Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T19:19:57.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Capital Allocation by Public and Private Firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2013

Sandra Mortal
Affiliation:
[email protected], Fogelman College of Business and Economics, University of Memphis, 3675 Central Ave, Memphis, TN 38152;
Natalia Reisel
Affiliation:
[email protected], Gabelli School of Business, Fordham University, 1790 Broadway, New York, NY 10019.

Abstract

We compare investment policies across public and private firms in different institutional settings. Using a large cross-country data set, we find that public listed firms are better positioned to take advantage of growth opportunities than private firms. Specifically, public listed firms exhibit higher investment sensitivity to growth opportunities than private firms. This differential, however, only exists in countries with well-developed stock markets. Furthermore, the relative advantage public firms have at allocating capital depends on the degree of agency costs and reliance on external equity.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, V. V.; Almeida, H.; and Campello, M.Is Cash Negative Debt? A Hedging Perspective on Corporate Financial Policies.” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16 (2007), 515554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akdoğu, E., and MacKay, P.Investment and Competition.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43 (2008), 299330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, H.; Campello, M.; and Weisbach, M.The Cash Flow Sensitivity of Cash.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 17771804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H.Asset Pricing and the Bid–Ask Spread.” Journal of Financial Economics, 17 (1986), 223249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asker, J.; Farre-Mensa, J.; and Ljungqvist, A.Does the Stock Market Harm Investment Incentives?” Working Paper, New York University (2010).Google Scholar
Aslan, H., and Kumar, P.Lemons or Cherries? Growth Opportunities and Market Temptations in Going Public and Private.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46 (2011), 489526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. “Business Behavior, Value, and Growth.” New York, NY: Macmillan (1959).Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A., and Stole, L.Do Short-Term Objectives Lead to Under- or Overinvestment in Long-Term Projects?Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 719729.Google Scholar
Bekaert, G.; Harvey, C.; and Lundblad, C.Does Financial Liberalization Spur Growth?Journal of Financial Economics, 77 (2005), 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekaert, G.; Harvey, C.; Lundblad, C.; and Siegel, S.Global Growth and Market Integration.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 10811137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berle, A., and Means, G.The Modern Corporation and Private Property.” New York, NY: Macmillan (1932).Google Scholar
Bharath, S., and Dittmar, A.Why Do Firms Use Private Equity to Opt Out of Public Markets?Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 17711818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billett, M. T.; King, T. D.; and Mauer, D. C.Growth Opportunities and the Choice of Leverage, Debt Maturity, and Covenants.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 697730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brau, J., and Fawcett, S.Initial Public Offerings: An Analysis of Theory and Practice.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 399436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgstahler, D. C.; Hail, L.; and Leuz, C.The Importance of Reporting Incentives: Earnings Management in European Private and Public Firms.” Accounting Review, 81 (2006), 9831016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, A., and Cornaggia, J.Does Access to External Finance Improve Productivity? Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Journal of Financial Economics, 99 (2011), 184203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campello, M., and Graham, J.Do Stock Prices Influence Corporate Decisions? Evidence from the Technology Bubble.” Journal of Financial Economics, 107 (2013), 89110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q.; Goldstein, I.; and Jiang, W.Price Informativeness and Investment Sensitivity to Stock Price.” Review of Financial Studies, 20 (2007), 619650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J.; Hassett, K.; and Oliner, S.Investment Behavior, Observable Expectations, and Internal Funds.” American Economic Review, 96 (2006), 796810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and Levine, R.Stock Market Development and Financial Intermediaries: Stylized Facts.” World Bank Economic Review, 10 (1996), 291321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H. “The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (1983), 375390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djankov, S.; La Porta, R.; López-de-Silanes, F.; and Shleifer, A.The Law and Economics of Self-Dealing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 88 (2008), 430465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, G. “Managing Corporate Wealth.” New York, NY: Praeger (1984).Google Scholar
Dow, J., and Gorton, G.Stock Market Efficiency and Economic Efficiency: Is There a Connection?Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 10871129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmans, A.Blockholder Trading, Market Efficiency, and Managerial Myopia.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 24812513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmans, A.; Goldstein, I.; and Jiang, W.The Real Effects of Financial Markets: The Impact of Prices on Takeovers.” Journal of Finance, 67 (2012), 933971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazzari, S. M.; Hubbard, R. G.; and Petersen, B. C.Financing Constraints, and Investment.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1 (1988), 141206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, R., and Love, I.Financial Development and Intersectoral Allocation: A New Approach.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 27852807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannetti, M. “Do Better Institutions Mitigate Agency Problem? Evidence from Corporate Finance Choices.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38 (2003), 185212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, N., and Yuan, K.On the Growth Effect of Stock Market Liberalizations.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 47154752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica, 47 (1979), 153161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmstrom, B., and Tirole, J.Market Liquidity and Performance Monitoring.” Journal of Political Economy, 101 (1993), 678709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, G. “Capital-Market Imperfections and Investment.” Journal of Economic Literature, 36 (1998), 193225.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. “Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers.” American Economic Review, 76 (1986), 323329.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. “Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 831880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M., and Meckling, W.Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), 305360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; López-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R.Legal Determinants of External Finance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 11311150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; López-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R.Law and Finance.” Journal of Political Economy, 106 (1998), 11131155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehn, K., and Poulsen, A.Free Cash Flow and Stockholder Gains in Going Private Transactions.” Journal of Finance, 44 (1989), 771787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, R.Finance and Growth: Theory and Evidence.” Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, I. “Financial Development and Financing Constraints: International Evidence from the Structural Investment Model.” Review of Financial Studies, 16 (2003), 765791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marris, R. The Economic Theory of “Managerial” Capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, K. “The Method of Payment in Corporate Acquisitions, Investment Opportunities, and Management Ownership.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 12271246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaely, R., and Roberts, M.Corporate Dividend Policies: Lessons from Private Firms.” Review of Financial Studies, 25 (2012), 711746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayanan, M. P. “Managerial Incentives for Short-Term Results.” Journal of Finance, 40 (1985), 14691484.Google Scholar
Rajan, R., and Zingales, L.Financial Dependence and Growth.” American Economic Review, 88 (1998), 559586.Google Scholar
Sheen, A.Do Public and Private Firms Behave Differently? An Examination of Investment in the Chemical Industry.” Working Paper, University of California at Los Angeles (2009).Google Scholar
Shin, H., and Stulz, R.Are Internal Capital Markets Efficient?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113 (1998), 531552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, J.Takeover Threats and Managerial Myopia.” Journal of Political Economy, 96 (1988), 6180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, J. “Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104 (1989), 655669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, J.Agency, Information and Corporate Investment.” Handbook of the Economics of Finance. Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier Science (2003).Google Scholar
Stoll, H. R., and Whaley, R. E.Transaction Costs and the Small Firm Effect.” Journal of Financial Economics, 12 (1983), 11531172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subrahmanyam, A., and Titman, S.The Going-Public Decision and the Development of Financial Markets.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 10451082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whited, T. “External Finance Constraints and the Intertemporal Pattern of Intermittent Investment.” Journal of Financial Economics, 81 (2006), 467502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. “The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm.” Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall (1964).Google Scholar
Wurgler, J. “Financial Markets and the Allocation of Capital.” Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (2000), 187214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Mortal Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Mortal Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 133.1 KB