Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:24:56.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Empirical Examination of the Pricing of American Put Options

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Abstract

This study is an ex post performance test comparing the accuracy of an American model to a European model for valuing listed options. Specifically, the Geske and Johnson American put valuation model is compared with the Black and Scholes European put model. On average, both models undervalue, relative to market prices, put options. However, the Geske and Johnson model values are significantly closer to market prices than are the Black and Scholes values.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, F.Fact and Fantasy in the Use of Options.” Financial Analysts Journal, 31 (0708 1975), 3641,61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F., and Scholes, M.. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (05/06 1973), 637659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomeyer, E.An Analytic Approximation for the American Put Price for Options on Stocks with Dividends.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21 (06 1986), 229233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomeyer, E., and Klemkosky, R.. “Tests of Market Efficiency for American Call Options.” In Option Pricing Theory and Applications, Brenner, M., ed. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co., Lexington Books (1983), 101121.Google Scholar
Brennan, M., and Schwartz, E.. “The Valuation of American Put Options.” Journal of Finance, 32 (05 1977), 449462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J., and Rubinstein, M.. Options Markets. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall (1985).Google Scholar
Cox, J.; Ross, S.; and Rubinstein, M.. “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (10 1979), 229263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geske, R., and Johnson, H.. “The American Put Option Valued Analytically.” Journal of Finance, 39 (12 1984), 15111524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geske, R., and Shastri, K.. “The Early Exercise of American Puts.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 9 (06 1985a), 207219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geske, R.Valuation by Approximation: A Comparison of Alternative Option Valuation Techniques. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20 (03 1985b), 4571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H.An Analytic Approximation for the American Put Price.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 18 (03 1983), 141148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacBeth, J., and Merville, L.. “An Empirical Examination of the Black-Scholes Call Option Pricing Model.” Journal of Finance, 34 (12 1979), 11731186.Google Scholar
Merton, R.Option Pricing when Underlying Stock Returns are Discontinuous.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (0103 1976), 124144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omberg, E. “The Valuation of American Put Options with Exponential Exercise Policies.” Advances in Futures and Options Research, 1 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Parkinson, M.Option Pricing: The American Put.” Journal of Business, 50 (01 1977), 2336.Google Scholar
Parkinson, M.The Random Walk Problem: The Extreme Value Method for Estimating the Variance of the Displacement.’ Journal of Business, 53 (01 1980), 6165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roll, R.An Analytic Valuation Formula for Unprotected American Call Options on Stocks with Known Dividends.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (11 (1977), 251258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, M.Nonparametric Tests of Alternative Option Pricing Models Using all Reported Trades and Quotes on the 30 Most Active CBOE Option Classes from August 23, 1976 through August31, 1978.” Journal o)Finance, 40 (06 1985), 455480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shastri, K., and Titman, S.. “Market Efficiency with Costly Transactions: An Examination of the Chicago Board Options Exchange.” Manuscript, UCLA (1984).Google Scholar