Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:48:14.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethnoreligious Identity, Immigration, and Redistribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2017

Stuart Soroka ,
Matthew Wright ,
Richard Johnston ,
Jack Citrin ,
Keith Banting  and
Will Kymlicka
Stuart Soroka
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Studies, University of Michigan, 5370 North Quad, 105 South State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1285, USA, e-mail: [email protected], @s_soroka
Matthew Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Government, American University, Washington, DC, USA, email: [email protected]
Richard Johnston
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, e-mail: [email protected]
Jack Citrin
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, email: [email protected]
Keith Banting
Affiliation:
School of Policy Studies and Department of Political Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, email: [email protected]
Will Kymlicka
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do increasing, and increasingly diverse, immigration flows lead to declining support for redistributive policy? This concern is pervasive in the literatures on immigration, multiculturalism and redistribution, and in public debate as well. The literature is nevertheless unable to disentangle the degree to which welfare chauvinism is related to (a) immigrant status or (b) ethnic difference. This paper reports on results from a web-based experiment designed to shed light on this issue. Representative samples from the United States, Quebec, and the “Rest-of-Canada” responded to a vignette in which a hypothetical social assistance recipient was presented as some combination of immigrant or not, and Caucasian or not. Results from the randomized manipulation suggest that while ethnic difference matters to welfare attitudes, in these countries it is immigrant status that matters most. These findings are discussed in light of the politics of diversity and recognition, and the capacity of national policies to address inequalities.

Keywords

Survey experimentimmigrationsocial welfare policypolitical psychologyCanadaUnited States
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , Winter 2017 , pp. 173 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banting, K. and Soroka, S.. 2012. “Minority Nationalism and Immigrant Integration in Canada.” Nations and Nationalism 18 (2): 156–176.Google Scholar
Fox, C. 2004. “The Changing Color of Welfare? How Whites’ Attitudes toward Latinos Influence Support for Welfare.” American Journal of Sociology 110: 580–625.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. 1996. “‘Race-Coding’ and Opposition to Welfare.” American Political Science Review 90: 593–604.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. 2009. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J. and Hopkins, D. J.. 2014. “The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harell, A., Soroka, S., and Iyengar, S.. 2016. “Race, Prejudice and Attitudes toward Redistribution: A Comparative Experimental Approach.” European Journal of Political Research 55: 723–744.Google Scholar
Kinder, D., and Kam, C. (2009). Us Against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nannestad, P. 2007. “Immigration and Welfare States: A Survey of 15 Years of Research.” European Journal of Political Economy 23 (2): 512–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, M., Hurwitz, J., and Sniderman, P.. 1997. “Racial Stereotypes and Whites’ Political Views of Blacks in the Context of Welfare and Crime.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 30–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeskens, T. and van Oorschot, W.. 2012. “Disentangling the ‘New Liberal Dilemma’: On the Relation between General Welfare Redistribution Preferences and Welfare Chauvinism.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 53: 120–139.Google Scholar
Rydgen, J. 2008. “Immigration Sceptics, Xenophobes, or Racists? Radical Right Voting in Six European Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 47: 737–765.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, M. 2014. Ethnic Diversity and Social Cohesion: Immigration, Ethnic Fractionalization and Potentials for Civic Action. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Schram, S. F., Soss, J. B., and Fording, R. C., eds. 2010. Race and the Politics of Welfare Reform. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Senik, C., Stichnoth, H., and Van der Straeten, K.. 2009. Immigration and Natives’ Attitudes towards the Welfare State: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Social Indicators Research 91 (3): 345–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stichnoth, H., and Van der Straeten, K.. 2013. “Ethnic Diversity, Public Spending, and Individual Support for the Welfare State: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (2): 364–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, N., Soroka, S., Iyengar, S., Aalberg, T., Duch, R., Fraile, M., Hahn, K. S., Hansen, K. M., Harell, A., Helbling, M., Jackman, S. D., and Kobayashi, T.. 2017. “Economic and Cultural Drivers of Immigrant Support Worldwide.” British Journal of Political Science (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
Van der Meer, T. and Tolsma, J.. 2014. “Ethnic Diversity and Its Supposed Detrimental Effects on Social Cohesion.” Annual Review of Sociology 40: 459–478.Google Scholar
van der Waal, J., Achterberg, P., Houtman, D., de Koster, W., and Manevska, K.. 2010. “‘Some are More Equal than Others’: Economic Egalitarianism and Welfare Chauvinism in the Netherlands.” Journal of European Social Policy 20: 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, M., Levy, M., and Citrin, J.. 2016. “Public Attitudes toward Immigration Policy across the Legal/Illegal Divide: The Role of Categorical and Attribute-Based Decision-Making.” Political Behavior 38 (1): 229–253.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Soroka et al supplementary material

Soroka et al supplementary material 1

Download Soroka et al supplementary material(File)
File 25.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Soroka et al supplementary material

Soroka et al supplementary material 2

Download Soroka et al supplementary material(File)
File 4.4 KB