Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:12:33.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Identity and Voting in Afghanistan: Evidence from a Survey Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2015

Torsten Jochem ,
Ilia Murtazashvili  and
Jennifer Murtazashvili
Torsten Jochem
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Amsterdam, Plantage Muidergracht 12, 1018 TV Amsterdam, Netherlands, e-mail: [email protected]
Ilia Murtazashvili
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh, 3424 Posvar Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA, e-mail: [email protected]
Jennifer Murtazashvili
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh, 3806 Posvar Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA, e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The basis of social identity in Afghanistan is the concept of qawm. As qawm refers to an individual’s solidarity group, such as village, tribe, subtribe, or even ethnic group, it captures broad in-group/out-group distinctions. We analyze a survey experiment to explore how qawm affiliation affects individual perceptions of politicians running for a fictitious local election. Contrary to expectations derived from the literatures on Afghanistan and on identity politics, we find qawm affiliation does not influence voter choice or perceived importance that a fellow qawm member should be elected. Moreover, qawm affiliation actually undermines individual perceptions a candidate will work on behalf of voters if elected. We explore two general mechanisms that may explain these findings, including weakening social ties and salience of the qawm.

Keywords

Social identityAfghanistantribeconflictsurvey experiment
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , Spring 2015 , pp. 47 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Barfield, T. 2010. Afghanistan: A Cultural and Political History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Besley, T. 2005. “Political Selection.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (3): 43–60.Google Scholar
Besley, T., Pande, R., Rahman, L., and Rao, V. 2004. “The Politics of Public Good Provision: Evidence from Indian Local Governments.” Journal of the European Economic Association 2 (2–3): 416–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, K. 2005. “Ethnic Parties and Democratic Stability.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (2): 235–52.Google Scholar
Chandra, K. 2007. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christia, F. 2012. Alliance Formation in Civil Wars. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coburn, N. 2011. Bazaar Politics: Power and Pottery in an Afghan Market Town. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Coburn, N., and Larson, A. 2014. Derailing Democray in Afghanistan: Elections in an Unstable Political Landscape. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Duflo, E. 2005. “Why Political Reservations?” Journal of the European Economic Association 3 (2–3): 668–78.Google Scholar
Dunning, T., and Harrison, L. 2010. “Cross-Cutting Cleavages and Ethnic Voting: An Experimental Study of Cousinage in Mali.” American Political Science Review 104 (1): 21–39.Google Scholar
Dunning, T., and Nilekani, J. 2013. “Ethnic Quotas and Political Mobilization: Caste, Parties, and Distribution in Indian Village Councils.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 35–56.Google Scholar
Fearon, J. D., and Laitin, D. D. 2000. “Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Identity.” International Organization 54 (4): 845–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferree, K. E. 2006. “Explaining South Africa’s Racial Census.” Journal of Politics 68 (4): 803–15.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Humphreys, M., de la Sierra, R. S., and van der Windt, P. 2013. “Fishing, Commitment, and Communication: A Proposal for Comprehensive Nonbinding Research Registration.” Political Analysis 21 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Ichino, N., and Nathan, N. L. 2013. “Crossing the Line: Local Ethnic Geography and Voting in Ghana.” American Political Science Review 107 (2): 344–61.Google Scholar
Kasara, K. 2013. “Separate and Suspicious: Local Social and Political Context and Ethnic Tolerance in Kenya.” The Journal of Politics 75 (4): 921–36.Google Scholar
Lyall, J., Blair, G., and Imai, K. 2013. “Explaining Support for Combatants during Wartime: A Survey Experiment in Afghanistan.” American Political Science Review 107 (4): 679–705.Google Scholar
Posner, D. N. 2004. “The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 529–45.Google Scholar
Posner, D. N. 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, O. 1990. Islam and Resistance in Afghanistan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, B. R. 2002. The Fragmentation of Afghanistan: State Formation and Collapse in the International System. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. I. 2006. Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Jochem supplementary material

Tables A1 and A2

Download Jochem supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 352.2 KB