Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:15:04.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Daily Cash Forecasting and Seasonal Resolution: Alternative Models and Techniques for Using the Distribution Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Abstract

Daily cash forecasting generally requires some method to reflect day-of-month and day-of-week effects. It requires the resolution of multiple seasonals, a problem given scant treatment in the econometrics literature. This paper first presents multiplticative and mixed-effects specifications of day-of-month and day-of-week effects as alternatives to the additive specifications. Then, several important estimation issues pertinent to each specification are investigated, namely collinearity, holiday effects, length-of-month distortion, varying weekly-monthly pattern mix, and daily-monthly consistency.

The paper develops a broad class of distribution-based linear forecasting models in great generality similar to the way that Box and Jenkins [1] provide a broad class of time-series models that can be specialized via parameter selection (specification). In our case, parameter selection (specification) gives particular members of the linear class of distribution models. A particular version can be tested against an alternative specification via hypothesis tests on model parameters.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Box, E. P., and Jenkins, M.. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Revised edition. San Francisco: Holden-Day (1976).Google Scholar
[2]Daniel, C., and Wood, F. S.. Fitting Equations to Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons (1971).Google Scholar
[3]Draper, N. R., and Smith, H.. Applied Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons (1966).Google Scholar
[4]Furnwal, G. M., and Wilson, R. W. M. Jr, “Regression by Leaps and Bounds.” Technometrics, Vol. 16 (1974), pp. 499511.Google Scholar
[5]Hocking, R. R.The Analysis and Selection of Variables in Linear Regression.” Biometrics, Vol. 32 (1976), pp. 149.Google Scholar
[6]Little, D. C.Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus.” Management Science, Vol. 16 (04 1970), pp. B466 to B–485.Google Scholar
[7]Maier, S. F.; Robinson, D. W. and Weide, J. H. Vander. “A Short-Term Disbursement Forecasting Model.” Financial Management, Vol. 10 (Spring 1981), pp. 920.Google Scholar
[8]Montgomery, D. C., and Peck, E. A.. Introduction to Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons (1980).Google Scholar
[9]Rinne, H., and Wood, R. A.. “Daily Sales Measurement and Control.” Working Paper, Finance Department, Penn State University (11 1983).Google Scholar
[10]Sharpe, K. L., and Tweedy, D. L.. “Cash Forecasting: A New Approach at Boise Cascade.” Working Paper, Boise Cascade Corp. (1982).Google Scholar
[11]Stone, B. K.The Payments-Pattern Approach to the Forecasting and Control of Accounts Receivable.” Financial Management, Vol. 5 (Autumn 1976), pp. 6582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Stone, B. K., and Wood, R. A.. “Daily Cash Forecasting: A Simple Method for Implementing the Distribution Approach.” Financial Management, Vol. 6 (Fall 1977), pp. 4050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Stone, B. K., and Miller, T. W.. “Daily Cash Forecasting: A Structuring Framework.” Journal of Cash Management, Vol. 1 (10 1981), pp. 3550.Google Scholar
[14]Theil, H.Principles of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1971).Google Scholar
[15]Thompson, M. L.Selection of Variables in Multiple Regression: Part I. A Review and Evaluation.” International Statistical Review, Vol. 46 (1978), pp. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Thompson, M. L.Selection of Variables in Multiple Regression: Part II. Chosen Procedures, Computations and Examples.” International Statistical Review, Vol. 46 (1978), pp. 129146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar