Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:03:58.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Compensating Balance Requirements on the Profitability of Borrowers and Lenders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

The rationality of compensating balance requirements has been widely debated in the literature and among participants in the market for loanable funds. Rationality in this context refers to a net gain in interest income for the lending bank in the transaction without, at the same time, an increase in interest cost to the borrowing firm; or, conversely, a decrease in interest expense to the borrower without, simultaneously, a decrease in income derived from interest on the transaction by the bank. The lack of consensus as to whether or not compensating balance requirements are rational is based on the absence of uniform assumptions regarding the imposition of these requirements as well as by their restrictive, if not unrealistic, nature. Thus, Davis and Guttentag [2] and Hodgman [9] come to the conclusion that compensating balance requirements (hereinafter also known as c.b.) are indeed rational. However, this conclusion is based on the assumption that the borrowing firm maintains voluntary demand deposits in the lending bank or in another bank (i.e., balances that the firm employs for transaction and/or precautionary purposes which do not serve to satisfy c.b. for any loan or service performed by either bank) and that these deposits are sufficient in quantity to meet c.b. On the other hand, Hellweg [8] finds the use of c.b. irrational inasmuch as he assumes a lack of voluntary balances in either bank. In between these two extremes, Gibson [7], Shapiro and Baxter [11], and Wrightsman [13] suggest that c.b. may either be rational or irrational depending on the proportion of these balances satisfied through the voluntary holdings of the borrowing firm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Baxter, Nevins D., and Shapiro, Harold T.. “Compensating-Balance Requirements: The Results of a Survey.The Journal of Finance (September 1964).Google Scholar
[2]Davis, Richard G., and Guttentag, Jack M.. “Are Compensating Balance Requirements Irrational?Journal of Finance (March 1962).Google Scholar
[3]Davis, Richard G.Compensating Balances.Monthly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (December 1961).Google Scholar
[4]Davis, Richard G.Balance Requirements and Deposit Competition.Journal of Political Economy (December 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Eyler, Jerry N.A Simplified Method of Loan Profitability Computation.Journal of Commercial Bank Lending (February 1971).Google Scholar
[6]Frost, Peter.Banking Services, Minimum Cash Balances, and the Firm's Demand for Money.Journal of Finance (December 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Gibson, William E.Compensating Balance Requirements.The National Banking Review (March 1965).Google Scholar
[8]Hellweg, Donald.Note on Compensating Balance Requirements.Journal of Finance (March 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Hodgman, Ronald R.The Deposit Relationship and Commercial Bank Investment Behavior.Review of Economics and Statistics (August 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Orr, Daniel. “A Note on the Uselessness of Transaction Demand Models.Journal of Finance (December 1974).Google Scholar
[11]Shapiro, Harold T., and Baxter, Nevins D.. “Compensating Balance Requirements: The Theory and Its Implications.Southern Economic Journal (January 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Stone, Bernell K.Cost of Bank Loans.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (December 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Wrightsman, Dwayne. “On the Rationality of Compensating Balance Requirements.Southern Economic Journal (January 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar