Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:51:02.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Bias in Closing Prices: The Case of the When-Issued Pricing Anomaly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Raymond M. Brooks  and
Shur-Nuaan Chiou
Raymond M. Brooks
Affiliation:
Department of Finance, University of Missouri, 214 Middlebush Hall, Columbia, MO 65211
Shur-Nuaan Chiou
Affiliation:
Department of Finance, National Chung Cheng University, Ming-Hsiung, Chia-Yi, Taiwan, R.O.C. 621
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Financial studies examining stock price behavior have principally relied on end-of-day data. This paper illustrates a bias in closing prices by reexamining the when-issue pricing anomaly with intraday data. With intraday data, major portions of the pricing anomaly can be explained by: a nonsynchronous matching of trades; a difference in the settlement procedures (labeled time value of money in Choi and Strong (1983)); a mismatching of market purchases with market sales (first proposed by Lamoureux and Wansley (1989)); and a higher frequency of market purchases relative to market sales. In addition, the small remaining portion of the anomaly cannot be arbitraged. The remaining premium is attributed to a lower level of limit order competition and an order imbalance in the when-issued shares.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 441 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Choi, D. and Strong, R.. “The Pricing of When-Issued Common Stock: A Note.” Journal of Finance, 38 (09 1983), 1293–1298.Google Scholar
Cohen, K.; Hawawini, G.; Maier, S.; Schwartz, R.; and Whitcomb, D.. “Implications of Microstructure Theory for Empirical Research on Stock Price Behavior.” Journal of Finance, 35 (05 1980), 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, J., and Kaul, G.. “Long-Term Market Overreaction or Bias in Computed Returns.” Journal of Finance, 48 (03 1993), 39–64.Google Scholar
Conrad, J.; Kaul, G.; and Nimalendran, M.. “Components of Short-Horizon Individual Security Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 29 (10 1991), 365–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keim, D. “Trading Patterns, Bid-Ask Spreads, and Estimated Security Returns: The Case of Common Stocks at Calendar Turning Points.” Journal of Financial Economics, 25 (11 1989), 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
amoureux, C., and Wansley, J.. “The Pricing of When-Issued Securities.” Financial Review, 24 (05 1989), 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lease, R.; Masulis, R.; and Page, J.. “An Investigation of Market Microstructure Impacts on Event Study Returns.” Journal of Finance, 46 (12 1991), 1523–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, A., and MacKinlay, A.. “When are Contrarian Profits Due to Stock Market Overreaction?” Review of Financial Studies, 3 (2, 1991), 175–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McInish, T., and Wood, R.. “Hourly Returns, Volume, Trade Size and Number of Trades.” Journal of Financial Research, 14 (Winter 1991), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McInish, T., and Wood, R.. “An Analysis of Intraday Patterns in Bid-Ask Spreads for NYSE Stocks.” Journal of Finance, 47 (06 1992), 753–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatesh, P. “Empirical Evidence on the Impact of the Bid-Ask Spread and the Characteristics of CRSP Daily Returns.” Journal of Financial Research, 15 (Summer 1992), 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar