Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:06:01.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Differences in Political Knowledge: Bringing Situation Back In

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2017

Toni Alexander Ihme  and
Markus Tausendpfund
Toni Alexander Ihme
Affiliation:
Department of Evaluation, University of Hagen, Universitätsstr. 47, Hagen 58097, Germany, e-mail: [email protected]
Markus Tausendpfund
Affiliation:
Faculty of Cultural and Social Sciences, University of Hagen, Universitätsstr. 33, Hagen 58097, Germany, e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the best-known empirical findings in the political sciences is the gender difference in political knowledge: women show less political knowledge than men. Conventional research argues that this difference is mainly a product of socialization, structural factors, and biology. Our paper brings a new perspective to the explanation of the gender gap in political knowledge. Based on an online survey and an experiment1, we emphasize the relevance of gender stereotypes as a situational pressure that reduces the performance of women in a political knowledge test. Two conclusions emerge from the analysis: First, our results indicate the existence of a negative stereotype related to the political knowledge of women. Second, the activation of gender stereotypes affects performance on a political knowledge test. Consistent with previous research on stereotype threat, our results indicate that the performance of men on a political knowledge test is affected by gender stereotypes.

Keywords

Political knowledgegender gapstereotype threat
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring 2018 , pp. 39 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abendschön, S. and Tausendpfund, M.. 2017. “Political Knowledge of Children and the Role of Sociostructural Factors.” American Behavioral Scientist, 61 (2), 204–21. doi:10.1177/0002764216689122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., and Maes, H. H.. 2012. “The Genetic Basis of Political Sophistication.” Twin Research and Human Genetics, 15 (1), 34–41. doi:10.1375/twin.15.1.34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosson, J. K., Haymovitz, E. L., and Pinel, E. C.. 2004. “When Saying and Doing Diverge: The Effects of Stereotype Threat on Self-Reported Versus Non-Verbal Anxiety.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 (2), 247–55. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00099-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodish, A. B. and Devine, P. G.. 2009. The Role of Performance Avoidance Goals and Worry in Mediating the Relationship Between Stereotype Threat and Performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (1), 180–85. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., and Verba, S.. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, R. J. 2000. Citizen Attitudes and Political Behavior. Comparative Political Studies, 33 (6-7), 912–40. doi:10.1177/001041400003300609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, M. X., and Keeter, S.. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, M. X., and Keeter, S.. 2005. Gender and Political Knowledge. In Tolleson-Rinehart, S. and Josephson, J. J. (Eds.), Gender and American Politics. Women, Men, and the Political Process (2nd ed., pp. 21–47). Armonk: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Dolan, K. 2011. Do Women and Men Know Different Things? Measuring Gender Differences in Political Knowledge. The Journal of Politics, 73 (1), 97–107. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, J. K. 2009. Gender Differences in Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Characteristics-Based and Returns-Based Differences. Political Behavior, 31 (1), 117–36. doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9059-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin-Rittberger, J. 2016. Cross-National Gender Gaps in Political Knowledge: How Much Is Due to Context? Political Research Quarterly, 69 (3), 391–402. doi:10.1177/1065912916642867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraile, M. 2013. Do Information-Rich Contexts Reduce Knowledge Inequalities? The Contextual Determinants of Political Knowledge in Europe. Acta Politica, 48 (2), 119–43. doi:10.1057/ap.2012.34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraile, M. 2014a. Do Women Know Less About Politics Than Men? The Gender Gap in Political Knowledge in Europe. Social Politics, 21 (2), 261–89. doi:10.1093/sp/jxu006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraile, M. 2014b. Does Deliberation Contribute to Decreasing the Gender Gap in Knowledge? European Union Politics, 15 (3), 372–88. doi:10.1177/1465116514527525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grönlund, K. and Milner, H.. 2006. The Determinants of Political Knowledge in Comparative Perspective. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29 (4), 386–406. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00157.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannagan, R. J., Littvay, L., and Popa, S. A.. 2014. Theorizing Sex Differences in Political Knowledge: Insights from a Twin Study. Politics & Gender, 10 (1), 89–114. doi:10.1017/S1743923X1300055X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Medland, S. E., and Eaves, L. J.. 2009. Do Genes Contribute to the, Gender Gap'? The Journal of Politics, 71 (1), 262–76. doi:10.1017/S0022381608090178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausmann, M. 2014. Arts Versus Science – Academic Background Implicitly Activates Gender Stereotypes on Cognitive Abilities with Threat Raising Men's (but Lowering Women's) Performance. Intelligence, 46, 235–45. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huguet, P. and Régner, I.. 2007. Stereotype Threat Among Schoolgirls in Quasi-Ordinary Classroom Circumstances. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 (3), 545–60. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihme, T. A. and Mauch, M.. 2007. Werbung Als Implizite Aktivierungsquelle Von Geschlechterstereotypen und ihr Einfluss auf Mathematikleistungen Sowie auf das Computerwissen bei Mädchen und Jungen. Empirische Pädagogik, 21 (3), 291–305.Google Scholar
