Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T12:18:24.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative Performance of the Black-Scholes and Roll-Geske-Whaley Option Pricing Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Extract

The original Black-Scholes (BS) [2] European call option pricing model does not take account of divided payments on the underlying stock and does not allow for the possibility of early exercise that may be optimal when the stock pays dividends. Black [1] has suggested that the original BS model can be modified to take account of dividends and Sharpe [14] predicts that this modified or pseudo-American BS approach, “while not exact, is probably sufficient for many listed options.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Black, F.Fact and Fantasy in the Use of Options.” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 31 (07/08 1975), pp. 3672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Black, F., and Scholes, M.. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81 (05/06 1973), pp. 637659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Galai, D.Tests of Market Efficiency of the Chicago Board Options Exchange.” The Journal of Business, Vol. 50 (04 1977), pp. 167197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Gatto, M.; Geske, R.; Litzenberger, R.; and Sosin, H.. “Mutual Fund Insurance.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 8 (09 1980), pp. 283317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Geske, R.The Pricing of Options with Stochastic Dividend Yield.” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 33 (05 1978), pp. 617625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Geske, R.The Valuation of Compound Options.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 7 (03 1979), pp. 6381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Geske, R.A Note on an Analytical Valuation Formula for Unprotected American Call Options on Stocks with Known Dividends.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 7 (12 1979), pp. 375380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Geske, R., and Shastri, K.. “Valuation by Approximation.” Unpublished working paper, University of California, Los Angeles (1982).Google Scholar
[9]Macbeth, J., and Merville, L. J.. “An Empirical Examination of the Black-Scholes Call Option Pricing Model.” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 34 (12 1979), pp. 11731186.Google Scholar
[10]Macbeth, J., and Merville, L. J.. “Tests of the Black-Scholes and Cox Call Option Valuation Models.” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 35 (05 1980), pp. 285301.Google Scholar
[11]Merton, R. C.The Theory of Rational Option Pricing.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 4 (Spring 1973), pp. 141183.Google Scholar
[12]Roll, R.An Analytic Valuation Formula for Unprotected American Call Options on Stocks with Known Dividends.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 5 (11 1977), pp. 251258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Rubinstein, M.The Valuation of Uncertain Income Streams and the Pricing of Options.” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 7 (Autumn 1976), pp. 407425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Sharpe, W. F.Investments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (1978), p. 383.Google Scholar
[15]Sterk, W. “Tests of Two Models for Valuing Call Options on Stocks with Dividends.” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 38 (12 1982), pp. 12291237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Whaley, R. W.On the Valuation of American Call Options on Stocks with Known Dividends.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 9 (06 1981), pp. 207211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Whaley, R. W.Valuation of American Call Options on Dividend-Paying Stocks—Empirical Tests.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 10 (03 1982), pp. 2958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Wonnacott, R. J., and Wonnacott, T. H.. Introductory Statistics for Business and Economics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1976).Google Scholar