Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:54:44.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comment: The Corporate Dividend-Saving Decision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

The dividend decision is a residual corporate decision and yet it is not a residual corporate decision. This theme runs through Professor Higgins' paper. It is based on the one hand on Higgins' belief that other decisions are more important and should take precedence over the dividend decision, and on the other, that the dividend decision is a function of these more important decisions. If dividends were truly residual, they would be explained by the corporate budget identity. In the empirical analysis, however, dividends are a function of other balance sheet decisions. In this sense the decision is neither active nor residual but passive. The reader wonders why the author insists on this role for dividends when interdependency in decision making is the more appealing (and inevitable) framework.

Type
Discussant
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Baumol, William J.The Stock Market and Economic Efficiency. New York, 1965.Google Scholar
[2]Brittain, John A.Corporate Dividend Policy. Washington, D.C., 1966.Google Scholar
[3]Dhrymes, P. J., and Kurz, M.. “Investment, Dividend and External Finance Behavior of Firms.” In Ferber, Robert, ed., Determinants of Investment Behavior, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
[4]Friedland, Seymour.The Economics of Corporate Finance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1966.Google Scholar
[5]Mao, James C. T.Quantitative Analysis of Financial Decisions. New York, 1969.Google Scholar
[6]Van Horne, James C.Financial Management and Policy, 2nd ed.Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1971.Google Scholar
[7]Vickers, Douglas. The Theory of the Firm: Production, Capital and Finance. New York, 1968.Google Scholar