Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:12:12.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implications of Nonlinear Dynamics for Financial Risk Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that when log price changes are not IID, their conditional density may be more accurate than their unconditional density for describing short-term behavior. Using the BDS test of independence and identical distribution, daily log price changes in four currency futures contracts are found to be not IID. While there appear to be no predictable conditional mean changes, conditional variances are predictable, and can be described by an autoregressive volatility model that seems to capture all the departures from independence and identical distribution. Based on this model, daily log price changes are decomposed into a predictable part, which is described parametrically by the autoregressive volatility model, and an unpredictable part, which can be modeled by an empirical density, either parametrically or nonparametrically. This two-step seminonparametric method yields a conditional density for daily log price changes, which has a number of uses in financial risk management.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berndt, E. K.; Hall, B. H.; Hall, R. E.; and Hausman, J. A.. “Estimation and Inference in Nonlinear Structural Models.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 4 (1974), 653665.Google Scholar
Blattberg, R. C., and Gonedes, N.. “A Comparison of the Stable Paretian and Student Distribution as Statistical Model for Prices.” Journal of Business, 47 (1974), 244280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollerslev, T.Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity.” Journal of Econometrics, 31 (1986), 307327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollerslev, T.; Chow, R.; and Kroner, K.. “ARCH Modeling in Finance: A Review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence.” Working Paper No. 97, Dept. of Finance, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern Univ. (1990).Google Scholar
Bollerslev, T., and Wooldridge, J.. “Quasi Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Dynamic Models with Time Varying Covariances.” Unpubl. Manuscript, Dept. of Economics, MIT (1989).Google Scholar
Boothe, P., and Glassman, D.. “The Statistical Distribution of Exchange Rates: Empirical Evidence and Economic Implications.” Journal of International Economics, 22 (1987), 297319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, W.; Dechert, W.; and Scheinkman, J.. “A Test for Independence Based on the Correlation Dimension.” Working Paper, Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Univ. of Houston, and Univ. of Chicago (1987).Google Scholar
Brock, W.; Hsieh, D.; and LeBaron, B.. Nonlinear Dynamics, Chaos, and Instability: Statistical Theory and Economic Evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1991).Google Scholar
Clark, P. K.A Subordinated Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Prices.” Econometrica, 41 (1973), 135155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, W. S., and Devlin, S. J.. “Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83 (1988), 596610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, B., and Reinganum, M.. “Forward and Futures Prices: Evidence from the Foreign Exchange Markets.” Journal of Finance, 36 (1981), 10351046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J., and Ross, S.. “A Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), 145166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dechert, W.A Characterization of Independence for a Gaussian Process in Terms of the Correlation Dimension.” SSRI Working Paper 8812, Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison (1988).Google Scholar
Diebold, F., and Nason, J.. “Nonparametric Exchange Rate Prediction?Journal of International Economics, 28 (1990), 315332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B.The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R.Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of U. K. Inflations.” Econometrica, 50 (1982), 9871007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E.The Behavior of Stock Market Prices.” Journal of Business, 38 (1965), 34105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallant, R.; Hsieh, D.; and Tauchen, G.. “On Fitting a Recalcitrant Series: The Pound/Dollar Exchange Rate. 1974–83.” In Nonparametric and Semiparametric Methods in Econometrics and Statistics, Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium in Economic Theory and Econometrics, W. A..Google Scholar
Powell, Barnett J., and Tauchen, G., eds. Cambridge, England: Cambridge Univ. Press (1991).Google Scholar
Harvey, C.Commentary on Tests of Unbiasedness in the Foreign Exchange Futures Markets: The Effects of Price Limits.” Review of Futures Markets, 7 (1988), 167171.Google Scholar
Hodrick, R., and Srivastava, S.. “Foreign Currency Futures.” Journal of International Economics, 22 (1987), 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, D.Statistical Properties of Daily Exchange Rates.” Journal of International Economics, 24 (1988), 129145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, D.Testing for Nonlinearity in Daily Foreign Exchange Rate Changes.” Journal of Business, 62 (1989), 339368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, D.Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics: Application to Financial Markets.” Journal of Finance, 46 (1991), 18391877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, D., and LeBaron, B.. “Finite Sample Properties of the BDS Statistic.” Unpubl. Manuscript, Univ. of Chicago and Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison (1988).Google Scholar
Kodres, L.Tests of Unbiasedness in the Foreign Exchange Futures Markets: The Effects of Price Limits.” Review of Futures Markets, 7 (1988), 139166.Google Scholar
Kupiec, P. “Futures Margins and Stock Price Volatility: Is There Any Link?” Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Finance and Economics Discussion Paper No. 104 (1990).Google Scholar
LeBaron, B.The Changing Structure of Stock Returns.” Working Paper, Univ. of Wisconsin (1988).Google Scholar
McCurdy, T. H., and Morgan, I. G.. “Tests of the Martingale Hypothesis for Foreign Currency Futures.” International Journal of Forecasting, 3 (1987), 131148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meese, R., and Rose, A.. “Nonlinear, Nonparametric, Nonessential Exchange Rate Estimation.” American Economic Review, 80 (1990), 192196.Google Scholar
Nelson, D.ARCH Models as Diffusion Approximations.” Journal of Econometrics, 45 (1990), 738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D.Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach.” Econometrica, 59 (1991), 347370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, M.The Extreme Value Method of Estimating the Variance of the Rate of Return.” Journal of Business, 53 (1980), 6165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pemberton, J., and Tong, H.. “A Note on the Distribution of Non-Linear Autoregressive Stochastic Models.” Journal of Time Series Analysis, 2 (1981), 4952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogalski, R., and Vinso, J.. “Empirical Properties of Foreign Exchange Rates.” Journal of International Business Studies, 9 (1978), 6979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, G.Estimating the Dimension of a Model.” Annals of Statistics, 6 (1978), 461464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheinkman, J., and LeBaron, B.. “Nonlinear Dynamics and Stock Returns.” Journal of Business, 62 (1989), 311337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, C. J.Consistent Nonparametric Regressions.” Annals of Statistics, 5 (1977), 595620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerfield, J.An Examination of Foreign Exchange Risk under Fixed and Floating Rate Regimes.” Journal of International Economics, 7 (1977), 181200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar