Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:54:57.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peer Monitoring, Syndication, and the Dynamics of Venture Capital Interactions: Theory and Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2019

Onur Bayar ,
Thomas J. Chemmanur Open the ORCID record for Thomas J. Chemmanur [Opens in a new window]  and
Xuan Tian
Onur Bayar
Affiliation:
Bayar, [email protected], University of Texas at San Antonio College of Business
Thomas J. Chemmanur*
Affiliation:
Chemmanur, [email protected], Boston College Carroll School of Management
Xuan Tian*
Affiliation:
Tian, [email protected], Tsinghua University PBC School of Finance
*
Chemmanur (corresponding author), [email protected]
Tian (corresponding author), [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We develop a theoretical model providing a new rationale for venture capitalist (VC) syndicate formation and empirically test our model predictions. An entrepreneur obtains financing and two different value-adding inputs from a single VC or from two different VCs, each operating in his area of expertise. We characterize the entrepreneur’s equilibrium choice between contracting with a single VC, individually with multiple VCs, or with a VC syndicate. We show that syndicates mitigate VCs’ moral hazard problem in value addition. We also analyze the dynamics of VC syndicate composition. The results of our empirical analysis are consistent with our model’s predictions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 55 , Issue 6 , September 2020 , pp. 1875 - 1914
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For helpful comments and discussions, we thank Paolo Fulghieri, Jarrad Harford (the editor), Shan He, Gang Hu, Yawen Jiao, Karthik Krishnan, Elena Loutskina, Debarshi Nandy, S. Abraham Ravid (the referee), Karen Simonyan, and Chris Yung. We also thank seminar participants at Boston College, Essex University, and Indiana University, as well as conference participants at the Kauffman-RFS Entrepreneurial Finance and Innovation Conference at Boston and the Financial Management Association Meetings. We remain responsible for all errors and omissions. Chemmanur acknowledges funding from a Hillenbrand Distinguished Fellowship. Tian acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71825002, 71790591, and 91746301) and Tsinghua University (Research Grant No. 20151080451). An earlier version of this article was circulated under the title “Peer Monitoring, Syndication, and the Dynamics of Venture Capitalist Interactions.”

References

Aghion, P., and Bolton, P.. “An Incomplete Contracts Approach to Financial Contracting.” Review of Economic Studies, 59 (1992), 473–494.Google Scholar
Aghion, B., and Gollier, C.. “Peer Group Formation in an Adverse Selection Model.” Economic Journal, 110 (2000), 632–643.Google Scholar
Alchian, A., and Demsetz, H.. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review, 62 (1972), 777–795.Google Scholar
Anand, G.The Cure: How a Father Raised $100 Million-and Bucked the Medical Establishment-in a Quest to Save His Children. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers (2009).Google Scholar
Atanasov, V.; Ivanov, V.; and Litvak, K.. “Does Reputation Limit Opportunistic Behavior in the VC Industry? Evidence from Litigation against VCs.” Journal of Finance, 67 (2012), 2215–2246.Google Scholar
Bayar, O., and Chemmanur, T. J.. “IPOs versus Acquisitions and the Valuation Premium Puzzle: A Theory of Exit Choice by Entrepreneurs and Venture Capitalists.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46 (2011), 1755–1793.Google Scholar
Bayar, O., and Chemmanur, T. J.. “What Drives the Valuation Premium in IPOs versus Acquisitions? An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 18 (2012), 451–475.Google Scholar
Brander, J.; Amit, R.; and Antweiler, W.. “Venture Capital Syndication: Improved Venture Selection vs. Value-Added Hypothesis.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 11 (2002), 422–452.Google Scholar
Casamatta, C.“Financing and Advising: Optimal Financial Contracts with Venture Capitalists.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 2059–2085.Google Scholar
Casamatta, C., and Haritchabalet, C.. “Learning and Syndication in Venture Capital Investment.” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16 (2007), 368–396.Google Scholar
Cestone, G.; Lerner, J.; and White, L.. “The Design of Syndicates in Venture Capital.” Working Paper, Harvard University (2006).Google Scholar
Chemmanur, T. J., and Chen, Z.. “Venture Capitalists versus Angels: The Dynamics of Private Firm Financing Contracts.” Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 3 (2014), 39–86.Google Scholar
Chemmanur, T. J., and Fulghieri, P.. “Investment Bank Reputation, Information Production, and Financial Intermediation.” Journal of Finance, 49 (1994a), 57–79.Google Scholar
Chemmanur, T. J., and Fulghieri, P.. “Reputation, Renegotiation, and the Choice between Bank Loans and Publicly Traded Debt.” Review of Financial Studies, 7 (1994b), 475–506.Google Scholar
Chemmanur, T. J., and Fulghieri, P.. “A Theory of the Going Public Decision.” Review of Financial Studies, 12 (1999), 249–279.Google Scholar
Chemmanur, T. J.; Hull, T.; and Krishnan, K.. “Do Local and International Venture Capitalists Play Well Together? The Complementarity of Local and International Venture Capitalists.” Journal of Business Venturing, 31 (2016), 573–594.Google Scholar
Chemmanur, T. J.; Loutskina, E.; and Tian, X.. “Corporate Venture Capital, Value Creation, and Innovation.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 2434–2473.Google Scholar
Cho, I., and Kreps, D.. “Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102 (1987), 179–222.Google Scholar
Fudenberg, D., and Tirole, J.. “Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium and Sequential Equilibrium.” Journal of Economic Theory, 53 (1991), 1461–1489.Google Scholar
Ghatak, M., and Guinnane, T.. “The Economics of Lending with Joint Liability: Theory and Practice.” Journal of Development Economics, 60 (1999), 195–228.Google Scholar
Ghatak, M.“Screening by the Company You Keep: Joint Liability Lending and the Peer Selection Effect.” The Economic Journal, 110 (2000), 601–631.Google Scholar
Gompers, P.“Optimal Investments, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture Capital.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 1461–1489.Google Scholar
Gompers, P.; Kovner, A.; and Lerner, J.. “Specialization and Success: Evidence from Venture Capital.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18 (2009), 817–844.Google Scholar
Gompers, P., and Lerner, J.. “What Drives Venture Capital Fundraising? ” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, (1998), 139–192.Google Scholar
Grossman, S., and Hart, O.. “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration.” Journal of Political Economy, 94 (1986), 691–719.Google Scholar
Hart, O., and Moore, J.. “Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy, 98 (1990), 1119–1158.Google Scholar
Hochberg, Y.; Ljungqvist, A.; and Lu, Y.. “Whom You Know Matters: Venture Capital Networks and Investment Performance.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 251–301.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B.“Moral Hazard in Teams.” Bell Journal of Economics, 13 (1982), 324–340.Google Scholar
Kacperczyk, M.; Sialm, C.; and Zheng, L.. “On the Industry Concentration of Actively Managed Equity Mutual Funds.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 1983–2011.Google Scholar
Laffont, J.“Collusion and Group Lending with Adverse Selection.” Journal of Development Economics, 70 (2003), 329–348.Google Scholar
Laffont, J., and N’Guessan, T.. “Group Lending with Adverse Selection.” European Economic Review, 44 (2000), 773–784.Google Scholar
Lockett, A., and Wright, M.. “The Syndication of Private Equity: Evidence from the UK.” Venture Capital, 1 (1999), 303–324.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P., and Roberts, J.. “Price and Advertising Signals of Product Quality.” Journal of Political Economy, 94 (1986), 796–821.Google Scholar
Palia, D.; Ravid, A.; and Reisel, N.. “Choosing to Cofinance: Analysis of Project-Specific Alliances in the Movie Industry.” Review of Financial Studies, 21 (2008), 483–511.Google Scholar
Pichler, P., and Wilhelm, W.. “A Theory of the Syndicate: Form Follows Function.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 2237–2264.Google Scholar
Ravid, A., and Spiegel, M.. “Optimal Financial Contracts for a Start-Up with Unlimited Operating Discretion.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 32 (1997), 269–286.Google Scholar
Robinson, D.“Strategic Alliances and the Boundaries of the Firm.” Review of Financial Studies, 21 (2008), 649–681.Google Scholar
Sahlman, W.“The Structure and Governance of Venture Capital Organizations.” Journal of Financial Economics, 27 (1990), 473–521.Google Scholar
Spiegel, M., and Tookes, H.. “Dynamic Competition, Innovation, and Strategic Financing.” Working Paper, Yale University (2007).Google Scholar
Stock, J., and Yogo, M.. “Testing for Weak Instruments in IV Regression.” In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, Andrews, D. W. K. and Stock, J. H., eds. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press (2005), 80–108.Google Scholar
Tian, X.“The Causes and Consequences of Venture Capital Stage Financing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 101 (2011), 132–159.Google Scholar
Tian, X.; Udell, G.; and Yu, X.. “Disciplining Delegated Monitors: When Venture Capitalists Fail to Prevent Fraud by Their IPO Firms.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61 (2016), 526–544.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.“The Theory of Syndicates.” Econometrica, 36 (1968), 110–132.Google Scholar