Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:04:12.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Production Technology on Risk and the Cost of Capital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Laurence Booth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper uses a time-state-preference valuation model to examine how the firm's choice of technology and production method affects its equilibrium level of risk and, as a result, the firm's cost of capital. A fixed and flexible method of production is analyzed for a firm using a Cobb-Douglas production function. In both cases, it is found that risk and the cost of capital decrease with the level of capital intensity. Implications are drawn for the specification of empirical tests of the determinants of risk.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 109 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Booth, L. D. “Stochastic Demand, Output and the Cost of Capital: A Clarification.” Journal of Finance, 35 (06 1980), 795–799.Google Scholar
Booth, L. D. “Market Structure, Uncertainty and the Cost of Equity Capital.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 5 (12 1981), 467–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, L. D.. “Total Price Uncertainty and the Theory of the Competitive Firm.” Economica, 50 (05 1983), 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, L. D.. “On the Relationship between Time State Preference and Capital Asset Pricing Models.” Financial Review, 19 (05 1984), 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brealy, R.; Myers, S.; Sick, G.; and Whaley, R.. Principles of Corporate Finance (1st Canadian Edition). Toronto: McGraw Hill Ryerson (1986).Google Scholar
Brigham, E.; Kahl, A.; and Rentz, W.. Canadian Financial Management (2nd edition). Toronto: Holt Reinhart and Winston, Canada Ltd. (1987).Google Scholar
Fama, E. “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy, 88 (04 1980), 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and Miller, M.. Theory and Finance, Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press (1972).Google Scholar
Ferguson, C., and Savings, T.. “Long Run Scale Adjustments of a Perfectly Competitive Firm and Industry.” American Economic-Review, 59 (12 1969), 774–783.Google Scholar
Gahlon, J., and Gentry, J.. “On the Relationship between Systematic Risk and the Degrees of Operating and Financial Leverage.” Financial Management, 11 (Summer 1982), 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirshleifer, J.Investment Interest and Capital. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall (1970).Google Scholar
Layard, P., and Walters, A.. Microeconomic Theory. New York: McGraw Hill (1978).Google Scholar
Lev, B. “On the Association between Leverage and Risk.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 9 (09 1974), 627–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M., and Racette, G.. “Stochastic Demand, Output and the Cost of Capital.” Journal of Finance, 29 (05 1974), 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelker, G., and Rhee, S.. “The Impact of the Degrees of Operating and Financial Leverage on Systematic Risk of Common Stock.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 19 (03 1984), 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadiri, M. “Producers Theory.” In Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Arrow, K. and Intriligator, M., eds. Amsterdam: North Holland (1982).Google Scholar
Rubinstein, M. “A Mean Variance Synthesis of Corporate Financial Theory.” Journal of Finance, 28 (03 1973), 167–182.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, M. “The Valuation of Uncertain Income Streams and the Pricing of Options.” Bell Journal of Economics, 7 (Autumn 1976), 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subrahmanyam, M., and Thomadakis, S.. “Systematic Risk and the Theory of the Firm.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94 (05 1980), 437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomadakis, S. “A Model of Market Power, Valuation and the Firm's Return.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 7 (Spring 1976), 150–162, Table 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar