Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:20:48.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Better Institutions Mitigate Agency Problems? Evidence from Corporate Finance Choices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Mariassunta Giannetti
Mariassunta Giannetti
Affiliation:
[email protected], Department of Finance and SITE, Stockholm School of Economics, Sveavägen 65, Box 6501, S-113 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines how firm characteristics, legal rules, and financial development affect corporate finance decisions. In contrast to the existing literature, I use data on unlisted companies to show that institutions play an important role in determining the extent of agency problems. In particular, I find that in countries with good creditor protection, it is easier for firms investing in intangible assets to obtain loans. The protection of creditor rights is also important for ensuring access to long-term debt for firms operating in sectors with highly volatile returns. Ceteris paribus, firms are more leveraged in countries where the stock market is less developed. Unlisted firms appear more indebted than listed companies even after controlling for firm characteristics such as profitability, size, and the ability to provide collateral. Finally, institutions that favor creditor rights and ensure stricter enforcement not only are associated with higher leverage, but also with greater availability of long-term debt.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 185 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Referemces

Barclay, M. J., and Smith, C. W.. “The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 609–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boot, L.; Aivazian, V.; Demirgüç-Kunt, A.; and Maksimovic, V.. “Capital Structures in Developing Countries.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 87–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, W., and Mayer, C.. “Finance, Investment and Growth.” Journal of Financial Economics (forthcoming 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A., Demirguç-Kunt, and Maksimovic, V.. “Law, Finance and Firm Growth.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 2107–2137.Google Scholar
A., Demirguç-Kunt, and Maksimovic, V.. “Institutions, Financial Markets and Firms' Choice of Debt Maturity.” Journal of Financial Economics, 54 (1999), 295–336.Google Scholar
Diamond, D. W. “Monitoring and Reputation: The Choice between Bank Loans and Directly Placed Debt.” Journal of Political Economy, 99 (1991), 689–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fluck, Z.; Holtz-Eakin, D.; and Rosen, H. S.. “Where Does the Money Come From?” Mimeo, New York Univ. (1997).Google Scholar
Guiso, L.; Haliassos, M.; and Jappelli, T.. Household Portfolios. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (2001).Google Scholar
Harris, M., and Raviv, A.. “The Theory of Capital Structure.” Journal of Finance, 56 (1991), 297–355.Google Scholar
Hsiao, C.Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press (1986).Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C. “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 76 (1986), 323–329.Google Scholar
Kim, W. S., and Sorensen, E. H.. “Evidence on the Impact of the Agency Costs of Debt on Corporate Debt Policy.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21 (1986), 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, L.; Ofek, E.; and Stulz, R. M.. “Leverage, Investment and Firm Growth.” Journal of Financial Economics, 40 (1996), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. “Legal Determinants of External Finance.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1997), 1131–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. “Law and Finance.” Journal of Political Economy, 106 (1998), 1113–1155.Google Scholar
MacKie-Mason, J. K. “Do Taxes Affect Corporate Financing Decisions?” Journal of Finance, 45 (1990), 1471–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, C. “New Issues in Corporate Finance.” European Economic Review, 32 (1988), 1167–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S. C. “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (1977), 147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S. C., and Majluf, N. S.. “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms Have Information Investors Do Not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (1984), 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagano, M.; Panetta, F.; and Zingales, L.. “Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 27–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, Price. Corporate Taxes: A Worldwide Summary (various issues).Google Scholar
Rajan, R. G. “Insiders and Outsiders: The Choice between Informed and Arm's-Length Debt.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 1367–1400.Google Scholar
Rajan, R. G., and Zingales, L.. “What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 1421–1460.Google Scholar
Rajan, R. G., and Zingales, L.. “The Politics of Financial Development.” Unpubl. Paper, Univ. of Chicago (1999).Google Scholar
Titman, S., and Wessels, R.. “The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice.” Journal of Finance, 63 (1988), 1–19.Google Scholar