Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:37:09.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building Confidence in Elections: The Case of Electoral Monitors in Kosova

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2014

Dawn Brancati
Dawn Brancati*
Affiliation:
Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While most research on electoral monitors has focused on the effect of electoral monitors on politicians and their behavior in terms of committing electoral fraud, this study examines the effect of electoral monitors on citizens, and their effect, in particular, on people's perceptions of electoral integrity and behavior in terms of turnout at the polls. To examine this relationship, I conducted a field experiment around the 2009/2010 municipal elections in Kosova, which varied the amount of information people had about the responsibilities of monitors in these elections. In the experiment, people who had more information about the monitors' responsibilities believed that the elections were more free and fair than those who had less information, and also believed that the monitors helped make these elections more free and fair, even though they were not more likely to vote as a result.

Keywords

Field experimentvoter turnoutelectoral monitors
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , Spring 2014 , pp. 6 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beaulieu, E. 2014. Electoral Protest and Democracy in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, E. and Hyde, S. D. 2009. In the Shadow of Democracy Promotion: Strategic Manipulation, International Observers, and Election Boycotts. Comparative Political Studies 42 (3): 392–415.Google Scholar
Birch, S. 2010. Perceptions of Electoral Fairness and Voter Turnout. Comparative Political Studies 43 (12): 1601–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, J. I. and McCann, J. A. 1998. Mexicans React to Electoral Fraud and Political Corruption: An Assessment of Public Opinion and Voting Behavior. Electoral Studies 17 (4): 483–503.Google Scholar
Donno, D. 2007. Monitoring Matters: IGO Election Observation and Democracy Protection.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, C. H. 2004. Georgia's Rose Revolution. Journal of Democracy 15 (2): 110–24.Google Scholar
Hall, T. E., Alvarez, R. M. and Atkeson, L. R., eds. 2012. Cofirming Elections: Creating Confidence and Integrity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Holbrook, A. L. and Krosnick, J. A. 2010. Social Desirability Bias in Voter Turnout Reports: Tests Using the Item Count Technique. Public Opinion Quarterly 74 (1): 37–67.Google Scholar
Hyde, S. D. 2007. The Observer Effect in International Politics: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. World Politics, 60 (Summer): 37–63.Google Scholar
Hyde, S. and Marinov, N. 2014. Information and Self-Enforcing Democracy: The Role of International Electoral Observation. International Organization 68 (2): 329–59.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. (2010). International Influences on Election Quality and Turnover. Presented at the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2–5, 2010, in Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Kerevel, Y. 2009. Election Management Bodies and Public Confidence in Elections: Lessons from Latin America. Washington, DC: International Foundation of Electoral Systems.Google Scholar
Klesner, J. L. and Lawson, C. 2001. Adiós to the PRI? Changing Voter Turnout in Mexico's Political Transition. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 17 (1): 17–39.Google Scholar
Lott, J. R. Jr., 2006. Evidence of Voter Fraud and the Impact that Regulations to Reduce Fraud Have on Voter Participation Rates. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
McFaul, M. 2007. Ukraine Imports Democracy: External Influences of the Orange Revolution. International Security 32 (2): 45–83.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (2010). Democratic Deficits. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, J. A. (2007). Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and Post-Communist Colored Revolutions. Perspectives on Politics 5 (3): 535–51.Google Scholar