Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T00:00:06.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Accountability and Democratic Institutions: An Experimental Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2020

José Gabriel Castillo Open the ORCID record for José Gabriel Castillo [Opens in a new window]  and
John Hamman Open the ORCID record for John Hamman [Opens in a new window]
José Gabriel Castillo*
Affiliation:
Center for Economic Research, Laboratory of Experimental and Behavioral Economics, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, ESPOL-Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, Guayaquil, Ecuador
John Hamman
Affiliation:
Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL32306, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the extent to which centralized democratic institutions enhance collective action under political accountability. In a public goods game with costly punishment, we vary the appointment of one group member to enforce punishment. Specifically, we compare democratically elected punishers to those appointed exogenously, under both single- and multiple-selection environments. We find that democratically appointed sanctioning authority has muted effects on group outcomes; yet, they contribute as much as other group members when facing repeated elections, as opposed to the ones in single selection or exogenously appointed. One important feature of modern governance to discipline authorities is political accountability; when in place, it offers different incentives, and in particular, we observe a responsibility effect reflected in higher contribution behavior. Important in our study results, this effect rises only under a democracy.

Keywords

public goods gamesdemocracypolitical accountabilitycentralized punishment
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , Summer 2021 , pp. 128 - 144
Copyright
© The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adserà, A., Boix, C. and Payne, M.. 2003. Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19(2):445–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrus, A. and Greiner, B.. 2015. Democratic punishment in public good games with perfect and imperfect observability. Economic Research Initiatives at Duke (ERID) Working Paper (183).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J. and Gee, L.. 2012. Gun for Hire: Delegated Enforcement and Peer Punishment in Public Goods Provision. Journal of Public Economics 96(11–12):1036–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldassarri, D. and Grossman, G. (2011). Centralized Sanctioning and Legitimate Authority Promote Cooperation in Humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(27):11023–11027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolle, F. and Vogel, C.. 2011. Power Comes with Responsibility—Or Does It? Public Choice 148(3):459–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botelho, A., Harrison, G. W., Pinto, L. and Rutström, E. E.. 2005. Social norms and social choice. Technical report, Universidade do Minho. Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA).Google Scholar
Castillo, J. G. and Hamman, J.. 2020. Replication Data For: Political Accountability and Democratic Institutions: An Experimental Assessment. Harvard Dataverse, V1. doi: 10.7910/DVN/RIEMMC.Google Scholar
Castillo, J. G., Xu, Z., Zhang, P. and Zhu, X.. 2018. The effects of centralized power and institutional legitimacy on collective action. Technical report, ESPOL. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3127775.Google Scholar
Chen, D. L., Schonger, M. and Wickens, C.. 2016. Otree- an Open-Source Platform for Laboratory, Online, and Field Experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 9(Supplement C):88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinyabuguma, M., Page, T. and Putterman, L.. 2005. Cooperation Under the Threat of Expulsion in a Public Goods Experiment. Journal of Public Economics 89(8):1421–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D. J., Hamman, J. R. and Weber, R. A.. 2020. Fool Me Once: An Experiment on Credibility and Leadership. The Economic Journal. doi: 10.1093/ej/ueaa059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeAngelo, G. J., Dubois, D. and Romaniuc, R.. 2018. The Perils of Democracy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, in press. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.06.020.Google Scholar
Ertan, A., Page, T. and Putterman, L.. 2009. Who to Punish? Individual Decisions and Majority Rule in Mitigating the Free Rider Problem. European Economic Review 53(5):495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. and Gächter, S.. 2000. Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments. American Economic Review 90(4):980–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, J. (1986). Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control. Public Choice 50(1):5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, J. (1999). Accountability and Authority: Toward A Theory of Political Accountability. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation 131:133.Google Scholar
Fleiß, J. and Palan, S.. 2013. Of Coordinators and Dictators: A Public Goods Experiment. Games 4(4):584–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, B. 2015. Subject Pool Recruitment Procedures: Organizing Experiments With ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association 1(1):114–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G.. 2014. Do Selection Rules Affect Leader Responsiveness? Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9(1):1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. and Baldassarri, D.. 2012. The Impact of Elections on Cooperation: Evidence From a Lab-in-the-Field Experiment in Uganda. American Journal of Political Science 56(4):964–985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamman, J. R., Weber, R. A. and Woon, J.. 2011. An Experimental Investigation of Electoral Delegation and the Provision of Public Goods. American Journal of Political Science 55(4):738–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves Heap, S. P., Tsutsui, K. and Zizzo, D. J.. 2015. An experiment on democratic versus dictatorial collective decision making. Technical report, UEA, U Bath, U Queensland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, G.A. and Gordon, S. C.. 2004. Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When it Runs for Office? American Journal of Political Science, 48(2):247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, S., Cherry, T. L. and Shogren, J. F.. 2007. Voting, Punishment, and Public Goods. Economic Inquiry 45(3):557–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, J. O. 1995. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research. In Handbook of Experimental Economics, Handbook of Experimental Economics, eds. Kagel, J. and Roth, A. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nikiforakis, N. and Normann, H.-T.. 2008. A Comparative Statics Analysis of Punishment in Public-Good Experiments. Experimental Economics 11(4):358–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putterman, L., Tyran, J.-R. and Kamei, K.. 2011. Public Goods and Voting on Formal Sanction Schemes. Journal of Public Economics 95(9):1213–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sefton, M., Shupp, R. and Walker, J.. 2007. The Effect of Rewards and Sanctions in Provision of Public Goods. Economic Inquiry 45(4):671–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter, M., Haigner, S. and Kocher, M. G.. 2010. Choosing the Carrot or the Stick? Endogenous Institutional Choice in Social Dilemma Situations. Review of Economic Studies 77(4):1540–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyran, J.-R. and Feld, L. P.. 2006. Achieving Compliance When Legal Sanctions are Non-Deterrent*. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 108(1):135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lange, P. A., Rockenbach, B. and Yamagishi, T.. 2014. Reward and Punishment in Social Dilemmas. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J. M., Gardner, R., Herr, A. and Ostrom, E.. 2000. Collective Choice in the Commons: Experimental Results on Proposed Allocation Rules and Votes. The Economic Journal 110(460):212–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zudenkova, G. 2018. Electoral Accountability and Interdistrict Competition. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 10(3):143–176.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Castillo and Hamman Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/RIEMMC
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Castillo and Hamman supplementary material

Castillo and Hamman supplementary material 1

Download Castillo and Hamman supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 118.5 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Castillo and Hamman supplementary material

Castillo and Hamman supplementary material 2

Download Castillo and Hamman supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 733 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Castillo and Hamman supplementary material

Castillo and Hamman supplementary material 3

Download Castillo and Hamman supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 733 KB
Supplementary material: File

Castillo and Hamman supplementary material

Castillo and Hamman supplementary material 4

Download Castillo and Hamman supplementary material(File)
File 8.6 KB