Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:15:33.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The AB Procedure and Capital Budgeting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

William Beranek
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent paper the net present value (NPV) accept-reject decision rule, invoking the conventional definition of expected net cash flows of a finite, uneven character along with a weighted average cost of capital, was derived from the condition of shareholder wealth maximization (Beranek [2]). Since the entire textbook-NPV expression was established–its logical form, the content of its variables, and the implied specification of its parameters–this has served as a partial rescue of textbook approaches to capital budgeting, approaches which had heretofore rested on an intuitive basis. But attempts to rescue textbook treatments of mutually exclusive (ME) choices and capital rationing must fail. Explaining why they must fail, and developing what we shall denote as the AB alternative solution, is the object of this paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 391 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Beranek, W. “The Weighted Average Cost of Capital and Shareholder Wealth Maximization.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (03 1977), pp. 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Beranek, W.. “Some New Capital Budgeting Theorems.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (12 1978), pp. 17–31.Google Scholar
[3]Bernhard, R. H. “Some New Capital Budgeting Theorems: Comment.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (12 1978), pp. 825–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Brick, J. R. and Thompson, H. E.. “The Economic Life of an Investment and the Appropriate Discount Rate.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (12 1978), pp. 831–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Dantzig, G.Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press (1963), pp. 517–520.Google Scholar
[6]Fama, E. F. and Miller, M. H.. The Theory of Finance. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston (1972), pp. 181–184.Google Scholar
[7]Haley, C. W. and Schall, L. D.. “Problems with the Concept of the Cost of Capital.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (12 1978), pp. 847–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar