treasury Securities.” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16 (2007), 204–228.Google Scholar
Fleming, M. J.; Krishnan, N.; and Reed, A. V.. “The Effects of Treasury Fails Charge on Market Functioning.” Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (2012).Google Scholar
Fontaine, J.-S., and Garcia, R.. “Bond Liquidity Premia.” Review of Financial Studies, 25 (2012), 1207–1254.Google Scholar
Garbade, K. D.; Keane, F. M.; Logan, L.; Stokes, A.; and Wolgemuth, J.. “The Introduction of the TMPG Fails Charge for U.S. Treasury Securities.” Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Oct. 2010), 45–71.Google Scholar
Goldreich, D.; Hanke, B.; and Nath, P.. “The Price of Future Liquidity: Time-Varying Liquidity in the U.S. Treasury Market.” Review of Finance, 9 (2005), 1–32.Google Scholar
Gorton, G.; Lewellen, S.; and Metrick, A.. “The Safe-Asset Share.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 102 (2012), 101–106.Google Scholar
Gorton, G., and Metrick, A.. “Securitized Banking and the Run on Repo.” Journal of Financial Economics, 104 (2012), 425–451.Google Scholar
Graveline, J. J., and McBrady, M. R.. “Who Makes On-the-Run Treasuries Special?” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 20 (2011), 620–632.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R.“Short- and Long-Term Demand Curves for Stocks: Theory and Evidence on the Dynamics of Arbitrage.” Journal of Financial Economics, 75 (2005), 607–649.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R.; Hanson, S. G.; Rudolph, J.; and Summers, L.. “Government Debt Management at the Zero Lower Bound.” Working Paper 5, Hutchins Center, available at http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2014/09/30-government-debt-management-zero-lower-bound (2014).Google Scholar
Greenwood, R.; Hanson, S. G.; and Stein, J. C.. “A Comparative-Advantage Approach to Government Debt Maturity.” Journal of Finance, 70 (2015), 1683–1722.Google Scholar
Gromb, D., and Vayanos, D.. “Limits of Arbitrage: The State of the Theory.” Working Paper 15821, National Bureau of Economic Research, available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w15821 (2010).Google Scholar
Jordan, B. D., and Jordan, S. D.. “Special Repo Rates: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 2051–2072.Google Scholar
Kaul, A.; Mehrotra, V.; and Morck, R.. “Demand Curves for Stocks Do Slope Down: New Evidence from an Index Weights Adjustment.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 893–912.Google Scholar
Keane, F.“Expected Repo Specialness Costs and the Treasury Auction Cycle.” Research Paper 9504, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, available at http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/research_papers/9504.pdf (1995).Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, A.“The Bond/Old-Bond Spread.” Journal of Financial Economics, 66 (2002), 463–506.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, A., and Vissing-Jorgensen, A.. “The Effects of Quantitative Easing on Interest Rates: Channels and Implications for Policy.” Working Paper 17555, National Bureau of Economic Research, available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w17555 (2011).Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, A., and Vissing-Jorgensen, A.. “The Impact of Treasury Supply on Financial Sector Lending and Stability.” Journal of Financial Economics, 118 (2015), 571–600.Google Scholar
Lou, D.; Yan, H.; and Zhang, J.. “Anticipated and Repeated Shocks in Liquid Markets.” Review of Financial Studies, 26 (2013), 1891–1912.Google Scholar
Martin, A.; McAndrews, J.; Palida, A.; and Skeie, D.. “Federal Reserve Tools for Managing Rates and Reserves.” Staff Report 642, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, available at http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr642.pdf (2013).Google Scholar
Moulton, P. C.“Relative Repo Specialness in U.S. Treasuries.” Journal of Fixed Income, 14 (2004), 40–47.Google Scholar
Musto, D. K.; Nini, G.; and Schwarz, K.. “Notes on Bonds: Liquidity at All Costs in the Great Recession.” Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania (2011).Google Scholar
Potter, S.“Recent Developments in Monetary Policy Implementation.” Speech delivered before the Money Marketeers of New York University, available at http://www.newyorkfed.org/newsevents/speeches/2013/pot131202.html (2013).Google Scholar
Shleifer, A.“Do Demand Curves for Stocks Slope Down?” Journal of Finance, 41 (1986), 579–590.Google Scholar
Singh, M. Collateral and Financial Plumbing. London, UK: Risk Books (2014).Google Scholar
Sunderam, A.“Money Creation and the Shadow Banking System.” Review of Financial Studies, 28 (2015), 939–977.Google Scholar
Svensson, L. E.“Estimating and Interpreting Forward Interest Rates: Sweden 1992–1994.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 4871 (1994).Google Scholar
Tabb, A.“Optimizing Collateral: In Search of a Margin Oasis.” Tabb Group Vision Note (2012).Google Scholar
Vayanos, D., and Weill, P.-O.. “A Search-Based Theory of the On-the-Run Phenomenon.” Journal of Finance, 63 (2008), 1361–1398.Google Scholar
Wurgler, J., and Zhuravskaya, E.. “Does Arbitrage Flatten Demand Curves for Stocks?” Journal of Business, 75 (2002), 583–608.Google Scholar
Yellen, J.“Regulatory Landscapes: A U.S. Perspective.” At the 2013 International Monetary Conference. Available at https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/yellen20130602a.htm (2013).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

D’Amico et al. supplementary material

D’Amico et al. supplementary material 1

Download D’Amico et al. supplementary material(File)
File 74.9 KB