Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T19:22:54.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analogic Perspective-Taking and Attitudes Toward Political Organizations: An Experiment with a Teachers’ Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2021

Alexander Hertel-Fernandez  and
Ethan Porter Open the ORCID record for Ethan Porter [Opens in a new window]
Alexander Hertel-Fernandez
Affiliation:
School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Ethan Porter*
Affiliation:
School of Media & Public Affairs; Department of Political Science; Institute for Data, Democracy and Politics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Attitudes toward social out-groups can be improved through “analogic perspective-taking,” whereby respondents are encouraged to use an analogy to take the perspective of the group. It is unclear, however, whether analogic perspective-taking can improve attitudes toward political organizations; how perspective-taking fares compared to the provision of narrative alone; and the limits of the attitude changes it creates. We report results from an experiment that tested analogic perspective-taking exercises about members of teachers’ unions. While perspective-taking improves attitudes toward unions, union members, and willingness to pay more in education taxes, it also increases support for some antiunion policies. A second study suggests that the bidirectional policy effects are attributable to subjects’ difficulty distinguishing pro- from antiunion policies. Analogic perspective-taking can improve attitudes toward social and political groups. But narrative exchange is not always superior to narrative provision, and both approaches may yield mixed effects on policy attitudes.

Keywords

analogic perspective-takingSurvey experimenteducationteachers unions
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , Spring 2023 , pp. 100 - 111
Open Practices
Open data Open materials
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article has earned badges for transparent research practices: Open Data and Open Materials. For details see the Data Availability Statement.

†

The authors thank Avi Feller for discussion, and Brianne Sears, Mike Wiser and the Iowa State Education Association for fielding the experiment. All mistakes are our own.

References

Adida, Claire L., Lo, Adeline and Platas, Melina. 2018. “Perspective taking can promote short-term inclusionary behavior toward Syrian refugees.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115: 9521–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broockman, David and Kalla, Joshua. 2016. “Durably reducing transphobia: A _eld experiment on door-to-door canvassing.” Science 352(6282): 220–4. URL: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6282/220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buell, Ryan W., Porter, Ethan and Norton, Michael I.. 2020. “Surfacing the Submerged State: Operational Transparency Increases Trust in and Engagement with Government.” Harvard Business School Marketing Unit Working Paper Series. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2349801 Google Scholar
Coppock, Alexander and McClellan, Oliver. 2019. “Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents.” Research and Politics. URL: https://secure-web.cisco.com/1xHMb-mgqJhxZiZBZs7BbjtpsAGZkh1-arBzdlh19SXe81tCrc7g0-zeijc_oYiE5AJKnxWn0wXUgVxh3GioXVWtgGfziYQTrRx5L3VrA9aqLqXtiqc_vfK6IjM_L7nwxd4saRDBH_6tLy12xzCcNdWSW7EEZSMtKm6c3r7lQaBNdsz2E_dXe4Pl0iIWIOz37K2VNa6dXIvEv70ykU9cpj49HZELW1DcY5K4PLVCd9frGGXGPyHDbffsH4XARGz1H3_QmOvvSzfCxQTFJ5QhgTSIo4SgkjJW9f3e-tA2CLQOD_LkI1VDcfLtcDzct9XKtTcI5tYw2njHbMKCF59XDI57RyO7D-3zhTPjaQKj1tNZPqzfMrbhvTjMVJ1PfacRXhZYgIL_PhWkQx9Uze3LXOg/https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.sagepub.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1177%2F2053168018822174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Katherine J. 2014. Political Understanding of Economic Crises. In Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession, eds. Bartels, L. and Bermeo, N. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N. and Leeper, Thomas J.. 2012. “Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its E_ects.” American Journal of Political Science 56(4): 875–96. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00582.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, Adam D. and Ku, Gillian. 2004. “The Effects of Perspective-Taking on Prejudice: The Moderating Role of Self-Evaluation.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30(5): 594–604. PMID: 15107159. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262802 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galinsky, Adam D. and Moskowitz, Gordon B.. 2000. “Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 708–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, Melanie C., Brock, C. Timothy and Kaufman, Geoff F.. 2006. “Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds.” Communication Theory 14(4): 311–27. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander and Porter, Ethan. 2021. “Replication Data for Analogic Perspective-Taking and Attitudes Toward Political Organizations: An Experiment With A Teachers’ Union.” Harvard Dataverse. URL: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/8IEROH CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalla, Joshua and Broockman, David. 2021. “Which narrative strategies durably reduce prejudice? Evidence from _eld and survey experiments supporting the e_cacy of perspective-getting.” URL: https://osf.io/z2awt/ Google Scholar
Kalla, Joshua L. and Broockman, David E.. 2020. “Reducing Exclusionary Attitudes through Interpersonal Conversation: Evidence from Three Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review 114(2): 410–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, John V. and Newman, Benjamin J.. 2019. “Organized Labor as the New Undeserving Rich?: Mass Media, Class-Based Anti-Union Rhetoric and Public Support for Unions in the United States.” British Journal of Political Science 49(3): 997–1026.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paluck, Elizabeth Levy and Green, Donald P.. 2009. “Prejudice Reduction: WhatWorks? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice.” Annual Review of Psychology 60(1): 339–67. PMID: 18851685. URL: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Ethan and Wood, Thomas J.. 2019. False Alarm: The Truth About Political Mistruths in the Trump Era. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Diane E. 1993. “Public opinion and media coverage of labor unions.” Journal of Labor Research 14: 151–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Claude. 2010. Whistling Vivaldi: How Stereotypes Affect Us and What We Can Do. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Hertel-Fernandez and Porter Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/8IEROH
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Hertel-Fernandez and Porter supplementary material

Hertel-Fernandez and Porter supplementary material

Download Hertel-Fernandez and Porter supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 425.4 KB