Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:10:44.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preferences for Domestic Action Over International Transfers in Global Climate Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2018

Mark T. Buntaine  and
Lauren Prather
Mark T. Buntaine
Affiliation:
Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, e-mail: [email protected]
Lauren Prather
Affiliation:
School of Global Policy & Strategy, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA, e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cost-effective and equitable climate change mitigation requires the transfer of resources from developed to developing countries. In two behavioral experiments, we demonstrate that American subjects act according to a strong home preference, by making private donations and writing letters in support of public spending more often for mitigation programs located at home versus those overseas. We attempt to overcome the preference to act at home by randomly informing some subjects that foreign programs are more cost-effective than domestic programs. Home preference is mitigated only in the case of private donations. From a separate experimental treatment, we show that the preference against foreign programs is exacerbated when the co-benefits of mitigation programs are made salient. Importantly, home preference crosses party lines, indicating that it is a deep-seeded, affective preference. These findings highlight significant political obstacles to international cooperation on climate change that relies on transfers.

Keywords

Climate changecost-effectivenessbehavioral experimentsglobal cooperationclimate aid
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , Summer 2018 , pp. 73 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldy, Joseph E. 2014. “The Crucial Role of Policy Surveillance in International Climate Policy.” Climatic Change 126 (3): 279–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldy, Joseph E. and Pizer, William A.. 2015. “Alternative Metrics for Comparing Domestic Climate Change Mitigation Efforts and the Emerging International Climate Policy Architecture.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 10 (1): 3–24.Google Scholar
Athey, S. and Imbens, G. W.. 2017. “The Econometrics of Randomized Experiments A.” In Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, ed. Banerjee, Abhijit Vinayak and Duflo, Esther. North-Holland, pp. 73–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Scott. 2008. “Climate Treaties and the Imperative of Enforcement.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24 (2): 239–58.Google Scholar
Barrett, Scott and Dannenberg, Astrid. 2012. “Climate Negotiations Under Scientific Uncertainty.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (43): 17372–76.Google Scholar
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., and Lenz, G. S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis: An Annual Publication of the Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association 20 (3): 351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosetti, Valentina, Valentina, Bosetti, Carlo, Carraro, and Massimo, Tavoni. 2009. “Climate Change Mitigation Strategies in Fast-Growing Countries: The Benefits of Early Action.” Energy Economics 31 (Suppl. 2): S144–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvin, Katherine, Katherine, Calvin, Pralit, Patel, Allen, Fawcett, Leon, Clarke, Karen, Fisher-Vanden, Jae, Edmonds, Kim, Son H., Ron, Sands, and Marshall, Wise. 2009. “The Distribution and Magnitude of Emissions Mitigation Costs in Climate Stabilization Under Less than Perfect International Cooperation: SGM Results.” Energy Economics 31 (Suppl. 2): S187–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheon, Andrew and Urpelainen, Johannes. 2013. “How Do Competing Interest Groups Influence Environmental Policy? The Case of Renewable Electricity in Industrialized Democracies, 1989–2007.” Political Studies 61 (4): 874–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diederich, Johannes and Goeschl, Timo. 2013. “Willingness to Pay for Voluntary Climate Action and Its Determinants: Field-Experimental Evidence.” Environmental & Resource Economics 57 (3): 405–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diederich, Johannes and Goeschl, Timo. 2017. Does Mitigation Begin at Home? Discussion Paper Series 634, University of Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Eckersley, Robyn. 2012. “Moving Forward in the Climate Negotiations: Multilateralism or Minilateralism?” Global Environmental Politics 12 (2): 24–42.Google Scholar
Elzen, Michel den, Paul, Lucas, and van Vuuren, Detlef. 2005. “Abatement Costs of Post-Kyoto Climate Regimes.” Energy Policy 33 (16): 2138–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flachsland, Christian, Marschinski, Robert, and Edenhofer, Ottmar. 2009. “Global Trading Versus Linking: Architectures for International Emissions Trading.” Energy Policy 37 (5): 1637–47.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H. and Kam, Cindy D.. 2007. “Beyond the Self: Social Identity, Altruism, and Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics 69 (3): 813–27.Google Scholar
Gampfer, Robert. 2014. “Do Individuals Care about Fairness in Burden Sharing for Climate Change Mitigation? Evidence from a Lab Experiment.”Climatic Change 124 (1–2): 65–77.Google Scholar
Gampfer, Robert, Bernauer, Thomas, and Kachi, Aya. 2014. “Obtaining Public Support for North-South Climate Funding: Evidence from Conjoint Experiments in Donor Countries.” Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 29: 118–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habyarimana, James, Humphreys, Macartan, Posner, Daniel N., and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2009. Coethnicity: Diversity and the Dilemmas of Collective Action. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hovi, Jon, Greaker, Mads, Hagem, Cathrine, and Holtsmark, Bjart. 2012. “A Credible Compliance Enforcement System for the Climate Regime.” Climate Policy 12 (6): 741–54.Google Scholar
Huff, C. and Tingley, D.. 2015. “‘Who Are These People?’ Evaluating the Demographic Characteristics and Political Preferences of MTurk Survey Respondents.” Research & Politics 2 (3): 1–12. doi:10.1177/2053168015604648.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. “Summary for Policymakers.” In Mitigation of Climate Change, eds. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M. and Miller, H. L.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1–24.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2015. “Assessing Transformation Pathways.” Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415416.012.Google Scholar
Iyer, Gokul C., Clarke, Leon E., Edmonds, James A., Hultman, Nathan E., and McJeon, Haewon C. 2015. “Long-Term Payoffs of Near-Term Low-Carbon Deployment Policies.” Energy Policy 86: 493–505.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Victor, David G.. 2011. “The Regime Complex for Climate Change.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 7–23.Google Scholar
Kindermann, Georg, Obersteiner, Michael, Sohngen, Brent, Sathaye, Jayant, Andrasko, Kenneth, Rametsteiner, Ewald, Schlamadinger, Bernhard, Wunder, Sven, and Beach, Robert. 2008. “Global Cost Estimates of Reducing Carbon Emissions through Avoided Deforestation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (30): 10302–7.Google Scholar
Landis, Florian, Florian, Landis, and Thomas, Bernauer. 2012. “Transfer Payments in Global Climate Policy.” Nature Climate Change 2 (8): 628–33.Google Scholar
McCright, Aaron M. and Dunlap, Riley E.. 2011. “The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010.” The Sociological Quarterly 52 (2): 155–94.Google Scholar
McGinty, M. 2006. “International Environmental Agreements Among Asymmetric Nations.” Oxford Economic Papers 59 (1): 45–62.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Robert, Dinar, Ariel, and Williams, Larry. 2006. “The Distributional Impact of Climate Change on Rich and Poor Countries.” Environment and Development Economics 11 (2): 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moellendorf, Darrel. 2014. The Moral Challenge of Dangerous Climate Change: Values, Poverty, and Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olmstead, Sheila M. and Robert, N. Stavins. 2012. “Three Key Elements of a Post-2012 International Climate Policy Architecture.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 6 (1): 65–85.Google Scholar
Pike, Jamison, Bogich, Tiffany, Elwood, Sarah, Finnoff, David C., and Daszak, Peter. 2014. “Economic Optimization of a Global Strategy to Address the Pandemic Threat.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (52): 18519–23.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Ekaterina, Axsen, Jonn, and Jaccard, Mark. 2014. “Does Effective Climate Policy Require Well-Informed Citizen Support?” Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 29: 92–104.Google Scholar
Rübbelke, Dirk T. G. 2011. “International Support of Climate Change Policies in Developing Countries: Strategic, Moral and Fairness Aspects.” Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics 70 (8): 1470–80.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1995. “Intergenerational Discounting.” Energy Policy 23 (4–5): 395–401.Google Scholar
Sears, David O. and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1991. “The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1–91.Google Scholar
State of California Air Resources Board. 2015. “Scoping Next Steps for Evaluating the Potential Role of Sector-Based Offset Credits Under the California Cap-And-Trade Program, Including from Jurisdictional ‘Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation’ Programs.” https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/sectorbasedoffsets/ARB%20Staff%20White%20Paper%20Sector-Based%20Offset%20Credits.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tavoni, A., Dannenberg, A., Kallis, G., and Loschel, A.. 2011. “Inequality, Communication, and the Avoidance of Disastrous Climate Change in a Public Goods Game.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (29): 11825–29.Google Scholar
Tingley, D. and Tomz, M.. 2013. “Conditional Cooperation and Climate Change.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (3): 344–68.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Weeks, Jessica, and Yarhi-Milo, Keren. 2017. “How Does Public Opinion Affect Foreign Policy in Democracies?”Google Scholar
Wei, Ting, Yang, Shili, Moore, John C., Shi, Peijun, Cui, Xuefeng, Duan, Qingyun, Xu, Bing, Dai, Yongjiu, Yuan, Wenping, Wei, Xin, Yang, Zhipeng, Wen, Tijian, Teng, Fei, Gao, Yun, Chou, Jieming, Yan, Xiaodong, Wei, Zhigang, Guo, Yan, Jiang, Yundi, Gao, Xuejie, Wang, Kaicun, Zheng, Xiaogu, Ren, Fumin, Lv, Shihua, Yu, Yongqiang, Liu, Bin, Luo, Yong, Li, Weijing, Ji, Duoying, Feng, Jinming, Wu, Qizhong, Cheng, Huaqiong, He, Jiankun, Fu, Congbin, Ye, Duzheng, Xu, Guanhua, and Dong, Wenjie. 2012. “Developed and Developing World Responsibilities for Historical Climate Change and CO2 Mitigation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (32): 12911–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werfel, Seth H. 2017. “Household Behaviour Crowds Out Support for Climate Change Policy When Sufficient Progress Is Perceived.” Nature Climate Change 7 (7): 512–15.Google Scholar
Yang, Zili, Zili, Yang, and Nordhaus, William D.. 2006. “Magnitude and Direction of Technological Transfers for Mitigating GHG Emissions.” Energy Economics 28 (5–6): 730–41.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Buntaine and Prather supplementary material

Buntaine and Prather supplementary material 1

Download Buntaine and Prather supplementary material(File)
File 671.6 KB