Laurin, R. 2013. Stereotype Threat and Lift Effects in Motor Task Performance: The Mediating Role of Somatic and Cognitive Anxiety. Journal of Social Psychology, 153 (6), 687–99. doi:10.1080/00224545.2013.821098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lizotte, M.-K. and Sidman, A. H.. 2009. Explaining the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge. Politics & Gender, 5 (2), 127–51. doi:10.1017/S1743923X09000130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luskin, R. C. and Bullock, J. G.. 2011. Don't Know Means Don't Know: DK Responses and the Public's Level of Political Knowledge. The Journal of Politics, 73 (2), 547–57. doi:10.1017/S0022381611000132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlone, M. S., Aronson, J., and Kobrynowicz, D.. 2006. Stereotype Threat and the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30 (4), 392–8. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00314.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, J. J. and Anderson, M. R.. 2004. The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge. The Journal of Politics, 66 (2), 492–512. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00161.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, H.-H. D. and Ryan, A. M.. 2008. Does Stereotype Threat Affect Test Performance of Minorities and Women? A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93 (6), 1314–34. doi:10.1037/a0012702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ondercin, H. L., Garand, J. C., and Crapanzano, L. E.. 2011. Political Learning During the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election: The Impact of the Campaign on the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge. Electoral Studies, 30 (4), 727–37. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orum, A. M., Cohen, R. S., Grassmuch, S., and Orum, A.. 1974. Sex, Socialization and Politics. American Sociological Review, 39 (2), 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, L. and Bacherle, P.. 2011. Politisches Interesse Kurzskala (PIKS) – Entwicklung und Validierung. Politische Psychologie, 1 (1), 19–35.Google Scholar
Pereira, M. F., Fraile, M., and Rubal, M.. 2015. Young and Gapped? Political Knowledge of Girls and Boys in Europe. Political Research Quarterly, 68 (1), 63–76. doi:10.1177/1065912914554040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruysers, S. and Blais, J.. 2014. Anything Women Can Do Men Can Do Better: An Experiment Examining the Effects of Stereotype Threat on Political Knowledge and Efficacy. The Social Science Journal, 51 (3), 341–9. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2014.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reips, U.-D. 2002. Standards for Internet-Based Experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49 (4), 243–56. doi:10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.243.Google ScholarPubMed
Rydell, R. J., Rydell, M. T., and Boucher, K. L.. 2010. The Effect of Negative Performance Stereotypes on Learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99 (6), 883–96. doi:10.1037/a0021139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanbonmatsu, K. 2003. Gender-Related Political Knowledge and the Descriptive Representation of Women. Political Behavior, 25 (4), 367–88. doi:10.1023/B:POBE.0000004063.83917.2d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmader, T. and Johns, M.. 2003. Converging Evidence That Stereotype Threat Reduces Working Memory Capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (3), 440–52. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmader, T., Johns, M., and Forbes, C.. 2008. An Integrated Process Model of Stereotype Threat Effects on Performance. Psychological Review, 115 (2), 336–56. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, M. C. and Bos, A. L.. 2014. Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians. Political Psychology, 35 (2), 245–66. doi:10.1111/pops.12040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibt, B. and Förster, J.. 2004. Stereotype Threat and Performance: How Self-Stereotypes Influence Processing by Inducing Regulatory Foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87 (1), 38–56. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, A. 2017. How Can We Explain the Gender Gap in Children's Political Knowledge? American Behavioral Scientist, 61 (2), 222–37. doi:10.1177/0002764216689123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, C. M. 1997. A Threat in the Air. How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance. American Psychologist, 52 (6), 613–29. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, C. M. and Aronson, J.. 1995. Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (5), 797–811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoessel, K., Ihme, T. A., Barbarino, M.-L., Fisseler, B., and Stürmer, S.. 2015. Sociodemographic Diversity and Distance Education: Who Drops Out from Academic Programs and Why? Research in Higher Education, 59 (3), 228–46. doi:10.1007/s11162-014-9343-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Deth, J. W., Abendschön, S., and Vollmar, M.. 2011. Children and Politics: An Empirical Reassessment of Early Political Socialization. Political Psychology, 32 (1), 147–74. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00798.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, G. M. and Cohen, G. L.. 2003. Stereotype Lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39 (5), 456–67. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00019-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westle, B., Begemann, C., and Rütter, A.. 2014. Effects of Measurement-Variants on the Record of Political Knowledge. Paper Presented for the European Consortium for Political Research, Salamanca, April 10–15.Google Scholar
Woodcock, A., Hernandez, P. R., Estrada, M., and Schultz, P. W.. 2012. The Consequences of Chronic Stereotype Threat: Domain Disidentification and Abandonment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103 (4), 635–46. doi:10.1037/a0029120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 1

Replication files

Download Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 1(File)
File 173.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 2

Replication files

Download Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 2(File)
File 152.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 3

Replication files

Download Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 3(File)
File 1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 4

Replication files

Download Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 4(File)
File 53 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 5

Replication files

Download Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 5(File)
File 97.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 6

Replication files

Download Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 6(File)
File 111.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 7

Replication files

Download Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 7(File)
File 7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 8

Replication files

Download Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 8(File)
File 20.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 9

Replication files

Download Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 9(File)
File 20.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 10

Replication files

Download Ihme and Tausendpfund supplementary material 10(File)
File 20.7 KB