Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:09:51.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Active Technological Similarity and Mutual Fund Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2021

Ping McLemore ,
Richard Sias Open the ORCID record for Richard Sias [Opens in a new window] ,
Chi Wan  and
H. Zafer Yüksel
Ping McLemore
Affiliation:
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond [email protected]
Richard Sias*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona Eller College of Management
Chi Wan
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Boston College of [email protected]
H. Zafer Yüksel
Affiliation:
University of Rhode Island, College of [email protected]
*
[email protected] (corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine whether superior understanding of technological innovation is a source of mutual fund managers’ ability to garner positive abnormal returns. Consistent with our hypothesis, the inter-quintile annual net Carhart alpha spread for mutual funds sorted on changes in the technological similarity (TS) of their portfolio holdings is 282 basis points. Moreover, because changes in TS are largely orthogonal to other predictors of mutual fund success (e.g., industry concentration, active share, fund R2, and lag fund alpha), changes in TS can be combined with other measures to help identify the best performing funds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 57 , Issue 5 , August 2022 , pp. 1862 - 1884
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors thank Hendrik Bessembinder (the editor), Ruslan Goyenko (the referee), and participants at the 2020 Financial Management Association Annual Meeting. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond or the Federal Reserve System. All errors are our own.

References

Amihud, Y., and Goyenko, R.. “Mutual Fund’s R 2 as Predictor of Performance.” Review of Financial Studies, 26 (2013), 667–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Goyenko, R.. “How to Measure the Skills of Your Fund Manager.” American Association of Individual Investors Journal, 37 (2015), 27–31.Google Scholar
Baker, M.; Litov, L.; Wachter, J. A.; and Wurgler, J.. “Can Mutual Fund Managers Pick Stocks? Evidence from Their Trades Prior to Earnings Announcements.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45 (2010), 1111–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekkerman, R.; Fich, E. M.; and Khimich, N.. “The Effect of Innovation Similarity on Asset Prices: Evidence from Patents’ Big Data.” Working Paper, Drexel University (2020).Google Scholar
Bloom, N.; Schankerman, M.; and Van Reenan, J.. “Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry.” Econometrica, 81 (2013), 1347–1393.Google Scholar
Brown, N. J., and Goetzmann, W. N.. “Performance Persistance.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 679–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carhart, M. “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Returns.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, L. K. C., and Lakonishok, J.. “Institutional Trades and Intraday Stock Price Behavior.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H. L.; Jegadeesh, N.; and Wermers, R.. “The Value of Active Mutual Fund Management: An Examination of the Stockholdings and Trades of Fund Managers.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35 (2000), 343–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cici, G.; Gehde-Trapp, M.; Goricke, M. A.; and Kempf, A.. “The Investment Value of Mutual Fund Managers’ Experience Outside the Financial Sector.” Review of Financial Studies, 31 (2018), 3821–3853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L.; Diether, K.; and Malloy, C.. “Misvaluing Innovation.” Review of Financial Studies, 26 (2013), 635–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L.; Frazzini, A.; and Malloy, C.. “The Small World of Investing: Board Connections and Mutual Fund Returns.” Journal of Political Economy, 116 (2008), 951–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coval, J. D., and Moskowitz, T. J.. “Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Preference in Domestic Portfolio.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 2045–2073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coval, J. D., and Moskowitz, T. J.. “The Geography of Investment: Informed Trading and Asset Prices.” Journal of Political Economy, 109 (2001), 811–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremers, K. J. M., and Petajisto, A.. “How Active Is Your Fund Manager? A New Measure that Predicts Performance.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 3329–3365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, K.; Grinblatt, M.; Titman, S.; and Wermers, R.. “Measuring Mutual Fund Performance with Characteristic-Based Benchmarks.” Journal of Finance, 52 (2012), 1035–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, Y.; Hotchkiss, E. S.; and Jiao, Y.. “Business Ties and Informational Advantage: Evidence from Mutual Fund Trading.” Contemporary Accounting Research, 35 (2018), 866–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, E. J.; Gruber, M. J.; and Blake, C. R.. “The Persistence of Risk-Adjusted Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Business, 69 (1996), 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. “Mutual Fund Incubation.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 1581–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagerberg, J., and Srholec, M.. “National Innovation Systems, Capabilities and Economic Development.” Research Policy, 37 (2008), 1417–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and MacBeth, J. D.. “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, M. J. “Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds.” Journal of Finance, 5 (1996), 783–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, F. “Innovation, Future Earnings, and Market Efficiency.” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 20 (2005), 385–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B. H.; Jaffe, A. B.; and Trajtenberg, M.. “The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools.” Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley (2001).Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, D.; Hsu, P. H.; and Li, D.. “Innovative Efficiency and Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 107 (2013), 632–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirshleifer, D.; Hsu, P. H.; and Li, D.. “Innovative Originality, Profitability, and Stock Returns.” Review of Financial Studies, 31 (2018), 2553–2605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, P. H. “Technological Innovations and Aggregate Risk Premiums.” Journal of Financial Economics, 94 (2009), 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, L., and Kale, J. R.. “Product Market Linkages, Manager Quality, and Mutual Fund Performance.” Review of Finance, 17 (2013), 1895–1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J.; Sialm, C.; and Zhang, H.. “Risk Shifting and Mutual Fund Performance.” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2011), 2575–2616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. B. “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits and Market Value.” Working Paper, Brandeis University (1986).Google Scholar
Kacperczyk, M., and Seru, A.. “Fund Manager Use of Public Information: New Evidence on Managerial Skills.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 485–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacperczyk, M.; Sialm, C.; and Zheng, L.. “On Industry Concentration of Actively Managed Equity Mutual Funds.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 1983–2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, L.; Papanikolaou, D.; Seru, A.; and Stoffman, N.. “Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132 (2017), 665–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kothari, S. P., and Warner, J. B.. “Evaluating Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 1985–2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. M. C.; Sun, S. T.; Wang, R.; and Zhang, R.. “Technological Links and Predictable Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 132 (2019), 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lintner, J. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 47 (1965), 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, D. “A Flow-Based Explanation for Return Predictability.” Review of Financial Studies, 25 (2012), 3457–3489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massa, M., and Rehman, Z.. “Information Flows Within Financial Conglomerates: Evidence from Banks–Mutual Funds Relation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 89 (2008), 288–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakes, A. “On Patents, R & D, and the Stock Market Rate of Return.” Journal of Political Economy, 93 (1985), 390–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakes, A., and Griliches, Z.. “Estimating Distributed Lags in Short Panels with an Application to the Specification of Depreciation Patterns and Capital Stock Constructs.” Review of Economic Studies, 51 (1984), 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petajisto, A. “Active Share and Mutual Fund Performance.” Financial Analysts Journal, 69 (2013), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puckett, A., and Yan, X.. “The Interim Trading Skills of Institutional Investors.” Journal of Finance, 66 (2011), 601–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, J., and Wan, C.. “Technology Spillovers and Corporate Cash Holdings.” Journal of Financial Economics, 115 (2015), 558–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, J.; Wang, J.; and Zhou, Y.. “Technology and Return Predictability.” Working Paper, McMaster University (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, W. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk.” Journal of Finance, 19 (1964), 425–442.Google Scholar
Shea, J. “What Do Technology Shocks Do?” NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 13 (1998), 275–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirri, E. R., and Tufano, P.. “Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 1589–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wermers, R. “Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock-Picking Talent, Style, Transactions Costs, and Expenses.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 1655–1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

McLemore et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download McLemore et al. supplementary material(File)
File 59.6 KB